|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chapter 4: Reviews Pauly, 1968 In this overview the author compared the data of his own literature publications of his first hundred published cases of MFTs (Pauly, 1963, 1965) with the data of Benjamin's monograph (Benjamin, 1966), resp., the short version of the results reported about there (Benjamin, 1967).
*The publications about FM-transsexualism were in preparation; the publication does not contain further statements about this sample; the corresponding data was published six years later (see Pauly, 1974a, b) **Pauly (1963) was a predecessor of Pauly (1965) presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, 1963, St. Louis. The author could not exclude that his sample overlapped with that of Benjamin's. ***The mean age was at the time of first surgery 32.2 years (range 19-58; the mean value corresponds to the one mentioned in Pauly [1965]; the range diverges noticeably). The follow-up times measures since the first surgery range from three months to 13 years, with a mean of five years (comp. the statement in Pauly [1965]: according to which the follow-up time for the sample included here range from six months to 25 years). Evaluation Fields and Criteria
In Pauly's series the portion of uncertain results is relatively high, with 46%, disregarding the circumstance primary authors generally spoke of favorable results. Where this could not be fathomed, the author decided on the category uncertain. The categories "good" and "satisfactory" used by Benjamin were compiled by Pauly to facilitate the comparability. Follow-up Studies Mentioned Author's Conclusions Indication Recommendations (2) The physical appearance and behavior should demonstrate that the subject gets along in the other gender role and is accepted in it. (3) Sufficient intelligence to comprehend the limits and possible complications of surgery. (4) The readiness to participate in the pre-surgical diagnosis and the long-term follow-up study. (5) An agreement not to sue the physician and the clinic or obtain material gain from the procedure by organizing a big media circus. Remarks Besides this, the publication contains remarks about the establishment of the Gender Identity Clinics of the Johns Hopkins University Clinic in Baltimore, MD, at the University School of California at Los Angeles and at the University of Minnesota Medical School in Minneapolis. It also reports about a change of mind within the US-American medical groups regarding sex reassignment surgery. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||