IJT logo

 

Introduction

Editors:
Friedemann Pfäfflin,
Ulm University, Germany
 

Walter O. Bockting,
University of Minnesota, USA
 

Eli Coleman,
University of Minnesota, USA
 

Richard Ekins,
University of Ulster at Coleraine, UK
 

Dave King,
University of Liverpool, UK

Managing Editor:
Noelle N Gray,
University of Minnesota, USA

Editorial Assistant:
Erin Pellett,
University of Minnesota, USA

Editorial Board

Authors

Contents
book Historic Papers

Info
Authors´Guidelines

© Copyright

Published by
Symposion Publishing

  
ISSN 1434-4599



Volume 1, Number 1, July - September 1997




Legal Aspects of Transsexualism in Brazilian Law - A Privat Law Approach

By C. Lima Marques, J.C.D., and E. Ramos da Silva

Citation: Lima Marques C, Ramos da Silva E (1997) Legal Aspects of Transsexualism in Brazilian Law - A Privat Law Approach. IJT 1,1, http://www.symposion.com/ijt/ijtc0105.htm

Introduction
Brazilian legislation and case law (de lege lata)
New tendencies in the question of transsexualism
Conclusion
References

Introduction

Is there a right to choose one’s own sex according to the Brazilian law? Is the Brazilian law system tolerant of medical interventions in sex reassignment? After these medical interventions is it then possible for the transsexuals to change their name and sex in the birth register? And can these people marry, or adopt a child?

These questions have not yet been given a clear answer in the legal writings and legislation in Brazil. Some evolutions over the past twenty years can be noted and will be examined in this paper, however they did not lead to a special legal regime about transsexualism. The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 assures equal treatment for all people, independently of sex, race, religion and age, and condemns all forms of discrimination (Art. 3, IV Constituição Federal). The Brazilian Constitutional Law guarantees a right to privacy and to a self image. Whether this constitutional approach could be used to assure legal rights to transsexuals after sex reassignment is not certain. The majority of authors agree with this influence of constitutional law in private law as source of new subjective rights. However this line of reasoning in transsexual matters has never been adopted by the Superior Courts.

This article examines these important issues with a private law approach. The two major areas to be examined are: firstly, the Brazilian legislation on this matter and, secondly, the practical effects and the case law. So in the first part we would like to present the actual legislation and case law de lege lata, by explaining its background and considering the extent of its application in Brazilian practice; in the second part we will expose some tendencies of change de lege ferenda.

Brazilian legislation and case law (de lege lata)

In Brazil there is no special legislation for transsexual persons, although there has been a recent effort to pass a Bill (Projeto de Lei) on this matter. Until now this problem has been governed by general laws, in particular the Civil Registration Act of 1973.

Name change

The name change is an important legal consequence of medical interventions toward sex reassignment. In Brazil, the principle of unchangeability of the forename (Art. 58 Civil Registration Act) prevails. It is possible to change the forename only in four cases:

1) in the case of adoption of child;

2) in the naturalization process, when the person wants to change or translate his name;

3) in the case of an orthographic error; and

4) if the name exposes the person to ridicule.

This last possibility is freuquently used in cases of transsexual persons, because after the medical intervention their previous name (male or female) does not conform with the new physical situation and could expose these persons to ridicule. The State Attorneys (Ministério Público) used to reject this interpretation stating that the previous male or female names per se were not "ridiculous" or "negative" and also that the medical intervention in itself was not sufficient to determine a "legal sex and name change".

The actual Brazilian legal rule at first view seems to be applicable in these cases. A male or a female forename of a person with external appearance and characteristics of the opposite sex exposes this person to ridicule in society and Art. 58 and Art. 55 of the Civil Registration Act of 1973 authorize the name change. As a matter of fact the name change is only an accessory problem, but it still requires the same solution.

Two tendencies in recent case law can be noted: on the one hand the person who wants to change his/her data on the birth register, usually proposes both changes (name and sex), which makes the application of the current legislation difficult; on the other hand, the tendency of some single judges is to accept the name change, while the superior courts don't.

Sex determination

There is no special legislation about sex determination in Brazil. The Civil Registration Act of 1973 requires information on the sex of the child in the birth register. This information is given directly by the parents, without any necessary medical confirmation. Problems appear in cases of "intersexuality", which according to the Brazilian doctrine are errors in the determination of the sex and can be corrected later with a judicial decree. In these cases the birth register is changed, because the persons sexual "status" has changed. The only legal basis of such a decision however is an analogy (analogia) with the civil status change of the adopted child after the adoption decree. Through this analogia, this lack of special legislation has been overcome in practice in cases of intersexuals.

On the other hand, in case of transsexualism this lack of legislation is mostly used as a limit to the change of the birth register. In fact there is a conviction in Brazilian case law and doctrine about the important difference between transsexual and intersexual cases. In the cases of intersexuality (physical defects) the question of a legal error in the birth register arises, because there really has been a sex reassignment. The solution would be a special legislation on transsexualism, with a clear authorization of gender change. One interesting decision holds that the birth register should be changed after the medical intervention, not as male or as female, but a quasi third gender, namely "transsexual", in order to avoid misunderstandings within society.

Marriage

In Brazil, the civil rights of lesbians and gays have not up until now become a prominent issue on the public agenda. At the present time, there is no scientific debate on the possibility of a legal status or registration of same-sex relationships. Nevertheless there is a long history in Brazil of legal recognition of cohabitation and concubinate.

Persons of the same sex who wish to "marry" can unofficially enter into gay or lesbian cohabitation, but they have no other legal option. They cannot get married because "marriage" has been doctrinally and judicially defined as a voluntary union for life of one man and one woman. Legal cohabitation was defined in the new Federal Constitution as "a stable union between man and woman" (Art. 226, § 3 Constituição Federal 1988). Therefore in Brazil at the moment, marriage or a cohabitation with legal status is defined as only involving members of the opposite sex.

A male person, who underwent transsexual surgery, cannot marry another man unless he had his birth register changed. According to legal writing and case law, this "marriage" is legally impossible (non-existent), on the ground of an essential inability to consummate the marriage with a person of the same sex. This relationship therefore will not be recognized or registered (Art. 29, II and Art. 69 Civil Registration Act of 1973).

Adoption of children

According to the new Children's Act of 1990 child adoption is possible for married and divorced people or those in a legal cohabitation (união estável) and single unmarried persons without discrimination. So it is legally possible for a single transsexual person to adopt a child. However the policy of the Children's Court, which decides on the basis of social and psychological expertises and "home studies" on the adoption decree, has in most cases been to refuse child adoption by homosexuals and transsexuals. This court and experts claim that these adoptions are against the best interests of the child and therefore against Art. 43 of the Children's Act of 1990. Nevertheless there have been many cases, where a single homosexual has been allowed to adopt an abandoned child. In such cases the court allowed the adoption for other reasons (e.g. family ties, previous contacts with the child, medical treatment of the child, etc.) without taking the lesbian or gay inclinations of this single person into consideration. Homosexual couples have more difficulties in escaping the general policy and normally a homosexual can only adopt a child as a single person.

Although there is no reference in legal writing to child adoption by a transsexual person, it is not actually forbidden or impossible under the current Brazilian laws on adoption. The literature up to now does not mention any such cases.

New tendencies in the question of transsexualism

Bills (Projetos de Lei)

The first attempt to create special legislation on transsexualism was made 17 years ago, with the Draft nr. 1.909/79, from the Chamber of Deputies (Câmara dos Deputados). According to this draft, which intended to introduce a new section into Art. 129 of the Brazilian Criminal Code, medical interventions that cause the ablation of organs or parts of a human body would no longer be considered a crime (bodily injury). This project was created especially to regulate the medical interventions for sex change. The project was passed by Parliament only in 1984. The problem of civil effects, in particular the name and sex change in the birth register after the medical intervention, were also discussed, but it was not included in the original draft approved by Parliament, because the deputies were more interested in the discriminalization than in the legal effects after the sex reassignment. The President of Brazil rejected that project (presidential veto), based on the polemic and doubtful nature of transsexualism. The legal issues concerning the sex and name change in the birth register and the criminal effects of medical intervention still call for a legal solution.

Perhaps a legal solution will come through with Draft nr. 70/1995, also submitted by the Chamber of Deputies. This new project is intended to regulate medical interventions for sex change by introducing a new section into Art. 129 of the Brazilian Criminal Code and Art. 58 of the Civil Registration Act. According to this Draft, the medical intervention would no longer be considered a crime, and after sex reassignment the transsexual could change his/her name in the birth register. Concerning the change of sex in the birth register, the Draft had at first proposed that in the birth register and identity card be written the word "transsexual" in stead of male or female. The author of this project intended to prevent misunderstandings within society. The Commission of Constitution and Justice of the Chamber of Deputies (Comissão de Constituição e Justiça) presented however two addenda to this draft, on the analogy of the Children's Adoption Act and made it possible to register the transsexual as female or as male.

This new Bill was passed by the Chamber of Deputies only on 10 May1995. The decriminalization of the medical intervention and the possibility to change the forename and sex in the birth register have to wait until the Brazilian Parliament approves the Bill and the President ratifies it.

Reaction of the Medical Profession

The medical intervention for sex change could have other implications according to current Brazilian legislation: the criminal responsibility of the surgeon. The Medical Association (Ordem dos Médicos) of São Paulo conceded the necessity of sex reassignment for the transsexual, but the Brazilian Federal Medical Association (Ordem dos Médicos do Brasil) has declined medical intervention, based on the uncertainty of criminal effects and an interpretation of Art. 32 of the Medical Code of Ethics. As a matter of fact, this Medical Code does not prohibit any necessary medical intervention in Brazil. However, the question of whether the transsexual medical intervention is necessary remains doubtful.

The lack of special legislation on these questions creates a situation of uncertainty for doctors and transsexual persons. The transsexuals in Brazil, seeking sex-change operation, either travel to other countries in which such operations are legal, or have the operations done secretly in private clinics somewhere in Brazil.

Conclusion

Sex change operations of transsexual persons can nowadays be considered to be a normal and regular medical treatment in many countries. In Brazil, however, the lack of special legislation creates a difficult situation for transsexuals. This legal uncertainty should be resolved, not by a judicial interpretation de lege ferenda or by analogy, as some single judges have done in Brazil, but by new legislation dealing particularly with this matter. This legislation should be as clear and as wide as possible so as to regulate all legal conditions and effects of sex change. Through this new concept, Brazilian legislation would no longer hinder sex changes, provided that it is medically prescribed and performed with all due medical care.

References

Barros, Inajá Guedes, Intersexualidade. Retificação de registro civil. Quesitos da Curadoria de Família, in: Revista dos Tribunais 655 (1992) 228-235.

Carvalho, Hilário Veiga de, Transexualismo. Diagnóstico. Conduta médica a ser adotada, in: Revista dos Tribunais 545 (1981) 289-304.

Chaves, Antônio, Direitos à vida, ao próprio corpo e às partes do mesmo (transplantes). Esterilização e operações cirúrgicas para "mudança de sexo". Direito ao cadáver e as partes do mesmo, in: Revista de Informação Legislativa, nr. 69 (1981) 125-168.

Chaves, Antônio, Castração. Esterilização. "Mudança" artificial de sexo, in: Revista de Informação Legislativa, nr. 69 (1981) 261-272.

Chaves, Antônio, Operações Cirúrgicas de mudança de sexo: a recusa de autorização de retificação de registro civil, in: Revista dos Tribunais 679 (1992) 7-14.

Chaves, Antônio, Direito à vida e ao próprio corpo (Intersexualidade, transexualidade e transplantes), 2. ed., Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo, 1994.

Juizado da Infância e da Juventude de Porto Alegre, Estatuto passado a limpo, Ed. Tribunal de Justiça/RGS, Porto Alegre, 1992.

Marietto, Carlos Eduardo Bruno, A operação de mudança de sexo e o ireito, in: Revista Forense 306 (1989) 23-27.

Oliveira, Basílio de, O concubinato e a Constituição de 1988, Ed. BVZ, Rio de Janeiro, 1992.

Pinto, Teresa Arruda Alvim, Um novo conceito de família, in: Direitos de Família e do Menor, Ed. Sálvio de Figueiredo Teixeira, Del Rey, Belo Horizonte, 1993.

Salgado, Murilo Rezende, O transexual e a cirurgia para a pretendida mudança de sexo, in: Revista dos Tribunais 491 (1976) 241-247.

Sutter, Matilde Josefina (Hojda), Determinação e mudança de sexo - aspectos médico-legais. Diss., São Paulo, Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo, 1993.

Sznick, Valdir, Aspectos Jurídicos da operação e mudança de sexo, in: Revista Forense 312 (1990) 336-340.

Wald, Arnoldo, Direito de Família, 9. ed., Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo, 1992.

Correspondence and requests for materials to:
Lima Marques, Claudia, J.C.D

University Rio Grande do Sul,
Porto Alegre, Brazil