User talk:Gokulchandola

Welcome

Hello, Gokulchandola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

Gokul Chandola

	Gokul Chandola
	Hallo, Gokulchandola (talk) 11:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For creating the artcle of Ashok Khemka --sarvajna (talk) 13:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Durga Shakti Nagpal

Hi, do you want to nominate the article in the DYK section? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Durga Shakti Nagpal

Hello! As you are one of the main contributors of the article Durga Shakti Nagpal, i am here to inform you that the article is now nominated for WP:DYK. The nomination can be found at Template:Did you know nominations/Durga Shakti Nagpal. Although it doesn't necessarily have a good chance of passing, for numerous reasons, i wish you good luck with it. Please try and address any issues that are raised there by reviewers. I and many others will also keep an eye on it and provide help. Good Luck and Good Job! Feel free to contact us. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

For edits in the article of Durga Shakti Nagpal -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Durga Shakti Nagpal

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian Space Research Organisation

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indian Space Research Organisation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian Space Research Organisation

The article Indian Space Research Organisation you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Indian Space Research Organisation for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletions

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: one of the top business schools in the India
• it's all about what the institute offers, little about the institute itself other than locations. How many students? lecturers? I would have thought this was basic information for an educational body
• You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
• I deleted your other institute too. The claim to be a top school was referenced to a site that could be edited by the institute, and th content was just a list of courses that were on offer, nothing factual about the institute

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• I should point out that if you just want the deleted text to improve, I can put in a sandbox for you. If you are challenging whether the article should have been deleted as it stood, that's obviously a matter for the Deletion Review Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I have reviewed your REFUND request, but the article is not suitable for restoration. Instead, I have "userfied" it to User:Gokulchandola/Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology where you can work on it. Jimfbleak has given you good advice about improving the article: I will add a little more.

• Read WP:Your first article
• Notice the need to provide references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability
• Do not use promotional language like "one of the top business schools"

When it is ready, click on the link "Submit the page!" in the box at the top. That will send it to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will look at it and either accept it or give you feedback. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Yogendra Yadav

I have reverted you at Yogendra Yadav. The source that you were using does indeed say some things but it didn't support any of the tagged statements that you removed in favour of it. If something is not in a source then your choices are to amend the statement to suit the source or leave the tag in situ and trust that someone else can resolve the issue. What you did amounted to "fake referencing". Please do not do this again. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Durga Shakti Nagpal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Durga Shakti Nagpal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (M.Y.S. Prasad) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating M.Y.S. Prasad, Gokulchandola!

Wikipedia editor Slashme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi there! I found your article on MYS Prasad while doing New Page reviews. I'm not sure whether he meets the notability criteria for academics, so I put a tag at the top of the article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(academics).

To reply, leave a comment on Slashme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your dedication to Wikipedia, and for all the articles you have created! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 17:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Naveen JaiHind

Yes Naveen JaiHind is received significant coverage in Haryana newspapers now a days. He is newly joined politics that's why not much details or record on his name. Please don't delete this page. You can suggest what should be updated in this page.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaveenJaihind (talk • contribs) 13:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Haryana legislative assembly election, 2005

Hi, I'm Nechlison. Gokulchandola, thanks for creating Haryana legislative assembly election, 2005!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Try to resolve your issues in the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nechlison (talk) 12:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Balli Singh Cheema

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Balli Singh Cheema requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 16:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Durga Shakti Nagpal/GA1

In case you're not aware of this —Vensatry _(Ping) 04:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2014, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shyamsunder (talk) 22:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Durga Shakti Nagpal

The article Durga Shakti Nagpal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Durga Shakti Nagpal for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 19:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sam Manekshaw you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw

The article Sam Manekshaw you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sam Manekshaw for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of B Janardhan Reddy

Hello Gokulchandola,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged B Janardhan Reddy for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dudel250 (talk) 04:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Bride of the World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bride of the World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bride of the World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hobit (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Anukriti Gusain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anukriti Gusain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anukriti Gusain (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian general election, 2019

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indian general election, 2019, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lixxx235 (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)