Login to access exclusive gaming content, win competition prizes
and post on our forums. Don't have an account? Create one now!
Why should you join?
Click here for full benefits!
Follow our Twitter feed#Splitsecond : Velocity review is go, go, go! (And bang, bang, bang!) http://bit.ly/9NnUhB
SIGN IN/JOIN UP
GamesForumsCheatsStore
Total War studio hiring for sports game | Treyarch tackles Black Ops multiplayer concerns | Dead Space 2 screenshots emerge | SFX names ultimate sci-fi games | Romero (finally) apologises for Daikatana ads | Epic: Piracy has killed our enthusiasm for PC | Split/Second is 'Burnout evolved', says Disney | Mass Effect 2 patch addresses mining | Alpha Protocol trailer gets international | Assassin's Creed 2 Complete Edition detailed | New Need for Speed title is... | Splinter Cell 'Insurgency Pack' dated | EA: Bungie deal still possible | Capcom: No more new IP for western devs | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood screenshot out | Zombie mode coming to Black Ops? | Japan doesn't have 'hope in hell' - Capcom producer | Red Dead Redemption banned in UAE? | UK CHART: FIFA tops Alan Wake | Star Wars: Battlefront 3 leaked? | First Lara and The Guardian of Light gameplay video | GTA 5 to show at E3, predicts analyst | Epic 'nervous' over Unreal Engine 4 | Fable 3 PC: 'Stay tuned,' says MS | Cliffy B: 'Mass Effect is Star Wars of our generation'
All|PC|PlayStation|Xbox|Nintendo|Download PC Games
Search CVG
Computer And Video Games - The latest gaming news, reviews, previews & movies
Join CVG on Facebook!
CVG Home » PC » Reviews
PreviousAliens vs. Predator PCResident Evil 5 Gold Edition WII, PC, PS3, 360Next

Star Trek Online Review

Paul Presley launches his quantum torpedoes at Cryptic
We've all wanted a Star Trek-based online world for many, many years now. We've dreamed about it, plotted it out, made our plans for what we'd do, gotten excited over potential, and then steadied ourselves in moist anticipation once it was finally announced that the dream would be turned into reality all those press releases ago. And they've given us... well, a travesty.

Star Trek Online is almost comically bad in execution, an obvious sufferer of rushed production schedules, inept design and very, very poor execution.

At its base level, Star Trek Online puts every player in command of their own starship, complete with an automated crew, throws a mix of spaceship and ground combat at you, and coats it all in every Trek reference you could think of. Which sounds OK, until you play it and realise that none of it gels and everything has been horribly crowbarred into Cryptic's existing MMO format. A setup that, as anyone who's played Champions Online will tell you, was never that great to begin with.

MARRED TREK
Not all the blame can be thrust in Cryptic's direction, mind you. When you look at Star Trek in the cold, hard light of day, you quickly start to realise how awkward the universe's structure is for an MMO interpretation. Just to cite two examples: the Federation doesn't use any form of currency, and 90% of any classic Trek episode is actors talking to each other: hardly the stuff of low-attention span gaming greatness.

But what really saddens the game-loving heart is how clear it is that, even with the challenges in front of it, Cryptic haven't even tried to make the most rudimentary attempts to translate the true spirit of Star Trek - that force of nature that can survive multiple awful films, several turgid spin-off shows and a host of God-awful cash-in novels and merchandise.

You can almost see the developers at Cryptic looking at the huge whiteboard of All Things Trek in the initial stages of design, realising the amount of creative effort that would be required to pull anything decent off, and just saying "Ah sod it, let's re-skin the Champions engine and make a basic combat game instead."

It's not like there isn't precedent to try this stuff. BioWare is busy creating a solid-looking story-based MMO with Star Wars: The Old Republic. EVE Online has shown that a space-based MMO doesn't have to be all about fighting. And just about every MMO under the sun includes guild structure tools that let multiple players team up and follow orders, provide unique roles in situations and contribute to a greater end result in different and meaningful ways. Are you honestly telling me that we couldn't have had ships made up of multiple bridge positions, with the guild leader sitting in the Captain's role and not have had a meaningful Star Trek experience?

That's what comes across most when you play STO: the sheer level of laziness in the development. Of course it looks lovely, yes all the words are correct, the nods to content from the rich Trek history is all there - from pet tribbles to the Guardian of Time, from raktajino to the Crystalline Entity - you literally can't move for fanboy-sating references. But none of it feels as though it's being used in any sort of meaningful way. It's all just being thrown at you as if to say "See! See! It's Star Trek! Lap it up!" regardless of whether any of it makes narrative or logical sense.

So that's why this really doesn't cut the mustard in terms of being a decent Star Trek property. What of its actual gaming credentials? Does it at least have the saving grace of being fun to play, regardless of narrative accuracy? No, it most assuredly does not.

STAR TRUDGE
Using the term 'game' to describe Star Trek Online is really pushing the definition of that word to its outer limits. Most games have some sense of challenge to them, some potential for failure in order to keep things interesting. Even MMOs, with their lax attitude towards character death, usually at least try to make the content engaging, varied and difficult enough to disguise the grind at work behind the scenes.

STO has none of that. For all the pretty colours and fancy ship models on display, there is no challenge on offer. The much-vaunted tactical ship combat very quickly becomes a basic case of flying in circles pressing 'fire all' when the countdown timers run down, and since there's no death penalty worth a damn, there's simply no reason to worry if you get blown up as you'll just re-spawn 10 seconds later and jump back into the fray at full strength again.

This is attrition gaming at its worst. You never fail to progress, it might just take a few re-spawns to get there (although even that miniscule threat is practically eliminated when you're in a team), but any progression you make isn't going to come about through any displays of gaming skill or tactical nous, you just hang on long enough, pushing the same two buttons when they light up and eventually you'll be an Admiral.

It's not even as if the enemies offer any threat. When they're not getting themselves stuck inside scenery (a very common bug), they just go through their one party trick (throwing out mines, cloaking for 10 seconds, whatever) while turning around in circles around you, waiting to explode.

MR SPOOK
On the ground it's no better. In fact, it's far, far worse. For all its flaws, ship combat at least somehow manages to offer a smidge of interest with the four-sided shield system (although don't be fooled into thinking this is a 3-D game - that's yet another illusion. Like Khan, STO displays very two-dimensional thinking).

When you're planetside, STO manages to capture all of the worst aspects of MMO gaming from the last five years - tiny zones, limited variety, the same three or four character models being used over and over again, little in the way of effective communication tools, overly confusing on-screen cues, no strategic gameplay and again, nothing in the way of meaningful challenge.

Ground missions do make some attempt to capture the flavour of the various TV shows, but again, only by referencing Star Trek touchstones. The gameplay boils down to either shooting your way past loads of enemies in order to press the action key on a particular mission goal, or just running around empty landscapes, pressing 'scan' five times when you're told to. No challenge, no thought, pure grind.

I can't say this enough, with sufficient stress or in any more effective a font: Star Trek Online is not a game. Not by any measurable yardstick. Neither is it an effective online social space (the other vital component for any decent MMO title), as it offers little in the way of communication tools, player meeting spaces or guild functionality.

There are occasional flashes of inspiration - I genuinely like the auto teaming aspect when you enter a mission area for instance; this addresses a typical MMO bugbear of pick-up grouping - but there aren't enough of these touches to warrant setting up a monthly drain on your bank account.

So, with all that having been said, there is left one niggling question - why, for all the many, many, many faults on display here, do I keep wanting to return to the thing?

Star Trek Online does one thing well - just one thing, but I've found that for many people, that one thing is enough: it provides enough fanboy service to help the diehard Star Trek fans look past the fact that the game is beyond terrible.

The basic fact is that if this was the exact same game but without any of the Trek trappings, no one would give it the time of day. As it is, Trek fans have been wanting an online universe to lose themselves in for years now and as flawed as this is, it's all they've got and by God, they're going to take it.

Annoyingly, this means that the online game that Trek really deserves isn't likely to ever get made any time soon. Still, Star Wars has survived the mess that was Galaxies and looks like being given decent service by The Old Republic. So there's still hope something similar will happen to Trek.

Right now, Star Trek Online is a mess of a title with little to recommend beyond the novelty of flying around in a replica of the Enterprise. As soon as that novelty wears off (ideally within the 30-day trial period), this will be one universe badly in need of a reboot.

PC Zone Magazine
// Overview
Verdict
Worse than Star Trek V
Uppers
  Graphically very pleasing
  Fanboy service
Downers
  Offers no challenges
  Fails to capture the true Trek
  Piss-poor MMO experience
  Feels lazily designed
// Screenshots
// Interactive
Share this article:  
Digg.comFacebookGoogle BookmarksN4GGamerblips
del.icio.usRedditSlashdot.orgStumbleUpon
 
Read all 10 commentsPost a Comment
ouch, Ouch, and thrice OUCH.

It's true though, the ground combat is utterly uninspired and totally dreary, and there's not enough diversity of missions to make this game really worthwhile.

Played the beta for about 10 hours to discover I'd seen pretty much all I cared to see.

0 longevity.
Karis on 12 Mar '10
Absolutely spot on review

All I find to do is fight fight and fight again.... only real roleplaying i get is making costumes showing my friends. Isn't that what an mmo is for making things and displaying them to show your mates, or spending hours chatting with a virtual replica of yourself.. They seem to have forgotten this and made a game that parts of would just as easily be a multiplayer level of say Elite force.

Oh and forget joining a ground or space team for that matter your about as likely to get healed or buffed by others as seening a flying pink moose. Rolling Eyes They are so used to Bridge officers doing this they don't even bother. So much for healers. Call me mad (your mad ! Shocked ) but don't MMOs usually involve a team of say a Tank, a Healer, and some other types ?

It seams when cryptic made this and Champions they decided oh lets make it Single player with the element of having everyone on one server so they don't get lonely. I know i got to level 40 on CO then thought now what ?

Theres a few things ive posted on their forums about what might help the game bar a complete rethink.

This game is really just a standin while everyone waits for the Starwars game to come out.. Which hopefully will have a deceent character maker and HOPEFULLY some player housing or failing that a place to put stuff to show it off.
Livingdeadjedi on 12 Mar '10
Did the reviewer really get that far to assume no challenge.

There are many flaws, but I've had missions that were nigh on impossible without calling pals for support?

Sapce combat rocks and ground combat, while not as polished as WoW is still ok IMO (not a hardcoree MMO'er though).

Just go to the borg sector and again was challenging, it does need more mission styles for sure. But in it's infancy I think it's much better than the majority of reviews state.

If you like ST you will enjoy aspects, just be sure to get to Rear admiral at least before passing judgment
c3dpo on 12 Mar '10
Did the reviewer really get that far to assume no challenge.

There are many flaws, but I've had missions that were nigh on impossible without calling pals for support?

blushes Embarassed i managed to get to RA 3 times Solo EmbarassedEmbarassed its all to easy
Livingdeadjedi on 12 Mar '10
Its an awfull awfull game and made me realise that Star Wars is alot better than i gave it credit.
5/10 is to high id say 3/10. Its truely that bad not even an MMO.
davelk on 12 Mar '10
To be brutally honest this would rock if it were resold as a single player game with some tweaks. (there ya go cryptic free idea for ya Razz )
But seems Cryptic would rather get the 14 and 15 year olds to give them money each month.

I am hoping it gets better i really am
Livingdeadjedi on 12 Mar '10
Ha! Even the positive points in the review are negatives!

- Graphically it’s about 10 years behind the mark with underwhelming textures, models and characters that all look like twins, even if they’re from different races. And no, you can’t blame those aliens that seeded humanoid genetic code through the galaxy this time! On the up side, I can now go back and play the original Deus Ex and marvel in awe at the graphics once again.

- The only service this game does to fan boys is lighten wallets and kick teeth.

There are no words that currently exist that can describe how much of an epic the fail of this game is. Maybe there will be one in 2409.
Apollonius on 13 Mar '10
The review - fair enough, looks pretty dire from what I've seen and read and about what I sadly expected, but please stop confusing fanboys with fans. Twice in the review you refferred to Star-Trek fans as fanboys, something which some may find offensive(including me). As we all know a fanboy is typically immature in age and mind(among other things)and believes in something so strongly they deny all logic or reason to the contrary, make grand, bold claims(which often turn out to be false)with no evidence or logic to back up thier argument whatsoever and when beat in a discussion sink to verbally abuse the competition rather than give more thought to their ridiculous, false claims. A fan is a normal person who is very interetsed in a particular subject matter and may(depending on the subject in question)collect merchandise or media accosiated with their chosen subject. Hardly confusing is it?
sonic_uk on 14 Mar '10
Does anybody who isnt 35-45, bald, fat, below 5ft5, who hasn't got more acne than the band camp following of the entire american mid-west and doesnt live in thier Mother's basement....actually give a s**t?
ryddah on 14 Mar '10
www.startrekonline-credits.com is a online store that sell star trek online products such as:
Star trek online credits, Star trek online gold, Star trek online power leveling, Star trek online items, Star trek online accounts, Star trek online Marks of exploration and honor

24/7 live support great service, fast safe and reliable service.

At our website you'll find detailed information, about a lot of items in the game, and also the items you could be rewarded for marks of honor and exploration, you'll also have the ability to purchase these items and services.
netameta2 on 4 May '10
Read all 10 commentsPost a Comment
// Screenshots
PreviousNext5 / 10 Screenshots
// Related Content
Reviews:
Previews:
Interviews:
News:
More Related
Star Trek Online Gold Editionfrom £22.99
Cool Shop UKIn Stock£22.99
PriceMinister UKIn Stock£32.81
GamePlayOut of Stock£34.99
Star Trek Onlinefrom £17.93
AsdaNo Information£17.93
ZavviNo Information£17.95
GameseekIn Stock£29.97
// The Best ofCVG
Get FREE games at FileRadar.
News | Reviews | Previews | Features | Interviews | Cheats | Hardware | Forums | Competitions | Blogs
Top Games: Unreal Tournament III | Football Manager 2007 | Medieval 2: Total War | Bulletstorm | Dead Space 2 | Doctor Who Episodes
F1 2010 | TERA | Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands | Age of Conan: Rise of the Godslayer | FIFA Online
Top Reviews: Tiger Woods PGA Tour Online | Dragon Age: Origins - Awakening | Resident Evil 5 Gold Edition | Star Trek Online | Aliens vs. Predator | Napoleon: Total War
Aliens vs Predator | Borderlands: The Zombie Island of Dr. Ned | Borderlands: Mad Moxxi's Underdome Riot | Stalker: Call of Pripyat | Lord of the Rings Online: Siege of Mirkwood
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited,
Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW
England and Wales company registration number 2008885