Nintendo's announced that it plans to release the Nintendo 3DS, the handheld that will "succeed" the current DS before March next year.
The announcement was made in a newly released investor report, which says, "...games can be enjoyed with 3D effects without the need for any special glasses." - Pretty massive.
The report also says that the 3DS will succeed the DS Series and will support backwards compatibility for DS and DSi software.
Here's an English translation of the 3DS press release for your further scrutiny:
"Nintendo Co., Ltd.(Minami-ward of Kyoto-city, President Satoru Iwata) will launch "Nintendo 3DS"(temp) during the fiscal year ending March 2011, on which games can be enjoyed with 3D effects without the need for any special glasses.
"Nintendo 3DS"(temp) is going to be the new portable game machine to succeed "Nintendo DS series", whose cumulative consolidated sales from Nintendo amounted to 125million units as of the end of December 2009, and will include backward compatibility so that the software for Nintendo DS series, including the ones for Nintendo DSi, can also be enjoyed.
We are planning to announce additional details at E3 show, which is scheduled to be held from June 15, 2010 at Los Angeles in the U.S."
so just spent my money on the dsxl and i already know its dead in the water as next installment of the ds franchise is already gonna blow this one away. what a waste of time and money from my part.
As far as I'm concerned, the only true 3D gaming experience without the need for glasses, is stickle bricks...Also, I can't believe Nintendo are releasing another console, especially considering I bought one once. I thought that once id bought one, then they would never ever release another console, so my game and watch is obsolete now and I'm sat here with egg on my face.
i see a problem; the DS can BARELY do 3d, so 3d gaming is a bit hard to do without 3d graphics.
unless of course they want to do paper mario, where it looks like bits of paper in 3d. but then that defeats the point of it being a 2d game does it not?
Oh my god, now Nintendo are copying Sony with their 3D gaming!
When will it end?!!
Seriously though, it sounds more than a little interesting.
Just how will they achieve 3D gaming without the need for glasses?
You do know that there are already screens in existence which give the 3D effect without glasses don't you? They are practically useless for normal tvs as only one person gets to watch at one time as there is a sweet spot for viewing (although head tracking sets allow that 1 person to move around). Other sets have been developed that allow for three or so sweet spots but these are fixed and do not track movement. However for a handheld this tech would be fine as it is so rare that more than one person is looking at the screen and the user is almost always going to be in the sweet spot.
I am still unconvinced by 3D though and would be interested to see if it induces nausea for games. We will soon see though.
i see a problem; the DS can BARELY do 3d, so 3d gaming is a bit hard to do without 3d graphics.
unless of course they want to do paper mario, where it looks like bits of paper in 3d. but then that defeats the point of it being a 2d game does it not?
This is a new console! It is not a DS with a 3d screen!
As far as I'm concerned, the only true 3D gaming experience without the need for glasses, is stickle bricks...Also, I can't believe Nintendo are releasing another console, especially considering I bought one once. I thought that once id bought one, then they would never ever release another console, so my game and watch is obsolete now and I'm sat here with egg on my face.
That will teach you for not waiting you crazy tech head
Oh my god, now Nintendo are copying Sony with their 3D gaming!
Just how will they achieve 3D gaming without the need for glasses?
Maybe it'll be like one of those old 'magic eye' pictures that you have to stare at for 20 minutes to get working. There's gonna be a lot of cross-eyed kids sitting on the bus next year.
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced. 3D without glasses is easy on a handheld because only one person is looking at the screen. I think ill wait for the full spec's before i decide to buy it
Wow, pretty cool. Took me a while to fully understand this is in fact a new handheld. But as it's backwards compatible with the DS, we can expect 2 screens, at least one touch sensitive. I'm loving the 3D idea though, knew they'd have something more interesting that just "gamecube power, 2 bigger screens, accelerometer"
to get a 3D effect without glasses is for the screen to display two images that have filters that are applied to create the effect .. think of it as the Screen wearing 3d galsses internally and you see the result.
problem is the resolution isn't that great on the TV's that do that, so how it's going to be on a handheld system i have no idea.. not to mention cost.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWAg1s7xfz0&feature=player_embedded this is probably how it will work. Take note, this is a current generation dsiware game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWAg1s7xfz0&feature=player_embedded this is probably how it will work. Take note, this is a current generation dsiware game.
i suppose that with a users head being in such close proximity the on board camera could easily track a users head movements and adjust the scene accordingly
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
so just spent my money on the dsxl and i already know its dead in the water as next installment of the ds franchise is already gonna blow this one away. what a waste of time and money from my part.
You do realize you bought something from Nintendo?, ..specially known for making mass-versions of a version of a version?
Sorry to hear that, but it was kinda expected, they do like to make plenty of versions so they can keep raking in the money.
They're unlikely to release a dubious handheld - they'll innovate once again and continue to dominate the handheld market.
They're 3d tech is their key differentiating element which they hope will make their product stand head and shoulder above apple products, and other mobile devices.
Nintendo aren't stupid guys. They're shrewd business monkeys.
I said that Nintendo would enter the world of 3D gaming. Admittedly I said it about the next Wii (which might be right yet...) but even then people just laughed and said they wouldn't be interested. I said they would because it was gimmicky and now they have. I'm a better analyst than all those other pretenders.
Had a feeling they would have a new handheld out soon. Normally its like clockwork around the release and marketing of a third version of their current handheld but in this case its around their fourth. They go and make folk spend Ł159.99 RRP on the DSi XL and then all of a sudden it's "Oh hai guyz, thank you for spending Ł159.99 on the DSi XL but now we have a brand spanking new successor handheld on the way that you may be interested in" Customer:
Normally I don't buy any model after the original but this time I bought the DS Phat on release at Ł99.99 (the RRP) and then bought an original DSi at release which cost me Ł149.99(the RRP) and now I feel ripped off too.
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
CHeck out this video from 2004, the creator of Move, using a camera to track move like controlers. Im not saying that SOny havent taking 'ideas' from Wii, (like Nunchuck and accelerometer) but this shows that Move has been on the cards for a long time.
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
CHeck out this video from 2004, the creator of Move, using a camera to track move like controlers. Im not saying that SOny havent taking 'ideas' from Wii, (like Nunchuck and accelerometer) but this shows that Move has been on the cards for a long time.
You Tube
All that is is the camera tracking coloured balls. This was being done by a few companies (including sony) at the time of the eyetoy release. Uses this to help with the pointer but the majority of the Move controller is pretty much an exact copy of the wii controllers even down to the nunchuck type secondary controller.
i suppose that with a users head being in such close proximity the on board camera could easily track a users head movements and adjust the scene accordingly
I doubt they would go the that expense when the user is almost always viewing from the sweet spot.
There are 3D tellies in the Xscape near us that seem to use a sort of lenticular system (at least that's what it looks like to me) but it's very strange. They have a demo running where these cubes appear to rotate out of the screen. It looks ok but is a bit of a strain on the eyes. Nintendo tend to only do these sort of things when they can do thm properly though, so maybe they are on to something. I remember in the early days of GB that they had a colour version working well years before it was actually released, but they held it back because of the battery life. They wanted the best experience so they waited until that could be achieved. It's going to be an interesting year...
There are 3D tellies in the Xscape near us that seem to use a sort of lenticular system (at least that's what it looks like to me) but it's very strange. They have a demo running where these cubes appear to rotate out of the screen. It looks ok but is a bit of a strain on the eyes. Nintendo tend to only do these sort of things when they can do thm properly though, so maybe they are on to something. I remember in the early days of GB that they had a colour version working well years before it was actually released, but they held it back because of the battery life. They wanted the best experience so they waited until that could be achieved. It's going to be an interesting year...
That the MK Xscape? Saw them when I was there last - looked absolutely shocking.
Apparently Nvidia are making the graphics chip for it, using their in development Tegra 2 chip. Here's a video of it running a modified UT3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpGtu_ZkwqA
No it was the Castleford one but I believe they are the same. The effect made me blink and try and re-focus a lot but it did give a sort of 3D impression. It's got to be better than that. I've also looked at that demo on Kotaku and that is quite a clever take on the 3D and exists now. It'll probably be something like that - depth of field rather than poppy-outy (that's a recognised industry term btw)
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
CHeck out this video from 2004, the creator of Move, using a camera to track move like controlers. Im not saying that SOny havent taking 'ideas' from Wii, (like Nunchuck and accelerometer) but this shows that Move has been on the cards for a long time.
You Tube
All that is is the camera tracking coloured balls. This was being done by a few companies (including sony) at the time of the eyetoy release. Uses this to help with the pointer but the majority of the Move controller is pretty much an exact copy of the wii controllers even down to the nunchuck type secondary controller.
That's what I was getting at. And I'm sure Nintendo didn't just cobble the wiimote idea/tech together just before E3 2005(?).
People have been looking at motion control for years - the DC was using it for Sega Bass Fishing, Samba etc before the PS2 was even released. In fact if Nintendo copied anyone, it's probably Sega. Their arcade heritage was great for innovation like this.
Anyway, Gordon Brown won't be getting a 3DS I assume.
I'm sure they know what they're doing, but i have to admit that i'm a little disappointed. - I'd much rather have had a more traditional handheld, sporting GameCube quality graphics and with the ability to download from the Gamecube's back catalogue. - I guess i shouldn't be surprised anymore by Nintendo's eagerness to innovate and push boundaries. - It's just that by saying the system will be backwards compatible with DS strongly suggests that graphical capability will remain similar. - Admittedly, graphical capability remains slightly less important than accessible gaming on handhelds, but they really should start to push their own tech forward, in terms of visuals.
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
CHeck out this video from 2004, the creator of Move, using a camera to track move like controlers. Im not saying that SOny havent taking 'ideas' from Wii, (like Nunchuck and accelerometer) but this shows that Move has been on the cards for a long time.
You Tube
All that is is the camera tracking coloured balls. This was being done by a few companies (including sony) at the time of the eyetoy release. Uses this to help with the pointer but the majority of the Move controller is pretty much an exact copy of the wii controllers even down to the nunchuck type secondary controller.
That's what I was getting at. And I'm sure Nintendo didn't just cobble the wiimote idea/tech together just before E3 2005(?).
People have been looking at motion control for years - the DC was using it for Sega Bass Fishing, Samba etc before the PS2 was even released. In fact if Nintendo copied anyone, it's probably Sega. Their arcade heritage was great for innovation like this.
Anyway, Gordon Brown won't be getting a 3DS I assume.
Unless it does use headtracking as per these videos that are floating around. Then he could.
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Nice! There are a few from off topic here - http://forums.computerandvideogames.com/viewtopic.php?t=104029
This is one I did a few weeks back - http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/cameron.php?poster=127186
For the record, I have no political allegiance!
I was on the fence until I saw that poster. True story.
I suggest you base your vote on issues and policies rather than posters........
Or is that just me being dumb.....?
That type of logical thinking doesn't work these days! I don't think you understand how modern politics works dude - it's all about the PR/spin!
Considering Simon Cowell told Newsnight he would be interested in making a political show, it COULD happen!! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/8412617.stm
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
CHeck out this video from 2004, the creator of Move, using a camera to track move like controlers. Im not saying that SOny havent taking 'ideas' from Wii, (like Nunchuck and accelerometer) but this shows that Move has been on the cards for a long time.
You Tube
All that is is the camera tracking coloured balls. This was being done by a few companies (including sony) at the time of the eyetoy release. Uses this to help with the pointer but the majority of the Move controller is pretty much an exact copy of the wii controllers even down to the nunchuck type secondary controller.
Thats exactly what I said, while its clear some aspects have been borrowed from Nintendo, it wasn't just a case of "look, people by motion crap, lets do some". They have been working on it for a long time.
When it comes down to it, whenever anyone has a good idea in any industry, people will copy it.
Otherwise, we'd all be driving cars with heavy steering, and actually have to unlock doors with a key, and we'd all still be using Atari style joysticks, or even a Pong style paddle
Does every thread have to revolve around one console copying the other. For your info PS move was being developed before wii was announced.
And do you think they announced the Wii before they started developing that?
I don't even get where this story of Sony developing Move before the wii comes from. All I've seen is them using the Eyetoy for tracking. That's more like Natal, not wii. Accelerometers are totally different.
There have been various motion controls for years, but Sony copied Nintendo on this one. It's no big deal, they all take ideas and change/improve them.
CHeck out this video from 2004, the creator of Move, using a camera to track move like controlers. Im not saying that SOny havent taking 'ideas' from Wii, (like Nunchuck and accelerometer) but this shows that Move has been on the cards for a long time.
You Tube
All that is is the camera tracking coloured balls. This was being done by a few companies (including sony) at the time of the eyetoy release. Uses this to help with the pointer but the majority of the Move controller is pretty much an exact copy of the wii controllers even down to the nunchuck type secondary controller.
Thats exactly what I said, while its clear some aspects have been borrowed from Nintendo, it wasn't just a case of "look, people by motion crap, lets do some". They have been working on it for a long time.
When it comes down to it, whenever anyone has a good idea in any industry, people will copy it.
Otherwise, we'd all be driving cars with heavy steering, and actually have to unlock doors with a key, and we'd all still be using Atari style joysticks, or even a Pong style paddle
Agreed, however I think it is the way they have even ripped off the general design of the wiimote too that has drawn the main criticism. They could have at least come up with their own design..... it smacks of being rushed out to compete with wii.
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Nice! There are a few from off topic here - http://forums.computerandvideogames.com/viewtopic.php?t=104029
This is one I did a few weeks back - http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/cameron.php?poster=127186
For the record, I have no political allegiance!
I was on the fence until I saw that poster. True story.
I suggest you base your vote on issues and policies rather than posters........
Or is that just me being dumb.....?
For me, the problem isn't the poster itself, it's the attitude of the man who felt it was appropriate to allow the poster in the first place.
His smugness for doing so says a lot to me about him, his attitude and his ability to govern.
I care more about whether I think he'll do a good job of running the country than how pretty he looks on a poster. Clearly he doesn't.
And what about the attitude of the man that felt it appropriate to allow this Poster?
As I say best to ignore the posters and focus on the policies.
I disagree. The intricacies like these are what really tell us the truth about politicians. I'd rather have a bloke in power who turns to a blithering idiot when he tries to do PR, but you know works damned hard - even if he does make mistakes, than some smug git who thinks he's got number 10 in the bag, and rides his whole campaign on disagreeing with the competition.
For a long time now I've realised that their policies aren't generally worth the paper they're written on.
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
Nice! There are a few from off topic here - http://forums.computerandvideogames.com/viewtopic.php?t=104029
This is one I did a few weeks back - http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/cameron.php?poster=127186
For the record, I have no political allegiance!
I was on the fence until I saw that poster. True story.
I suggest you base your vote on issues and policies rather than posters........
Or is that just me being dumb.....?
For me, the problem isn't the poster itself, it's the attitude of the man who felt it was appropriate to allow the poster in the first place.
His smugness for doing so says a lot to me about him, his attitude and his ability to govern.
I care more about whether I think he'll do a good job of running the country than how pretty he looks on a poster. Clearly he doesn't.
And what about the attitude of the man that felt it appropriate to allow this Poster?
As I say best to ignore the posters and focus on the policies.
I disagree. The intricacies like these are what really tell us the truth about politicians. I'd rather have a bloke in power who turns to a blithering idiot when he tries to do PR, but you know works damned hard - even if he does make mistakes, than some smug git who thinks he's got number 10 in the bag, and rides his whole campaign on disagreeing with the competition.
For a long time now I've realised that their policies aren't generally worth the paper they're written on.
A FEW MISTAKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and lies, and lies and lies and li...............
Never trust a man who scares children with his smile............
(and yes that did require that many exclamation marks)
Good point. Lucky old Gordon, I think he might have some more time on his hands next year anyway!
And just because it's backwards compatible doesn't mean it won't have better graphics. My old DS Tank played GBA games and the DS graphics were a generation ahead of the GBA.
You mean this hasn't put you off voting Conservative?!
I've changed my mind. - My initial reaction was that it all sounded a bit 'DSI'. Just another slightly enhanced version of the DS, but as more info trickles through, it's all beginning to sound rather exciting. I can't wait for E3! Who the hell cares about Natal anymore?!
I've changed my mind. - My initial reaction was that it all sounded a bit 'DSI'. Just another slightly enhanced version of the DS, but as more info trickles through, it's all beginning to sound rather exciting. I can't wait for E3! Who the hell cares about Natal anymore?!
Well I'm not really sure how a 3D handheld really effects the 360's motion device, but I'm glad I didn't by a DSi or DSiXL now!
I've changed my mind. - My initial reaction was that it all sounded a bit 'DSI'. Just another slightly enhanced version of the DS, but as more info trickles through, it's all beginning to sound rather exciting. I can't wait for E3! Who the hell cares about Natal anymore?!
Well I'm not really sure how a 3D handheld really effects the 360's motion device, but I'm glad I didn't by a DSi or DSiXL now!
It doesn't. - It was a tongue in cheek remark. - Just meant that this was exciting and interesting news and certainly what i'll be looking forward to seeing at E3, as opposed to some Microsoft execs jumping around infront of a tv screen.
Usuarly what the 3D glasses do is "shutter" each frame alternatively ,if those frames are correctly worked out in colours etc to just appeal to 1 of the eyes the end result is the 3D stereoscopic view.
Now ,with a propietary LCD display that can shutter the frames as you wish and software content that has to be approved by Nintendo (and guided until then) to met the standards of the hardware its pretty easy to do this.
Its way more difficult to pull this off in the home consoles ,that have to work with non-propietary TVs of multiple standards and that work with tons of different and unapproved content.
You would have to look at the screen head on, which i guess isn't a problem but Nintendo will have to change their adverts in which two people are playing the same game.
I've changed my mind. - My initial reaction was that it all sounded a bit 'DSI'. Just another slightly enhanced version of the DS, but as more info trickles through, it's all beginning to sound rather exciting. I can't wait for E3! Who the hell cares about Natal anymore?!
Well I'm not really sure how a 3D handheld really effects the 360's motion device, but I'm glad I didn't by a DSi or DSiXL now!
It doesn't. - It was a tongue in cheek remark. - Just meant that this was exciting and interesting news and certainly what i'll be looking forward to seeing at E3, as opposed to some Microsoft execs jumping around infront of a tv screen.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited, Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW England and Wales company registration number 2008885
