Login to access exclusive gaming content, win competition prizes
and post on our forums. Don't have an account? Create one now!
Why should you join?
Click here for full benefits!
Follow our Twitter feedModern Warfare 2 DLC "exclusively first" on 360: http://tiny.cc/z8495
SIGN IN/JOIN UP
GamesForumsCheatsStore
FIFA 'beating the heck out of Pro Evo' | Fable III reveal next month | Greenpeace report slams Nintendo... again | Official: Heavy Rain out Feb 26 | Microsoft: 3D still has hurdles to clear | The greatest Nintendo gaming moment of all time is... | Ninety-Nine Nights II release date "spring" | EA plans 'attack' on Call Of Duty success | Bayonetta does Playboy | Microsoft treating Natal 'as a new console' | Call of Duty MMO is a go? | This week's Nintendo downloads | Nintendo's first Wii game for 2010 is... | Red Dead Redemption screenshots | God Of War 3 is a 'must have' - Sony | Heavy Rain release date outed for US | Left 4 Dead 2 gets free Xbox weekend | Modern Warfare 2 supremo making graphic novel | Halo Reach image leaks | Lost Planet 2 screens uncovered | Dead Or Alive 5 "in production" for PS3 | 10 new countries to get XBL Video Marketplace | Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars screens | Blomkamp on District 9 game (fooking prawns) | Modern Warfare 2 DLC "exclusively first" on 360
All|PC|PlayStation|Xbox|Nintendo|Download PC Games
Search CVG
Computer And Video Games - The latest gaming news, reviews, previews & movies
CVG Home » News
PreviousNo God of War III date for "good few weeks" Halo Reach "THE biggest title of 2010"  Next

Battlefield: Bad Company was 'too hard'

Developer says title was overly challenging - as it primes sequel
The studio behind Battlefield: Bad Company has admitted that it made it "too hard" to kill people in the game - and revealed that it has toned down the difficulty in the second installment.

The shooter was released by EA back in 2008 to a warm critical reception.

But developer DICE said this week that it didn't think the 'pacing' of the game was right.

Producer Gordon Van Dyke told PC Zone that the problem had been rectified for the second title in the series - due out on PC, Xbox 360 and PS3 in March.

"I think we made it too hard to kill people [in the first game]," he commented.

"In a shooter game people want to kill people. So we've upped damage and the pacing is a lot better, it's tuned more.

"I think Battlefield as a whole, we've been doing it so long we're like a chef who knows the exact amount of spice to put in if they want it a little bit spicier, or how to make it a little more savoury or a little more sweet."

Click here to read PC Zone's full preview of Battlefield: Bad Company 2 on CVG.

computerandvideogames.com
// Interactive
Share this article:  
Digg.comFacebookGoogle BookmarksN4GGamerblips
del.icio.usRedditSlashdot.orgStumbleUpon
 
Read all 14 commentsPost a Comment
ok so they have seen a problem with the first one are we going to see a patch??

i guess not.
footieharry on 7 Jan '10
god. they are dumbing it down to snare the COD crowd. fucking no! bad!!

the killcam inclusion is bad enough for retarded idiots flapping about. get those $ signs out your eyes and give as a decent game - the first BC was not too hard. nothing like it, even in a toughened difficulty.

mass market bastards. doing our games over.
svd_grasshopper on 7 Jan '10
The killcam is one of the worst design decisions in a game. Yes is might stop campers to a degree, but surely giving someone's position away instantly just takes the tactics away from it.

I much prefer the Halo way of doing things, you have a theatre to watch the whole match from any position from any player and see where you went wrong after the match has finished.
bazzatuk on 7 Jan '10
Hard......... ok was i playin the rite game cse BFBC wasent hard at all.Same time werent easy.
Forge88 on 7 Jan '10
I don't think that's dumbing down unless you like the halo model where it takes almost a full mag to kill a single enemy for some reason. Targets should drop with a single shot but of course to make things gamey they rack up the amount of health enemies (and yourself) can take, but a full mag? Really? That's not hard but just annoying.
Sleepaphobic on 7 Jan '10
@Sleepaphobic
I've got over 500 hours of Bad Company online, and the only time it takes me a full mag to kill somebody is when I'm feeling tired, my aim is off, and most of my rounds are actually missing my target.
Try aiming for the head, you'll find in many cases that your target will drop quite quickly indeed.
KesMonkey on 7 Jan '10
i am an average player,and i thought BFBC was fine...i was however p**sed off last night when i played BF1943 and i shot a guy in the head twice and he didn't die

when is the demo out for everyone?
metallicorphan on 7 Jan '10
@Sleepaphobic
I've got over 500 hours of Bad Company online, and the only time it takes me a full mag to kill somebody is when I'm feeling tired, my aim is off, and most of my rounds are actually missing my target.
Try aiming for the head, you'll find in many cases that your target will drop quite quickly indeed.
no online was pretty sweet I was talking more abt the sp. It's cool if you take cover and but I was just running and gunning and had to pump guys with enough lead to kill elephants + the recoil and and barrel elevation was brutal. Sure there was no finesse in my tactics (if you can call it tht) but still it shouldnt take that many rounds to the body to drop an AI target.

Overall the game wasnt hard but I felt the pace was way off as you had to dedicate more time to a single target when I could have been on #2 or 3.
Sleepaphobic on 8 Jan '10
The killcam is one of the worst design decisions in a game. Yes is might stop campers to a degree, but surely giving someone's position away instantly just takes the tactics away from it.

I much prefer the Halo way of doing things, you have a theatre to watch the whole match from any position from any player and see where you went wrong after the match has finished.

I agree. I can kinda see the point to some extent in CoD, but in Battlefield sniping is a real skill, especially at a distance. To get one kill and then your location be given away is ridiculous.
altitude2k on 8 Jan '10
I played CoD1 online for 2 years solid and the killcam doesn't spoil it imo. Most decent players won't camp in the same spot anyway and it can be fun seeing how you died.

However I'm not sure you need it in a BF game. Why? Because the objective of the game is quite different to CoD. In CoD the objective even in SD is to take out the other players. In Battlefield that is secondary, capturing flags and supporting your team mates is the primary goal, and if you keep dieing all the time it's because your spawning at the wrong flag.

Choosing your spawn point in BF is very important, and it's for this reason I don't think a killcam is needed. People I've spoken to hated being sniped and not knowing where there their killers were. Well sorry but sniping in BF is pretty hard, I've played over 100 hrs as a sniper on BF2, and you stand very little chance in the open against standard troops so of course you are going to try and hide! If you keep getting sniped then change your spawn point, or get a vehicle!
funkyjack on 8 Jan '10
The only people who hate killcam are campers! The style of play in COD lends itself to the idea better than other games. I agree that in tactical games it wouldn't be good, but in free for all or team deathmatch on MW2 it's great to punish a static camper. Bunch of sissys!
jubbgi01 on 8 Jan '10
I don't mind campers at all. Not everyone has the reflexes for twitch combat, and if someone is dumb enough to repeatedly be killed by a guy standing in the same spot for an entire round end..well...doh!

Rushing about madly isn't imo a clever way to play either.
funkyjack on 8 Jan '10
I only had a loan of BFBC but I never thought it was that hard. I didn't spend that much time online and managed enough kills once I had learned the maps.

I liked that it wasn't a near-instant kill; it means you can hop in and out of cover and skirmishes last longer.
Dajmin on 8 Jan '10
I for one absolutely hate the fact that they make these games so easy these days.

Making it easier just so people find it easier to kill with a joypad is just going to destroy the PC "skilled" FPS gaming community. As it is the community is on it's last legs, and stupid moves like this one just hammer another nail in the coffin.

If you have to do it for business reasons, at least give the server admins an option to change the amount of player health or weapon damage attributes.

Shame on you, EA and DICE.
SuperWaz on 9 Jan '10
Read all 14 commentsPost a Comment
// Related Content
Previews:
News:
More Related
Battlefield: Bad Companyfrom £9.99
Toys R UsNo Information£9.99
The HutNo Information£14.73
ZavviNo Information£14.95
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (Limited Edition)from £37.99
GamePlayOut of Stock£37.99
Battlefield: Bad Company 2from £37.73
The HutNo Information£37.73
sendit.comNo Information£37.89
AsdaNo Information£37.91
// The Best ofCVG
Click here to subscribe to PC Gamer magazine.
Click here to subscribe to PC Zone magazine.
News | Reviews | Previews | Features | Interviews | Cheats | Hardware | Forums | Competitions | Blogs
Top Games: Pro Evolution Soccer | Pro Evolution Soccer 6 | Tomb Raider: Underworld | Metal Gear Solid 4 | Grand Theft Auto IV | Grand Theft Auto IV
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare | LittleBigPlanet | Burnout Paradise | Unreal Tournament III | Halo 3
Top Reviews: Darksiders | Bayonetta | James Cameron's Avatar: The Game | The Saboteur | Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks | Demon's Souls
Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles | Lego Indiana Jones 2 | Nintendo DSi XL | SAW | PES 2010
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited,
Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW
England and Wales company registration number 2008885