TopWare Interactive has released a new batch of media for its hack and slaher, Two Worlds II. The publisher has also fired a warning shot to anyone thinking of doctoring their screens...
"Just in time for the New Year, the development team at Reality Pump Studios have released several new Two Worlds II screen shots," says Topware's release.
"In addition to the screenshots from Hatmandor, the jungle, and swamp landscapes, TopWare Interactive also introduces MoveShots; 3 second videos revealing gameplay shorts.
"These, so-called, MoveShots serve as a very vivid forecast into the Antaloor universe featured in Two Worlds II as well as dispelling any rumors about the possibility of doctored screen shots, which, unfortunately, are all too common throughout the modern day videogame industry."
See the 'so-called' MoveShots(TM) here and be sure to come back and tell us what you think of them.
Having found all 3 decent is making me feel a little uncomfortable on this thread If it really was that bad, then plus side has to be that it can only get better
The ones on CVG are just regular shots, you need to follow the link for the short clips.
I only ever tried the demo for the original Two Worlds and was appalled at the horrendous frame rate. It was almost unplayable. In fact, it was unplayable. I deleted it after about 30 seconds and wrote it off. Then the reviews filled in the blanks for me.
The screens look good, they just need to make the game actually live up to them.
the worst game ever is diablo and even that got a sequal
What? Are you mental? Diablo and especially D2 are some of the most highly rated and respected games of the last 15 years. It's pretty much responsible for creating the top-down point-and-click action-RPG genre!
The worst game ever, without a single doubt in my mind, is ET on the Atari 2600. Anyone who suggests it has a single redeemable feature needs their face pushed into a furnace.
Well, the screenshots look very nice, IMO, and the 3 second movement clips look fine too. My two main concerns are:
1) The prequel was deemed to be dire judging by the overall reception of the game. That being the case it remains uncertain whether the developer will manage to improve its efforts on this sequel.
2) On the game's website there is a longer cinematic video. It may be true in-game graphics being demonstrated as opposed to CGI rendering however, my concern with that video is that the combat movement appears sluggish, as if in a dream (see the end combat scene).
I didn't play "Two Worlds I" yet I'm curios enough about "Two Worlds II" to wait for the reviews to come in.
i've looked at all the pictures on the site, the game's site not this one, on three different browsers and none of them moved. are they like those magic eye pictures or something because i couldn't see anything in those either? has anybody actually seen them move?
You have to click on thr right arrow to go to video screens, the default page is just screen shots.
so they are in fact just short videos and this "moveshots" business is just more marketing? still if ever there's a game that needs some serious marketing if it's gonna sell it's this one.
You have to click on thr right arrow to go to video screens, the default page is just screen shots.
so they are in fact just short videos and this "moveshots" business is just more marketing? still if ever there's a game that needs some serious marketing if it's gonna sell it's this one.
Of course they're videos, but it's still a decent idea. Screenshots often don't show what the game is like in motion, and trailers are usually scripted action.
Two Worlds was quite entertaining, for all the wrong reasons.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited, Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW England and Wales company registration number 2008885
If it really was that bad, then plus side has to be that it can only get better 
