Share this article:
 Digg.com Facebook Google Bookmarks N4G Gamerblips del.icio.us Reddit Slashdot.org StumbleUpon Told everyone it was gonna be crap. :roll: I never liked the original or the sequel so didn't have a lot of interest in this. Looks like that was justified. I had a feeling this wasn't going to be very good. That as it may be, I look forward to getting my hands on this title and putting it through its paces on my own. I've read other reviews expressing similar responses, however it seems that there are some Wolfenstein fans whom are quite happy with how it turned out. Perhaps I too shall be one of those. Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory is where it's at and it's free.
http://enemy-territory.4players.de/news.php
Still worth playing to this day. Multiplayer games at it's finest. Excellent stuff. I think this is another case of critics missing the point.
Wolfenstein is not a revoluntionary shooter. It was never going to be, really; whilst Return to Castle Wolfenstein was a solid shooter, it was never anything groundbreaking. This new title isn't either, but it offers a really solid slice of shooty action with some really great visuals at times and some novel ideas. But whilst the story is banal, the supernatural aspects underwhelming and the innovation lacking, Wolfenstein has one major ace up its sleeve... its bloody good fun. wtf 5/10 thats bullsh!t the single player is fuking wicked if u play this game just play it without thinking cod or kz2 or other fps this game is just a fun shooter its 7/10 easy i give it 8/10 just because its so fun to shoot nazis all day long it never gets old if u only play online dont buy it but if ur down with single player then give it a go WTF?????
sorry CVG but you just lost all credibility.
"feels like a old game"
ok now thats officially the most pathetic thing i have ever heard congratz.
obviously yous have never heard of wolfenstein, ITS A CLASSIC GAME, ITS THE DADDY OF FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS, ITS THE GRANDFATHER TO THE GREAT DOOM! OF CORSE ITS GOING TO FEEL OLD IT HAS ALLOT OF HISTORY BEHIND IT.
god how can some one be so dumb?
guys dont believe this BS review.
its a bloody great game, some of the areas are allot of fun to explore, the missions are constantly mixed up and changed.
your constantly fighting new enemies saying shit how am i going to beat this bitch.
the weapons are really cool, the flamethrower actually burns the enemies and they look like there burned ive never seen a game have that effect, all games normally just have the guy laying there like nothing hapend.
the hit detection in the game is very good, shoot someone in the leg and they drop to the ground, very few games do that.
there are a few bugs in the game, which can get annoying.
the graphics are a massive letdown.
its not as good as return to castle wolfenstein or wolfenstein 3D.
BUT there classics this games NOT! a bad game and deserves NO LESS! than a 7 if your harsh and nit picky.
me id give it a 7.8
god and i thought games radar were full of shit, they gave it a 8.
congratz CVG youve raised the bar another lvl LMAO
:oops: That review is way too harsh. I picked this up yesterday (release day) and It's a great game, nothing special but nothing bad either. No game is perfect I think CVG needs to remember this the next time they review something. I get the sentiment, but this ISN'T a CVG review. X360 World are responsible for this, CVG merely printed it here (as part of their sister magazine deals). Its not cvgs review its ripped from a mag and i think its pretty spot the multiplayer is terrible set up by a bunch of pen pushing monkeys and the main game is rubbish. i'm glad i rented it first would have been peeved to have wasted money on it Harsh review I must say, whoever wrote it. I would give it around 7/10 myself. Sure there's nothing new about it, but then again what is these days. You can only polish something til it shines, and from what I've played of it so far it has managed that IMO. It feels like an old game because it does nothing new, it feels old which makes gameplay less exciting.
It doesn't matter what this game is called or it's history. If a game was called Shat-Man-Doo but was a 90% title I would buy it.
I like it how you said that "some" of the areas are a lot of fun to explore. :roll: :lol:
When you burn an enemy in Bioshock with Napalm from the Chemical Thrower the enemies burn and stay burned when dead.
If you shoot somebody in the leg in CoD 4 they fall down. Nothing new here. Moving on.
Like you said, there are bugs in the game. The graphics are shit and it's not as good as the previous Wolfenstein titles.
So, in conclusion, this game does nothing new, is not up to current standards design wise, or graphicaly and the gameplay feels old.
Er, so why exactly should this game be labed as "Good" and get a 7 or 8? The answer is: it shouldn't.
Rant over. | 
Brilliantly weighty weapons
