Share this article: Digg.comFacebookGoogle BookmarksN4GGamerblipsdel.icio.usRedditSlashdot.orgStumbleUpon Straight from Valve's mouths 'We're not PS3 developers'. Don't buy any PS3 game that originated from Valve. You're only encouraging them to put out crappy product.
Morne Valve - probably my favourite video game company, but them saying PS3 is too hard to develp for, when countless others have develped perfectly on it, seems rather lazy.
Good interview. I've got nothing but praise for Valve. And if they don't want to develop for PS3, fair enough. Plenty of games get to PS3 and not PC! The reason that the 360 gets included is that it's similar to the PC. If they were to work on PS3 then it would take the 150 people team much longer. I find it interesting they are able to keep source engine so valid. I thought that the shadows in Episode 2 were some of the best I have seen.
Besides, Valve realizes that if they keep the specs low enough then they will have a larger install base. This is why games like Crysis sell so few. Valve is very much a "By gamers, for gamers" developer. Possibly even the only developer who think like this. Everything they do is laboriously worked to perfection that would satisfy only the toughest of critics (the general public). And in all fairness, they are a PC dev. That's how they started out and they know that trying to move into the console market will water down the experience. Its not lazy its simply that PS3 uses a totally different language. XBOX is so similar to a PC its simpler to port... Just please hurry (but don't rush it :? )up with episode 3. I was late to get the orange box (last month) but completed it all and I need my Freeman fix!
Also, I agree with previous comments - I love Valve He just doesn't like the PS3 because it is beyond his ability to program for it. If he spent more time learning the code instead of eating hamburgers then maybe they could do it. Sorry, but this guy just gets under my skin. I know that the Valve people are talented so I hope that the PS3 is not left in the dust by them. Valve love +1.
And again for their policy on games design and system spec. It goes to show though, doesn't it? Valve sell really well, Crytek bitch and complain they will not develop any more titles soley for PC.
I honestly think Half Life 2 Ep2 is one of the most perfect FPSs I've ever played. Good to hear Valve are finally going to use their phenominal skills to bring us more than constant iterations of HL. Yeah they do the best linear scripted FPS games about but for such a talented bunch it's about time they branched out. I think they've already realised that themselves. Freeman has done alot for VALVe but he can't do everything.
Off Topic: I hope they do for CS2 what they did for TF2 but the opposite - unrealistic cartoon shooter, ultra realistic tactical shooter - and branch out into tactical FPS gaming that Ubisoft has now abandoned. Throw in a old school mode for all those people still in love with the original gameplay so as not to alienate them.
RE PS3: People knew what they were getting into when they bought their PS3s, for them to come out now and complain is just wrong, naive and ignorant. i bought Orange Box for the 360, and felt an overwhelming "meh" for Half-Life. not that it was bad, but i think its a bit overrated (Bioshock is much, much better by comparison). but Portal was another story entirely. i can easily see Portal 2 as a stand alone game if given more lengthy content, and it would be one that i would easily purchase.
as far as their "We're not PS3 developers" comment; to each his own. i have a both systems, so as long as they develop (Portal 2) for one then i'm not complaining. it does sadden me that they shun the PS3's technology as being too complicated though. thats a lot of untapped potential Valve is wasting by flushing down the toilet like that. -- *FANBOY RADAR DETECTS FANBOY* - *TYPE*: PS3. - *EMOTION*: JEALOSY. BITTERNESS. - *SUGGESTED ACTION*: AVOID.
I would love Valve to do something on Wii, they are so innovative I'd love to see what they'd make of the wiimote. Never had the pleasure of playing Portal or Half Life 2 but would love to some day. investing more in the gameplay, AI and design then in graphics and rendering.
Thats what l like to here :lol: I'd like to see Valve pursue a more open-ended FPS game - although Portal was a fun little blast, I'd still like to see them open their minds to something other than linear shooters.
All of the 'great moments' in HL2 were scripted, whereas all the great moments in Stalker were created by myself and the random events in the game world. When I now look at HL2/ep1/ep2 and Stalker, there is no doubt in my mind that Stalker is the superior gaming experience.
I feel they need to do more than take these 'baby steps'; they need to start taking leaps. There's only so much worth I can place in a linear shooter, no matter how polished it is. i didnt see him say it was too hard, he said they dont have the man power. its amazing how many people on these forums think devs can support all platforms at once on multiple games. anyway, i bet they make plenty of cash from the 360 and PC, do they need the ps3 right now? A valve developed mmo... hmm that would be great :D I hope they continue down that route and actually pull it off. I do find it sad though that they neglect the PS3, even if it is a different programming language, it is pretty lazy of them to not even concider trying, and instead being pushed by EA of all people. Seeing as they've now done the orange box for the PS3, I'm tempted to ask what exactly is stopping them from porting Left 4 Dead over as well? I realise that it's a new franchise, but surely chosing not to bother developing for the PS3, even after they've now got the resources to do so, is throwing a lot of potential money out the window. I for one would relish the opportunity to play L4D on my PS3, but obviously PC comes first for me ^_-. You would think that a Video Game development company would want to stay ahead of the curve. Not Valve & Gabe Newell. They are paiving a new road for themselves. The only problem is, their road leads to nowhere, then into a brick wall.
It's horrible to see a developer taking the lazy, easy way out, especially when we can see the results when a development company makes the effort to follow technology as it advances and evolves.
Basically what Valve is telling us is, they refuse to advance themselves along with the technology of today. This can only result in a half-ass product for the consumer. I won't stand for it. I will not be purchasing any products made by or developed by Valve. Their philosophies are way out of date. You would think that a Video Game development company would want to stay ahead of the curve. Not Valve & Gabe Newell. They are paiving a new road for themselves. The only problem is, their road leads to nowhere, then into a brick wall.
It's horrible to see a developer taking the lazy, easy way out, especially when we can see the results when a development company makes the effort to follow technology as it advances and evolves.
Basically what Valve is telling us is, they refuse to advance themselves along with the technology of today. This can only result in a half-ass product for the consumer. I won't stand for it. I will not be purchasing any products made by or developed by Valve. Their philosophies are way out of date. You would think that a Video Game development company would want to stay ahead of the curve. Not Valve & Gabe Newell. They are paiving a new road for themselves. The only problem is, their road leads to nowhere, then into a brick wall.
It's horrible to see a developer taking the lazy, easy way out, especially when we can see the results when a development company makes the effort to follow technology as it advances and evolves.
Basically what Valve is telling us is, they refuse to advance themselves along with the technology of today. This can only result in a half-ass product for the consumer. I won't stand for it. I will not be purchasing any products made by or developed by Valve. Their philosophies are way out of date. well, Mr. superdynamite.
You can suck my balls. Without wanting to get all Fanboy-esque here.
Only an owner soley of one console that isnt getting developed by Valve would have an issue with them.
Is that you? I don't really care if they never developed another console game ever, personally they started developing games on the PC, pushed it back then, and they seem to be good at PC games, they should stay there.
I haven't really been impressed with the Orange Box, it felt too short for any kind of real enjoyment (I've only ever played the games once). Hopefully Ep3 will be good, but I'm getting worried that they are beginning to love themselves too much and at the moment it seems that any kind of game will do.
Hopefully they won't disappoint next time. *avoids Fanboy-ism*
Well this article sucked! didn't actually tells us anything on Portal 2, Ep3 or L4D really, he just regurgitated some of the crappy press release material that we have all heard before. i dont really get where people pull these kinda statments from...how in the hell can the orange box be too "short", its five games in one. Portal took about 2.5 hours, Ep 1 & 2 were maybe 6 hours gameplay in total, HL2 everyone had already played anyway, TF2 wasn't great IMO.
So yeah, I understand his statement. A few linear games that I'll probably never play again. This is an old interview given a new coat of paint and posted again! He actually said Valve weren't big enough to develop for the PC and the PS3. They only employ 150 people and resources are limited. That's all he said! As the Xbox360 is a basic PC, games will be ported over to that. He didn't say anything negative about any console. I would expect his position will change as it becomes more difficult to port games from a PC to the 360 (the xbox360 uses 5 year old PC components after all) and the PS3 market share starts become more significant. I can't understand for the life of me why he wants to develop for the Wii though. The orginal half life wouldn't even run well on it! Like I said in the old post I don't really care what he thinks, I just want good games from Valve. This is an old interview given a new coat of paint and posted again! He actually said Valve weren't big enough to develop for the PC and the PS3. They only employ 150 people and resources are limited. That's all he said! As the Xbox360 is a basic PC, games will be ported over to that. He didn't say anything negative about any console. I would expect his position will change as it becomes more difficult to port games from a PC to the 360 (the xbox360 uses 5 year old PC components after all) and the PS3 market share starts become more significant. I can't understand for the life of me why he wants to develop for the Wii though. The orginal half life wouldn't even run well on it! Like I said in the old post I don't really care what he thinks, I just want good games from Valve. This is an old interview given a new coat of paint and posted again! He actually said Valve weren't big enough to develop for the PC and the PS3. They only employ 150 people and resources are limited. That's all he said! As the Xbox360 is a basic PC, games will be ported over to that. He didn't say anything negative about any console. I would expect his position will change as it becomes more difficult to port games from a PC to the 360 (the xbox360 uses 5 year old PC components after all) and the PS3 market share starts become more significant. I can't understand for the life of me why he wants to develop for the Wii though. The orginal half life wouldn't even run well on it! Like I said in the old post I don't really care what he thinks, I just want good games from Valve. This is an old interview given a new coat of paint and posted again! He actually said Valve weren't big enough to develop for the PC and the PS3. They only employ 150 people and resources are limited. That's all he said! As the Xbox360 is a basic PC, games will be ported over to that. He didn't say anything negative about any console. I would expect his position will change as it becomes more difficult to port games from a PC to the 360 (the xbox360 uses 5 year old PC components after all) and the PS3 market share starts become more significant. I can't understand for the life of me why he wants to develop for the Wii though. The orginal half life wouldn't even run well on it! Like I said in the old post I don't really care what he thinks, I just want good games from Valve. don't ask me why I posted that so many times! I don't know... anything to get my Kudos increased! Valve say they dont have the resources to develop for ps3 (which i assume means they did not want to release a poor product) is all well and good but for Valve to then let EA take The Orange Box and absolutely trash it for the ps3 is nothing short of scandalous,and all this from a company that supposedly loves its franchises and cares about gamers,stinks of greed and contempt i think. What other publisher can release a compilation of games (Orange Box) and get it reviewed everywhere, and then release the titles individually and get them reviewed all over again - with review scores and everything!?
The gaming media is obviously a huge fan of certain publishers and is biased toward them. Valve is one of these 'favoured' companies.
As big a fan as I am for Half Life 2, I still think the media should have been more circumspect of 5 hour £15 'expansions' (as in Ep1 and Ep2) and do wonder if it's a good thing to have such a juvenile media in this regard, instead of a fair, unbiased media that treats all companies similarly. For me, Valve can do almost no wrong
HL2 and the episodes are the pinicle of storey driven FPS, and with the graphicle upgrades shown on Epi 2, Source is showing no real sign of aging can't you read? they are saying that they DON'T have enough staff to make multiple versions of games. they are like most developers trying to make a living. and lets face it, game sales on the pS3 aren't that great. the Xbox 360 sells more software in the USA than the PS3 and PS2 together.
look at Free Radical? they turned away from the 360 with Haze, their reason was because they want to give gamers a reason to buy a PS3? now thats stupid! but its their own choice. I for one won't be buying HAze, I downloaded the demo and the game isn't anywhere near what I expected. right now for these types of games, the 360 is the daddy! and always will be. So if they made the best game ever you would buy it as you dont like their ideas?, that seems kinda retarded and lame, get a friggin life 'That may work within the industry, and it may impress some people at trade shows, but I think when you get that out to Joe-Average, who has a two-year old PC and doesn't have £2000 to buy the latest hardware to run a game, it's not so good. We don't want that disconnection.'
1) Can we get all publishers thinking this way?
2) Can we do something about everybody, magazines reviewers and PC gamers alike that said STALKER graphics were 'like Half Life' and at the same time called them 'dated'!! Comments like this that state that anything less than Crysis graphics is somehow dated are the reason we keep getting PC games hardly any PC owner can play, thereby causing lower sales and by extension hurting the PC gaming format! |