Login to access exclusive gaming content, win competition prizes
and post on our forums. Don't have an account? Create one now!
Why should you join?
Click here for full benefits!
Follow our Twitter feed@RareLtd We must have the same supplier: http://bit.ly/tgAdx
SIGN IN/JOIN UP
GamesForumsCheatsVideo
ID theft moves to console, PC games | Behind the Sims: Pixie Lott video | Wolfenstein: TWO new trailers | ArmA 2 launches with mini-site | 46 Brütal Legend screenshots | New StarCraft II footage | Splinter Cell won't come to PS3, says Ubi | EA 'focusing on online business' | Stare at Modern Wafare 2 again | Empire: Total War update incoming | StarCraft II "aiming" for 2009 | Take-Two eyes 5m BioShock 2 sales | Codies' Ashes Cricket 2009 screenshots | Fans push PRO-Left 4 Dead 2 group | Infinity Ward: Multiplayer "will always be free" | Elder Scrolls games on Steam | Cities XL Beta Giveaway | Diablo III: New screenshots | Necessary Force is Midway Newcastle game | Modern Warfare 2 to get online subscriptions? | New UK game ratings symbols unveiled | DC Universe - Flash unveiled | Huge FIFA 10 developer diary | Midway Newcastle "too good" to close | BBFC responds to being dropped
All|PC|PlayStation|Xbox|Nintendo|Download PC Games
Search CVG
Computer And Video Games - The latest gaming news, reviews, previews & movies
CVG Home » PC » News
PreviousTake-Two eyes 5m BioShock 2 sales Empire: Total War update incoming  Next

StarCraft II "aiming" for 2009

Blizzard re-affirms launch hopes
Blizzard has re-affirmed that it's "aiming" to launch Korean-enslaving RTS, StarCraft II in 2009.

Speaking in an interview with Press2Play.tv, StarCraft II lead designer Christ Sigaty re-confirmed that the developer's "aiming" for this year with the sequl, which is set to go into beta this summer.

StarCraft II Cinematic TrailerCinematic footage
4:28  First ever cinematic trailer for Blizzard's RTS sequel
Click to playClick to play in HD
Now playingMore videosShare this 
Watch tons of other game videos in HD over on our video channel!

The developer originally revealed its hopes to release the sequel at E3 earlier this month. This confirms it.

Look for more StarCraft II goodness on CVG very soon.

computerandvideogames.com
// Interactive
Share this article:  
Digg.comFacebookGoogle BookmarksN4GGamerblips
del.icio.usRedditSlashdot.orgStumbleUpon
 
Posted by ginsin
Then hopefully Diablo III in 2010.
Posted by humorguy
By the time you have bought all three campaigns, Starcraft 2 is going to cost twice as much as Starcraft and Brood War combined! Well, excuse me, but even though I think Starcraft 2 will be good, there's no way it will be TWICE as good as the original, because the original was bloody fantastic!!!

This is Blizzard saying 'we know there are very few PC games coming out now, so let's make money from the desperate PC gamers who are gagging for a decent game.

This is opportunism I feel, like Black Marketeers in WWII. Blizzard should have been put under the spotlight a lot more by the media and gamers about their decision to sell each campaign separately and for full price!
Posted by Sir_Squiggles
I don't really see it that way. Practically all RTS games are expanded upon down the line. The first release will have the entire multiplayer component and a single player campaign, as one would expect. The only difference will be how the single player content will be divided between expansions.

It's not like we're getting the equivalent of a third of the single player levels from the first game, we're getting a lengthy campaign from the human point of view that took Blizzard all of this ridiculously long development time to create. And then the other races will be explored in depth, instead of splitting up the story between the games.

The way I see it (or at least I hope) we are getting three times the Starcraft, not regular amount of Starcraft for three times the price. Just as the release of Brood War was a good thing if you liked the original.
Posted by humorguy
Well, from everything I read and heard all we're getting is about the same by the time you buy all three plus multiplayer. And if Starcraft was a full game, then I can't see each campaign, whatever Blizzard do with them, matching individually what Starcraft brought to the table.

I still say that my surmising and your surmising just shows how Blizzard have not been under the spotlight at all for this decision and just because they are Blizzard I suppose, no one is getting out of them why they think this is right!

And you talking about 'all this time' is ridiculous.it's not as if they have gone 'open world' and '3D'. From all the videos and screenshots I have seen it's the same 3/4 view and just a bit prettier graphics. and no one is going to convince me the gameplay or AI can be better than the first Starcraft, so where does that leave us?
Posted by Sir_Squiggles
Well, I've heard that Starcraft 2 will have the same amount of missions as Starcraft 1, so we aren't getting short changed at all, thus I have not felt the urge to vilify Blizzard. In any case, this is just speculation, all we have is Blizzard's word that it will be a full sized game.


You are suggesting perhaps that the expansion content is already existent at this stage and Blizzard are holding it back? That the title releasing this year could not possible have been in development for the six years Blizzard claim? It may be that I am too trusting.
Posted by The_KFD_Case
I'm inclined to agree with Humorguy on this one. Thus I do not anticipate I will be buying Starcraft II upon release. When/if I buy it, it will be when all three episodes have been released and can be bought in one pack. By that time it will be an older game probably with a disproportionally high price resulting in my attention and money being directed to other games. Maybe someday, years down the road, I'll buy a discount version of the three part compilation.

Diablo III I'm interested in; Starcraft II pt. 1 not so much.
Posted by humorguy
@KFD_Case, I think that's what a lot of us are going to do. I am not paying three times £40 or whatever to get what I got for £35 10 years ago. If Starcraft 2 had gone 3D and open world with a couple 100 sub missions and then 2 large DLC's at £20 each,. maybe. But not this.

And @Sir_Squiggles, I think the vast majority of PC gamers are far too trusting, so to be honest, you are in the majority group and I am in the minority one. And all I would want to say about that is if the PC gaming media and PC gamers had been a little more circumspect, PC gaming wouldn't be the mess it is in....
Posted by Sir_Squiggles
Uhuh. I think I'll leave you and your tinfoil hats to yourselves :)
Posted by humorguy
We'll leave you with your wooly one - oh sorry, that's your hair! :)
Posted by Sir_Squiggles
It gets all in my eyes sometimes :(
Posted by jazzy_p
Arnt people going to find the whole resource collecting part of this really annoying after the relic games?

That alone has put me off, along with the crazy business strategy..

Diablo 3 on the otherhand is a day one purchase..gimmie
Read all 11 commentsPost a Comment
// Popular Now
// Related Content
Previews:
Interviews:
News:
More Related
News | Reviews | Previews | Features | Interviews | Cheats | Hardware | Forums | Competitions | Blogs
Top Games: Unreal Tournament III | Football Manager 2007 | Medieval 2: Total War | Tiger Woods PGA Tour Online | Left 4 Dead 2 | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Guitar Hero 5 | BioShock 2 | Fallout: New Vegas | RUSE | Street Fighter IV
Top Reviews: ArmA 2 | The Sims 3 | Demigod | Empire: Total War | Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II | Burnout: Paradise
Mirror's Edge | LoTR Online: Mines of Moria | Grand Theft Auto IV | World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King | Left 4 Dead
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited,
Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW
England and Wales company registration number 2008885