Share this article:
 Digg.com Facebook Google Bookmarks N4G Gamerblips del.icio.us Reddit Slashdot.org StumbleUpon personally i hope its something else. The first was pretty was pretty dull.
Didn't Bioware just more a load of people into EA montreal??? Yes, but BioWare has it's own development department in EA Montreal if I understand correctly. A good premise for a game let down by poor and repetitive gameplay and pretty uninspring graphics.
As long as they try to improve upon its faults and dont just rush out a sequel then ill wait on this one to see how it goes without dismissing it straight away. good point. They are still owned by EA though. can't blame a guy for wishful thinking.
They've got to give an army of 2 sequel a subtitle. Army of two two Doesn't quite have the same ring to it. Unless it's the owrlds first dance/3rd person shooter game. Army of Two: II (AoT:II)? Or perhaps something a bit more colourful such as "Army of Two: Twins"? 8) Army of Desmond 2: Two I'm hoping more for both of the lead characters running around in ballet outfits.
Army of Tutu :) first one was garbage in the extreme. I know many people will disagree but I liked the firs Army of Two more than the game it was imitating, Gears of War. Army was still gratuitious and the characters largely unlikeable but it had that cool thing where you can air guitar and stuff with your friend. Army of THREE? Now with three-player co-op? There had better be an archbishop tucked away somewhere in the game then. Your comment had me laughing out loud. Thanks! :lol: :p Army of Two was a great game when played in CooP!! It was a shame nobody really played it online :( | 
