- SportsBleacher Report
2021 NFL Odds: Trey Lance, Justin Fields, Mac Jones Underdogs to Start Week 1
The San Francisco 49ers, Chicago Bears and New England Patriots all addressed long-term needs at the quarterback position by drafting Trey Lance, Justin Fields...
- U.S.Kansas City Star
Porn, alcohol were part of student sleepovers at lunch lady’s house, Louisiana cops say
It was a concerned parent who alerted police to the parties.
- CelebrityYahoo Life
Kristen Bell says she and husband Dax Shepard acknowledge attraction for other people: ‘We’re not dead’
The actress talks about not letting self-esteem get in the way of her relationship.
- U.S.In The Know
TikTokers are obsessed with a tiny Alaskan town where ‘everyone’ lives in the same building: ‘Do you ever go outside?’
About 85 percent of the town's 300 residents live in the same building.
- U.S.Yahoo News Singapore
Jailed: Woman who repeatedly injected son with insulin to give him 'peaceful death'
A woman who repeatedly injected her six-year-old son with insulin in a bid to give him a peaceful death was jailed five years on Wednesday (5 May).
- WorldThe Telegraph
The Queen comes to Meghan’s assistance in legal battle against Mail on Sunday
The Queen came to the Duchess of Sussex’s aid in her legal battle against the Mail on Sunday on Wednesday by dismissing claims that she owned the copyright to a letter Meghan wrote to her father. Her Majesty’s lawyers intervened in the High Court case as the two sides locked horns over one of the final bones of contention. The Duchess’s former communications secretary, Jason Knauf, also “emphatically” denied having any copyright claim to the letter, landing a final blow to the newspaper’s case. Their interventions on Wednesday paved the way for Lord Justice Warby to award a summary judgment on the outstanding copyright claim and with it, further costs. The Duchess successfully sued Associated for breach of privacy and copyright relating to the publication of five articles featuring extracts of the letter in February 2019. In February, she won a summary judgment, a legal step negating the need for witness evidence, in relation to the privacy claim and the bulk of the copyright claim. One of the final issues on which both sides disagreed was whether the Duchess was the sole owner of the copyright of the letter, having admitted that she sought guidance from others, including Mr Knauf and her husband, Prince Harry. Associated suggested that the Duchess sought professional advice because she knew the letter would be made public and that it was intended for use as part of a media strategy to enhance her image. As a co-author, Mr Knauf’s role at Kensington Palace might have rendered the letter Crown copyright. However, the court heard that Mr Knauf had confirmed in writing, via his solicitors, that despite making a “very minor suggestion” that Meghan include a reference to her father’s ill health, he did not co-write the letter. As such, he said he had no wish to become a party to ongoing legal proceedings.