Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What's WRONG with this sentence?

In addition, as Fincham (1999) indicates that consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

what's wrong with this sentence?

38 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    it should be

    In addition, Fincham (1999) indicates that the majority of research regards consultants as a group of people who are outside of the organizations.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    In addition, as Fincham (1999) indicates, consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

    OR

    In addition, Fincham (1999) indicates that consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

    However, I think that the sentence reads awkwardly with "regarded" in there. Usually, people regard things. In this case, you are saying that research regards something. Try using "proven by the majority of research."

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Try this

    In addition, as Fincham (1999) indicates, consultants are regarded as a group of people who are outside organisations, by the majority of research projects conducted in this area.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    It should not say "as Fincham..." it should just say Fincham. But I like your "in addition". Continue to use conjunctions where appropriate.

    try to cut down on the use of "that" and the verb "to get"

    Present tense is simple and sounds best.

    Unless you are American and can't grasp the language and have to make it simpler organizations > organisations.

    I think it should be...

    In addition, Fincham (1999) stated consultants are regarded by the majority of researchers as a group of individuals who are seperate from the internal organisational environment.

    How does that sound?

  • 1 decade ago

    It's an incomplete sentence; the idea doesn't fully come across. You could say, "In addition, Fincham (1999) indicates that consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside the organizations" (just take out the "as").

  • 1 decade ago

    it doens't make sense.

    I think it should read

    In addition, as Finchman (1999) indicates, consultants have been regarded by the majority of research, as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

  • Shibi
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Well, it's got some comma splice and other grammatical problems (I would also recommend getting rid of the "state of being verb" as it is in the passive voice and very bland here -- use "operate outside of the organizations" or something). Here is your sentence slightly modified:

    In addition as Fincham (1999) indicates, consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside of the organizations.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    In addition, as Fincham (1999) indicates, consultants have been regarded by the majority of research, as a group of people who are outside the organisations.

    In English, rather than American, and utilising one or two more comma's.

    Edit ; Paganmum is also correct (though spells with a "z"), and has a different meaning.

    I suppose it all depends on what you are trying to say.

  • 1 decade ago

    Change the puctuation and adjust as below and it will make more sense:

    In addition, as Fincham (1999) indicates, consultants have been regarded by the majority of research(ers?) as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

  • 1 decade ago

    I would write it as:

    Drop the "as"

    Additionally, Fincham (1999) indicates that consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

    or

    Drop "that"

    In addition, as Fincham (1999) indicates, consultants have been regarded by the majority of research as a group of people who are outside the organizations.

    Even when fixed, it sort of seems like an unnecessary statement, as consultants are commonly people from outside of the organization, brought in to be objective.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.