- Join CSI as an associate member to receive the newsletter
CSI
Special Features
Web Columns
Center for Inquiry
Resources
|
Home
: Skeptical Inquirer magazine
: May/June 1996 : Buy this back issue
What's That I Smell?
The Claims of Aromatherapy
Lynn McCutcheon
A small dose of aromatic oil may make for a pleasant experience,
but the claims of aromatherapy go way beyond that.
Aromatherapy typically involves putting a few drops of some
pleasant-smelling, plant-derived oil in your bath water, sniffing it
from an inhaler, or massaging it directly into your skin. I sampled a
number of these "essential oils," as they are called, and I was
impressed with their unique aromas. So what's the problem with
smelling something fragrant while you are bathing or while you are
getting massaged? According to John Meisenheimer, who practices
dermatology in Orlando, Florida, a tiny percentage of the population
is allergic to some essential oils. But for the rest of us, the answer
is, "nothing." A small dose of aromatic oil probably won't hurt you a
bit, and if you enjoy the smell, that's fine!
The problem lies with the claims made by aromatherapy's most widely
known practitioners -- claims that are causally confused, ambiguous,
dubious, and unsupported by scientific evidence. After reading several
books and articles written by the enthusiastic supporters of
aromatherapy, I believe that there are some recurrent themes that are
worth a closer look.
One such theme is what I call "confused causation." Virtually all
aromatherapists claim that if you relax for several minutes in warm
bath water to which has been added a few drops of essential oil, you
will get out of the tub feeling pleasant. I agree, but what causes the
pleasantness? Is it the warmth, the water, the minutes spent resting,
the few drops of oil, or some combination thereof? It would be easy to
conduct an experiment in order to find out, but for some strange
reason aromatherapists haven't seen fit to do this. Instead, they
imply that the essential oil is the main cause. Says Meisenheimer:
"The amount of essential oil from a few drops placed in your bath that
might actually penetrate the stratum corneum [skin] is probably too
small to have any meaningful, systemic, physiologic effect."
Other examples of confused causation permeate aromatherapists'
writings. Hoffmann (1987, p. 94) claims that chamomile is good for
insomnia if taken in a late bath. Is it the lateness or the chamomile
that makes you sleepy? For stress, Lavabre (1990, p. 108) recommends
relaxation, a better diet, nutritional supplements, more exercise, and
a few drops of an oil blend. Heinerman informs us (1988, p. 197) that
jasmine oil massaged into the abdomen and groin promotes sexual
stimulation. I'll bet it does, with or without the jasmine. On page
301 he suggests that to make unsafe water safe, boil it and add
rosemary, sage, or thyme before drinking. The heat probably kills most
of the germs. Edwards (1994, p. 135) mentions that many patients in
hospitals in England receive massages with essential oils. According
to her, "the relaxing and uplifting effect of the oils helps boost the
morale of the patients." Isn't it possible that the massage did as
much to boost morale as the oils did?
One of the favorite tactics employed by aromatherapists is the use of
ambiguous claims. Any good psychic can tell you that you never make a
specific prediction. You always leave yourself enough room so that
whatever the outcome, you can claim success. Judging from what I read,
the aromatherapists have mastered this strategy. Here are some of my
favorites, followed by my brief commentary.
According to Frawley (1992, p. 155), incense "cleanses the air of
negative energies." What are negative energies? The reader is
encouraged to get massaged with oil regularly (p. 155) because this
"keeps the nerves in balance." How would we know an unbalanced nerve
if we saw one? Hoffmann tells us (p. 95) that ylang ylang is
"supposedly an aphrodisiac." Is it or or isn't it? Lavabre declares
(p. 114) that benzoin resinoid will "drive out evil spirits." I'd love
to see that. Presumably spruce oil is an even better essence because
it is recommended (p. 64) "for any type of psychic work." Why limit
yourself to evil spirits? Edwards (p. 134) quotes Visant Lad as saying
that "life energy enters the body through breath taken through the
nose." Is life energy the same thing as oxygen, and if so, why can't
it enter through the mouth? About tea tree oil, Edwards opines
(p. 135), "There is hope [it] may play a role in the successful
treatment of AIDS." Is it hope or is it evidence? On the same page she
tells readers that aromatherapy is good for "restoring harmony and
balance between the mind and body." Such a phrase can mean almost
anything you wish.
Not all of the claims are hopelessly ambiguous or unlikely to be
true. I did a computer search of the psychological literature back to
1967, using the terms essential oils, aromatherapy, and the names of
23 common essences. I found that chamomile (Roberts and Williams 1992)
can put people in a better mood, and lavender sometimes causes
mistakes in arithmetic (Ludvigson and Rottman 1989). Furthermore,
several of the odors used by aromatherapists are capable of producing
physiological arousal as measured by electroencephalogram (EEG)
recordings (Klemm et al. 1992); and emotional changes, as measured by
self-report (Kikuchi et al. 1992; Nakano et al. 1992). Peppermint odor
appears to be capable of causing very small EEG, electromyogram (EMG),
and heart rate changes during sleep (Badia et al. 1990); and some
odors can modify artificially induced sleep time in mice (Tsuchiya et
al. 1991). There is evidence that specific odors can better enable one
to recall information that was learned in the presence of that odor
(Smith et al. 1992).
As a whole, these findings stretched to the limit would support only
small craft, sailing cautiously near the shores of the aromatic
sea. Unfortunately, some aromatherapists have been more than willing
to sail boldly into uncharted waters. Consider these claims about
specific essential oils, with my comments.
"A few drops of jasmine (Tisserand 1988, p. 87) cures postnatal
depression." I didn't find any olfactory research that mentions
postnatal depression. "Marjoram oil (Tisserand, p. 37) turns off
sexual desire." The few studies I found that mentioned marjoram had
nothing to do with sex. Price (1991, p. 93) tells us that juniper
berry is "relaxing" and "stimulating" (both?), and she (p. 48) and
Valnet (1982, p. 87) recommend lavender for insomnia. The Klemm study
showed that lavender was both arousing and unpleasant. Hoffmann
(p. 94) claims that patchouli is good for anxiety. My computer search
of the word patchouli turned up nothing. Valnet (p. 70) claims that
ylang ylang is good for one's sex drive. Ylang ylang didn't turn up
anything either.
Other claims of dubious validity are common to the writings of
aromatherapists -- broad claims that are related to the practice of
aromatherapy in general. The following claims are my words, but they
represent a synthesis of views expressed by the authors listed.
- Smell is the most direct route to the brain. (Avery 1992;
Edwards 1994; Green 1992; Raphael 1994). The implication is
that smell is superior to the other senses because olfactory
information gets to the brain quickest, and since aromatherapy
is concerned with smell, it is a superior method of
treatment. Olfactory information gets to the brain very
quickly, but so does auditory, tactile, and visual
information. The differences would certainly be measured in
milliseconds, and it would have no practical consequence. The
olfactory sense is directly linked to the limbic system -- a
portion of the brain concerned with emotionality and
memories. The aromatherapists make much of this -- the smell of
ginger evokes memories of grandma's cookies, etc. What they
don't tell you is that the sight of grandma's photo or hearing
her voice can do the same. All the senses are part of a massive
network that links all parts of the brain. Smell enjoys no
particular advantage when it comes to access to or speed of
access to various parts of the brain.
- Natural oils are better than synthetic ones. (Avery 1992;
Edwards 1994; Hillyer 1994; Lavabre 1990; Price 1991; Raphael
1994; Rose 1988). Most of these authors felt it unnecessary to
explain such a statement, but Lavabre told readers that
"natural" molecules work better because they have memory
(p. 49). It is possible to make a synthetic preparation
identical on a molecular level to the most important compound
in an essential oil. John Renner, who has heard many of the
bizarre claims made by aromatherapists, told me that if the
molecules are the same, "I doubt seriously that your body could
tell the difference." Given that essential oils contain several
compounds, it seems possible that a natural oil might have more
than one active agent. If that is so, then aromatherapists
should be spearheading the research effort to determine which
chemical compounds are inducing the changes they claim are
taking place. Instead, most of them seem all too willing to
assume that natural oils are better, and that there is no need
to defend this assertion with any rationale or research
evidence.
- Essential oils can help your memory. (Hoffmann 1987; Lavabre
1990; Price 1991; Valnet 1982). I found no evidence to support
this, and none of these authors provided a hint about how they
arrived at that conclusion. Psychologist Elizabeth Loftus, a
world-renowned human memory expert, told me in a personal
communication that she knows "of no cogent scientific evidence
that smells cure amnesia, or that they strengthen memory."
There is such a phenomenon as context-dependent learning. It
has been shown that it is easier to remember X when you can
return to the environment or context in which you learned
X. Presumably, the context provides cues that make it easier to
recall X. It has further been shown that at least one essential
oil can serve as a contextual cue (Smith et al. 1992). If this
is the basis for the above-mentioned claim, it is highly
misleading. The essence itself is not important, only the fact
that it was a significant part of the context in which the
original learning took place. In other words, if the essence
wasn't present when you learned X, then it won't help you
recall it later.
- Scientists are doing a lot of research on essential
oils. (Avery 1992; Price 1991; Rose 1988; Valnet
1982). Statements like this are usually followed by specific
claims. The implication is that these claims are supported by
scientific research. As we saw earlier, that isn't necessarily
true. Whether or not scientists really are doing a lot of
research on essential oils is debatable. By comparison with 50
years ago, there is probably more research on essential oils
today. By comparison with hearing and vision, research on the
consequences of smelling essential oils lags way behind. If
there really is a lot of research on the effects of essential
oils, why is it that these authors are so reluctant to cite it?
Their books and articles rarely list or mention any scientific
journal articles. Instead, if there are any references at all
they are to books written by other aromatherapists.
All of this sounds as though I am strongly opposed to the use of
essential oils. I'm not! If it pleases you to put some in your bath
water or have a little rubbed on your back once in a while, by all
means, go ahead. It is not the odor that arises from these fragrances
that is troubling, it is the stench arising from the unwarranted
claims made about them.
References
- Avery, A. 1992. Aromatherapy and You. Kailua, HI: Blue Heron Hill Press.
- Badia, p., et al. 1990. Responsiveness to olfactory stimuli presented in sleep. Physiology and Behavior 48: 87-90.
- Edwards, L. 1994. Aromatherapy and essential oils. Healthy and Natural Journal, October, pp. 134-137.
- Frawley, D. 1992. Herbs and the mind. In American Herbalism: Essays on Herbs and Herbalism, ed. by M. Tierra. Freedom, Calif.: Crossing Press.
- Green, M. 1992. Simpler scents: The combined use of herbs and essential oils. In American Herbalism: Essays on Herbs and Herbalism, ed. by M. Tierra. Freedom, Calif.: Crossing Press.
- Heinerman, J. 1988. Heinerman's Encyclopedia of Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs. West Nyack, N.Y.: Parker Publishing.
- Hillyer, P. 1994. "Making $cents with Aromatherapy." Whole Foods, February, pp. 26-35.
- Hoffmann, D. 1987. Aromatherapy. In The Herbal Handbook. Rochester, Vt.: Healing Arts Press.
- Kikuchi, A., et al. 1992. Effects of odors on cardiac response patterns and subjective states in a reaction time task. Psychologica Folia 51: 74-82.
- Klemm, W. R. et al. 1992. Topographical EEG maps of human response to odors. Chemical Senses 17: 347-361.
- Lavabre, M. 1990. Aromatherapy Workbook. Rochester, Vt.: Healing Arts Press.
- Ludvigson, H., and T. Rottman. 1989. Effects of ambient odors of lavender and cloves on cognition, memory, affect and mood. Chemical Sense 14: 525-536.
- Nakano, Y., et al. 1992. A study of fragrance impressions, evaluation and categorization. Psychologica Folia 51: 83-90.
- Price, S. 1991. Aromatherapy for Common Ailments. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Raphael, A. 1994. "Ahh! Aromatherapy." Delicious, December pp. 47-48.
- Roberts, A., and J. Williams. 1992. The effect of olfactory stimulation on fluency, vividness of imagery and associated mood: A preliminary study. British Journal of Medical Psychology 65: 197-199.
- Rose, J. 1988. Healing scents from herbs: Aromatherapy. In Herbal Handbook. Escondido, Calif.: Bernard Jensen Enterprises.
- Smith, D. G., et al. 1992. Verbal memory elicited by ambient odor. Perceptual and Motor Skills 74: 339-343.
- Tisserand, M. 1988. Aromatherapy for Women. Rochester, Vt.: Healing Arts Press.
- Tsuchiya, T., et al. 1991. Effects of olfactory stimulation on the sleep time induced by pentobarbital administration in mice. Brain Research Bulletin 26: 397-401.
- Valnet, J. 1982. The Practice of Aromatherapy. London: C. W. Daniel.
|
About the Author
Lynn McCutcheon taught psychology full-time for 23 years and
currently teaches as an adjunct at Florida Southern College. Home address: 240
Harbor Drive, Winter Garden, FL 34787.
Related Information
|