Home > Music > Your Feedback
Your Feedback
Comments? Concerns? Questions? We'd love to hear from you: Music@ChristianityToday.com
Regarding Sinead …
Editor's note: We're receiving a number of e-mails in response to our interview with Sinead O'Connor, who has, shall we say, some "unconventional theological understandings." Or, perhaps more accurately, misunderstandings …
posted 07/10/07
Sinead O'Connor doesn't have a clue about Christianity, and I am very disappointed you even spent time interviewing her for a Christian column. She sounds more New Age than anything. I am disgusted that you posted her comments. Shame on you!
Keri Pletka
posted 07/10/07
I don't think she has a clue about the God of Creation and his Son Jesus Christ. I believe she has created a god to suit her own opinion. That is called idolatry. I am not sure she has spent much time reading the Word. Not everyone is going to be saved. I struggle to see how anyone can read his Word and come up with her interpretation. Sounds like Sinead is full of excuses of why she chooses to be disobedient to God.
Jacqui Jo Fahrnow
posted 07/10/07
Has someone taken the time out to tell Sinead that Jesus is not made in her image and likeness? We are made in the image and likeness of the living God, not the other way around. The lack of reverence and synergistic familiarity some of these folks have about the things of God are going to land them in hell if they don't repent. And that would be a shame, because the Lord desires all to be saved. Somebody needs to tell them about the real Love of God, that as he saves us, he also chastises us out of that love.
Helen Thomas
posted 07/10/07
Any Christian who has any sensitivity to the teachings of Scripture will see immediately the mixed bag of O'Connor's "theology." She has a clear sense of how and why the Catholic priests and "hierarchy" erred morally in the sexual abuse scandals, and even of how they should have handled it. She understands God's love, but apparently not his wrath. She is a universalist who does not believe in the reality of sin and human depravity. To call Jesus an "energy" and equate him and the other members of the Trinity with Allah or Buddha is simply a rehash of the old, anti-Christian New Age movement. She does not see human beings as needing a Savior, nor does she see Jesus as that Savior. Yet God is still in the business of hitting home runs with crooked bats. And O'Connor's new album does draw heavily on Scripture, after all. We can hope and pray that some of the wisdom and truth of the OT will come through to most listeners. At the same time, we can only hope and pray that listeners will not be drawn to adopt her highly unscriptural "theology."
Rev. Tim Deibler
posted 07/10/07
What a waste of space. The interview was s---. Yes, that's right, I have no "qualms about swearing." Andree Farias seemed intent to be exclusive, wanting Sinead to claim to be a North American evangelical Christian so that she could be told she wasn't meeting God's standard. Instead of building bridges, encouraging her to continue to seek after Jesus, it became the same heavy-handed garbage that is standard in western Christianity. I thought Christianity Today was beyond that tripe, but I guess not. Please don't let this crap happen again.
Joel Martin
To Compare or Not Compare?
posted 06/18/07
In response to your recent newsletter, I believe that comparisons are a very valuable tool for all of us. It helps me when I'm looking for music and is a great way to introduce someone to Christian music. As for the comments that it isn't Christian to do so, I just don't see it. We must meet people where they are, which isn't the same thing as condoning [sinful] lifestyles. Paul considered his audience all the time (e.g. the unknown god speech on Mars Hill in Acts 17), and Jesus himself used very "secular" images in his parables to convey deeper spiritual truths.
Brian Rihner
posted 06/18/07
I must admit our family is totally clueless as to who any secular bands are. We listen to local Christian stations for all our music. So as far as secular bands go, comparisons have no value to us since we really don't know any. Comparisons to other Christian bands are more worthwhile.
Dave Hawkins
posted 06/18/07
As a relatively new Christian, it's hard for me to decide what music to listen to. I am glad for the comparisons since I know what sound I like and can find artists in Christian music with your help.
Kathleen Knox
posted 06/18/07
Comparisons are great for new Christians who want to enjoy Christian music, but aren't familiar with the sound of the varying CCM artists. For those who complain, they should be reminded that everything has a healthy medium. After all, you can be too spiritual, and thereby creating stumbling blocks for others.
Chris Beville
posted 06/18/07
I've got to admit, I cringe anytime I see the byline "sounds like" in a music review. A musicians' works should stand on its own merit. However, people are always asking me about bands I like, and their first question is usually, "What do they sound like?" For people who don't have much in the way of mainstream music exposure, the "sounds like" byline is definitely a useful tool.
Zach Lorton
posted 06/18/07
Comparing Christian artists to mainstream artists helps me a lot. I used to listen to mainstream music, and when I decided to listen to Christian music to "feed my faith," I was looking for stuff that sounded similar to the music I was comfortable with. Although I must say now that I listen to Christian music, I prefer comparing Christian artists to other Christian artists rather than comparing them to sinners.
Didi Brown
posted 06/18/07
It never ceases to amaze me what people will complain about (and attempt to quote scripture about). I think comparisons in music reviews are crucial to quickly and efficiently communicating the sounds of an artist's album to the reader.
Linda DuBois
posted 06/18/07
I think that the reviewers at Christian Music Today are doing what they are called to do. They are providing a point of reference to show similarities (or differences) between the artist they are reviewing and an artist that we may already be familiar with. And they are doing it from an objective, third-party point of view.
Lewis Chatman
Happy Returns for All Star United
posted 06/18/07
Great review! I've always loved All Star United, so I can't wait to pick that one up. I've always thought Ian Eskelin would be a good friend in that he would fully understand the depths of whatever you're going through, but would be able to make you laugh at the same time.
Michael Ehret
Sola fide …
posted 04/26/07
Thank you for your in-depth, intelligent review of Neal Morse's latest project, Sola Scriptura. The fact that you're now covering him as a Glimpse of God makes this album even more interesting to me. Unlike Christianity Today, I believe the Bible suggests Christ is God—I don't believe it insists upon it. Fortunately, each person's walk with God is personal and individual, so my apparently "un-evangelical" beliefs are nobody's business but mine and God's. I live for an audience of One, not an audience of pastors and others all too ready to pass judgment. Either way, thanks for continuing to pay attention to Neal Morse. It's so refreshing to find prog rock in Christian music!
Frank King
The Other Side on The Otherly Opus
posted 04/26/07
Thank you for the well-written review of Joy Electric's The Otherly Opus. I am blown away by Ronnie Martin's work on The Otherly Opus. What I find most impressive about the album is the interesting songwriting. The layering of melodies, the arrangements of the vocal tracks, the stark production, all combine for an experience that leaves me simply floored. My argument is not that Joy Electric deserves admiration for being distinct when compared to other Christian artists—it is that Joy Electric deserves commendation for being excellent. I have found very few Christian artists who pursue [artistic] excellence instead of appealing to a wider crowd. It's this aspect that allows me to share Ronnie's music with my college mates, who desire music that's more leftfield and original.
Jonathan Avants
Moved by Doerksen
posted 04/16/07
I've just read the interview with Brian Doerksen and it is so powerful and so real. I used to work at a Christian radio station in Adelaide, Australia, and we often featured Brian's music. It's been incredibly refreshing to read about his journey with all its challenges, and to be left thinking about the faithfulness of God. I hope to forward a copy of the interview to the worship leaders at my local church so that they too can be encouraged by Brian's honesty and insight.
Doug Oakley
Idol Chatter
posted 03/26/07
I had to chuckle over your commentary about American Idol because we were just talking at my weekly Bible study about sharing one's faith, and how difficult it is for people who are so immersed in the culture of their church that they end up "preaching to the choir." For a Christian to share their faith, they must go out among "them." The Idol-like Christian shows are fine. But I would hope that the producers and supporters of these types of shows aren't intimating that these are the only types of shows we should watch or participate in as Christians. For once again, that would only be preaching to the choir.
Karlynn Anderson
posted 03/26/07
The idea of [American Idol] being able to glorify God made me laugh at the irony—something that so unashamedly proclaims "idol" in its name. While I believe an individual who participates in such an event could conceivably bring God glory in their act, the show as a whole will not. It is not centered on music as much as image. The show is rigged so only a certain kind of personality can even make it to the final round. Yes, you need a good voice, but if you don't have the certain "look," I guarantee you won't make it, regardless of how well you sing. For this reason, I don't believe the show will ever bring God glory. A few of the contestants may, but that will be as far as it goes. The subject of glorifying God is largely placed at the individual level. Each person has their own role to play and has to make their own decisions. We can never expect a secular show to do the job for us—it is our responsibility after all.
John Moser
posted 03/26/07
I do not believe we need an alternative to American Idol. Whether or not the show is Christian or not, if someone wants to idolize a singer, they will. Isn't Gifted just an exclusive [version of] Idol? It is still a singing competition, just like Idol—assuming of course that Gifted contestants aren't being judged by their level of Christianity.
Jess Yu
posted 03/26/07
It's sad that this Gifted/Idol dichotomy still exists in the Christian culture. The evangelical church still doesn't seem to get that we are called to be salt and light, and not "hidden under a bushel." The arts are one of the best ways to help people see their own humanity and need for grace. Christians should aim to bring a new level of quality to Idol, whether the lyrics express their faith explicitly or not. Being made in the image of God, any human is attesting to the glory of God by using their vocal gifts.
Jeff Yourison
posted 03/26/07
I'm strictly against Christians using their talents that God has given to them for a competition. If a certain Christian group wants to raise funds for a particular venture, they can come together and have a concert asking for donations to assist with [whatever the cause]. I don't think that God has given our talents to us for us to compete—it is like fighting. God has given us our talents to glorify his name … and to save souls. No one will get the message in a competition.
Elma Chapman
posted 03/26/07
It seems as though the majority of Christians today want to only socialize with other Christians, only listen to Christian music, and only watch programs that are Christian oriented. I believe it was Christ that said, "It is not the healthy who need the doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners (Mark 2:16-17)." With that scripture at the forefront of our life service, it seems only befitting for us to be in the world and not to hibernate in our [Christian culture].
Scott Adlon
posted 03/26/07
As far as Idol is concerned, I think the creation of a Christian based alternative was a knee jerk reaction—like, "Oops, we should've thought of this idea in the first place!" All too often, it seems the church reacts instead of pro-acts. While, I'm sure the people in the Gifted competition were [openly] thankful, it never gained the attention Idol has and never will. Idol is bringing in all walks of life … and it's so important that these Christian and non-Christian contestants meet and interact. There's a greater chance of the Great Commission being fulfilled. We need not be a closet performer anymore!
Karen Allenn-Chitwood
posted 03/26/07
I used to be a huge fan of American Idol, and felt great excitement when contestants would thank God or mention prayer as of way of dealing with the stress. However, the advertisements during Idol have become [increasingly counterproductive] to the "purity" that Idol is trying to provide. For example, every single episode has had an ad for Victoria's Secret. With both a teen son and preteen daughter watching, I have to scramble for the remote to turn the channel. As a Christian family, we do not watch Idol as often, and if we do, we have to sit with the remote in hand. It is disappointing that a show that has the potential to do good puts all morals aside for [advertising] money.
Rosi Crawford
posted 03/26/07
I've always wanted to become a [professional] singer, and I too tried out for American Idol, because my friends wanted me to. Walking with the Lord and having a goal to seek his will, we all know we should use our talents and skills to glorify his name. My dream is to sing and evangelize, but I guess we should always pray to him to use our talents because only he can decide.
Alesia Cruz
posted 03/26/07
I am a Christian vocal coach with my own studio. My students range from gifted 9-year-old to college-age and beyond. I have used Idol a lot in teaching my students about glorifying God with their voices and the music they choose to sing, whether that be an Italian aria or a Contemporary Christian pop song in a worship setting. I have a strong desire to see Christian artists move into the world, not to become like them, but to help impact God's plan for all creation by setting Christ-like examples through their music. People can still sing for the Lord while "performing" a piece. We need God's people to be integrated in programs like Idol.
Susie Amerise
posted 03/26/07
I think that what you may want to look at is how many of the participants in Idol have gone on to record Christian songs since appearing on the show. Many of them have taken their experience as an opportunity to record songs for the Lord and take the message of hope to others. I think it shows that once you show a child the way to love God, even when he is old he will keep God's way.
Eduardo De Jesus
posted 03/26/07
American Idol can definitely serve as a vessel for Christians to share Jesus. God created them with beautiful voices, energy, the ability to stand up to [scrutiny], and the Lord knows what else! May they all stop cowering behind the makeup mirrors, tattoo parlors, fashion studios, pharmacy counters, jewelry bins, and start doing what the Lord Jesus created them to do.
Elizabeth Good
Some Words from Christian Radio
posted 01/22/07
Your article concerning Christian radio makes some assumptions I feel are unfounded. I have been involved in Christian music radio since 1976. You assume that all "Christian" radio stations are the same, that we all are called to evangelize and represent the diversity of Christianity. We are not. All individual Christians are called to the Great Commission, but not all business enterprises. Some of our stations are committed to providing information and entertainment to those who feel comfortable with the Christian lifestyle, but are not involved in the evangelical efforts of the church. Perhaps a good question to ask is, "Why are these radio stations approaching their business in this fashion?" Perhaps the answer is these Christian radio stations are experiencing success in ways the industry has never enjoyed. Success in this sense means more people are listening to Christian radio than at any time in measurable history.
Gary Walsh
Editor's note: Neither the article itself nor its author is making any such "assumptions" about Christian radio. Shaun Groves, a Christian artist, was quoted as saying that many Christian radio stations think of themselves as "evangelistic" when they're really just serving a Christian audience.
posted 01/22/07
As one who works in Christian radio, I find Geil's series to be a revealing glimpse inside the workings of Christian radio today. It's not exhaustive, and I wish there were more responses from radio programmers and managers. But it does highlight the landscape and dynamics that dictate much of Christian radio's structure and operations. Sometimes exploring the inner workings of a familiar medium raises more questions than it answers. That's good. Any constructive dialogue between radio and listeners will help us strengthen what we do.
Cecil Van Houten
Complaints from "Becky"
posted 01/22/07
As a 41-year-old woman, I'm disturbed that "they" think AC radio is the music I want to hear most. The 35-44-year-old group today grew up on rock 'n' roll. I like soft rock, but I like heavy metal too. What I want from my CCM is talent and great meaningful lyrics. I don't want pop/churchy music. I despise the drivel I hear on my local radio station. I know there are groups playing what I want, but now that I'm not at a Christian college, I have problems finding them. My tastes didn't change when I turned 30.
Leila Pitchford-English
posted 01/22/07
I am a 40-something mom who is very concerned that there's nothing out there on the radio for kids to listen to. Christian radio indeed targets the "soccer moms and dads"— even though I personally prefer Project 86, Disciple, or Underoath to Point of Grace. Our youth need to listen to the kind of music they want to hear with lyrics that aren't profane, immoral, or violent. We have so many excellent Christian artists who never get airtime because Christian radio is not playing their kind of music. Even if Christian radio would dedicate certain times of the day to music that our youth would enjoy (e.g. before and after school, weekends) it would be helpful. I truly feel like there's a huge ministry opportunity we're missing because we don't offer kids the Christian alternatives (available right now) to the secular music that they are listening to.
Christine A. Hill
posted 01/22/07
It sure explains why I like Christian radio when I was in the "Becky" age group and raising my kids. But now it seems bouncy, irrelevant, and plain annoying. I'd love to hear some of the alternative music my kids listen to, but some of the fringe stuff I can only check out by borrowing from our students!
Rosemarie Kowalski
Just a Phase for Lennon
posted 01/22/07
I read the excerpt from The Gospel According to the Beatles. What's next? The Gospel According to Ozzy? The New Testament according to Marilyn Manson? John Lennon's "Christian phase" means nothing to me and it shouldn't mean a hill of beans to any other of your readers. Unless, of course, Christianity Today is trying to be "of the world" and drop names to get more readership. It makes me upset sometimes for Christian entities (magazines, TV stations, websites, etc.) to pull the world into what they are putting out there.
Jeffery Guill
Editor's note: Mr. Guill is apparently in the minority. The book excerpt about John Lennon's "born-again phase" has been of huge interest to readers, rating as one of the most highly-read Christianity Today articles in months. The article doesn't "legitimize" Lennon's phase, but merely reports what the former Beatle apparently experienced. As for the Gospel According to Ozzy, if he came to Christ, or even just had a "Christian phase," you bet we'd report it.
Thank God for the Glimpses
posted 01/22/07
Thank you for your Glimpses of God section. For a while now, I've been getting sick of the same Christian music. Lately some of the sounds have been similar to the taste of saccharine—sweet at first, then eww. Because of your Glimpses, I have been able to find much more of a connection with the Lord through music [outside the box]. The best example was your article on India.Arie. I purchased her album the same day I read it—three months later, I'm still grooving to her music. Another was Scott Stapp. [Editor's note: Stapp's review wasn't a "Glimpse," but close enough!] Unfortunately, we all stumble and fall, but two of his songs on his solo album really picked me up during a "desert" season. Thank you so much! Please continue letting God use this for his glory!
B. Warren
Helping the Little Guy
posted 01/15/07
Thank you very much for including us, Runway 36, in your Indie Artist Spotlight. We can tell you really listened and got into the music. We have since received many comments from new fans that found us because of your site. Thanks again for helping us out, and for listening to our little Minnesota band.
Michael Allen
Editor's note: Click here to find information on independent artist submissions.
Apologetics for Apologetix
posted 01/15/07
I feel the review of Apologetix's WordPlay misses the mark on several points. My teenagers don't care if they "know" the original songs. They love the music for what it is. In fact, they're really irritated if I slip up and start singing the original words. Yes, I've sometimes wished that Apologetix pushed the "humor" aspect of their songs a bit more, but then again, I am already "saved." I recognize a huge part of their outreach is evangelism. If I have to give up a laugh during a song for a more God-centered lyric, that's okay. Besides, if you look at their work as a whole, there is plenty of humor and fun. Just attend one of their concerts and you'll be hooked for life. I'd rank WordPlay as one of the top CDs of 2006.
Eric Huffman
posted 01/15/07
As a mom of four, I believe that the appeal of Apologetix to a broad audience is part of the excitement. My husband is a fan of classic rock that became a believer in his early twenties, so he had many years to acquire a taste for that style of music played well. I grew up with little exposure to pop. Our kids really only listen to Christian music. And we all love Apologetix. The kids like the energy of the music, but don't have to have any familiarity with the often detestable original lyrics. It's great to have a group that parents and kids can all enjoy going to see in concert, who take the time to write clever and God-honoring lyrics. Also, we love the Scripture references in the songs.
Terri Sweetland
posted 01/15/07
I became a Christian in 1982 as a 12-year-old and slowly transitioned away from secular music. I really loved listening to songs such as "Wanted Dead or Alive" by Bon Jovi, and I missed them when I left them behind. Suddenly I find the song has been redeemed. I can listen to the tune I always loved with words that inspire, and/or words that keep my mind on things of above. [As far as the target audience being too broad or unspecific], why does one have to narrow the market? Every song on every CD may not hit the mark with every listener. But which CDs ever hit the mark with each and every song? Instead of questioning their tactics and use of parody, shouldn't you just be thankful they are reaching such a wide variety of people. God does work through them; hopefully that is enough.
Jodi Ash
posted 01/15/07
Mr. Breimeier's review lists a number of his personal problems with the band. I don't think there is a "target" audience, and if he would attend any of their concerts, he would see everyone from grandkids to grandparents all having a good time. Most Apologetix CDs have at least twenty songs, so even if you only like half of them you still have a normal CD's worth of songs you like. You do not have to be familiar with the original songs to like the remakes. I have never heard of most of the original songs on Wordplay, but I like every song on the CD. I'll even crank up "Bone Digger" and I don't like rap. This is what makes Apologetix so awesome. They really do appeal to a large audience for a lot of different reasons. And although Apologetix is a parody band, they are not just a parody band. They are a Christian band with a message, and using parodies to deliver it. Mr. Breimeier doesn't seem to understand that they are not Weird Al. I think Mr. Breimeier should stop trying to figure them out, and just enjoy the music.
Wess Eslinger
Honesty the Best Policy
posted 01/15/07
As a regular reader of your newsletters, I appreciate your genuine and honest approach to Christian music. I also think it's great that you expect quality from Christian musicians and review based on the quality of an album, without major biases due to musical genre, past albums by the artist, etc. I have discovered many incredible artists through your newsletter and continue to be inspired by them, and even when I disagree with your reviews, I can tell that you are offering an honest assessment and you always support your views very well. But most of all, I enjoy reading your introduction in each newsletter. I love that you address such a wide variety of issues, which you connect back to Christian music, but also apply to many areas of life. There have been many times that I've been encouraged, challenged, and inspired by the insights you offer. Thank you for sharing your thoughts so openly. I pray that you'll know you are appreciated, be encouraged, and keep up the good work!
Angela Smith
posted 01/15/07
The insightful stuff you guys are writing and sharing is really one of the highlights of my week here in Stockholm, Sweden. Even on the days that I don't have time to read it all, I only have to sift through a few lines until a smile breaks forth. As one who's educated in both TV and radio, I'm so glad you have the guts to bring up some of the toughest topics—both the pluses and the minuses of the music business. As for those who are quick to label you "unchristian" for being disappointed with an album, that's about the most immature thing I've heard in a long time. Everyone ought to know by now that a review is a review, not an eternal truth. And if you are a true fan, why should you let a single review become a personal blow? Jesus didn't respond to his [detractors] by getting back at them or passing out irrevocable judgments. God has given us common sense, so let's use it. Honesty and vulnerability go a long way in speaking to the men and women of this world.
Åsa Gustafsson
posted 01/15/07
As a worship music director, I share your feelings regarding the criticism of Christian music. I read the reviews from various Christian music sources, [and similarly,] I hear what members of the congregation unabashedly tell me what they think of my music choices. It all has to be taken with a large grain of salt. There will never be agreement amongst Christians regarding music. Diverse taste in music is typical in most churches, and the only problem is that most people are not willing to recognize and respect that diversity. I harbor the hope that Christians will become educated in the principle that it is our identity in Christ that unites us, not our common tastes.
Brigit Parlow
Best Albums for the Best-Of List?
posted 12/11/06
I'd previously written you an email saying that there wasn't any good music or bands out there anymore, and that Christian Music had lost it's "spark" since the early 80's. Well, I'm glad to [read] your list of the Best Christian Albums of 2006. It actually blew me away—I need to get out more! This was an "ear-opening" experience for me and you guys are right on. Thanks for the great work. I've gotta stop skipping through your email and listen to what's out there. Very, very impressed!
Paul Steven
Could someone please explain to me what I'm missing with Jars of Clay's Good Monsters? Both Christian Music Today and CCM magazine picked it as best album of the year, but I was very disappointed with it after listening to it. I had heard "Carry Me" and the title track from the album on the band's MySpace page, and was excited about what I heard. It sounded like Jars of Clay was going in a new, edgier direction. What I heard on the rest of the album was music that would, in my opinion, fit well on any country music station. I don't buy CDs to get only 2 good songs from it. All the songs should be up to par; in the end, Good Monsters just didn't impress me. But kudos to Andy Argyrakis for including Skillet's Comatose as [an honorable mention]. I'm not a "Panhead" by any means, but it's an excellent album from start to finish.
Michele Schroeder
I am really glad to see Derek Webb in the top picks. I've seen little mentioned about this excellent album in 2006, other than lots of people downloading it for free. And I loved to see Jars of Clay at #1—clearly the best album of the year and possibly this decade.
Robert Blake
I just finished scrolling and reading slowly down the list of best albums, complete with imaginary drum rolls and envelope tearing sounds. Tears formed in my eyes with outbursts of laughter as album after album were by bands that I've tagged in my collection as potentially great artists whose work I'll still be listening to decades from now. Of course, I may not agree completely with every album on the final list, but I do have tremendous respect for it and will revisit a few that wouldn't have made my list to see what I missed. Thanks again & know that you've been a great encouragement to someone who's run the gamut from trashing all my "secular" music in high school and listening exclusively to [CCM], to developing a deep love and appreciation for all kinds of music.
Jay Conder
Taking a Stand
posted 11/20/06
I can imagine the review of Michael W. Smith's new CD was tough to write, but as I listened to it, I agreed with everything you said—it just doesn't measure up. When you write and record an album in 40 days, you have microwaved the music instead of allowing it to simmer over time. I guess what baffles me is that Smitty's best material was usually written with Wayke Kirkpatrick. Why doesn't he include more collaboration with Wayne these days? But as you said, hopefully his next project will regain some lost ground. I think a lot of people would love for him to return to a more acoustic sound and plain 'ol good songwriting.
Kent Sanders
I was really glad when I read about how you gave Smith's newest only two stars. No, I don't mean I'm glad you rated it low, but I'm glad that like you said, if we "believe an album falls short, we have to say so—even if we're fans of the artist—and we have to do so with grace and honesty." I really appreciate that honesty, especially in our Christian culture where everyone is supposed to "be nice and not judge."
Mary Ruth
I agree that Stand falls far short compared to Smitty's earlier albums. But is it possible that his latest albums, alongside Worship and Healing Rain, are in a completely different genre of Christian music? I think most artists establish themselves in a particular genre with their earlier works, but then they have the right to dabble in other genres over time. In Smitty's case, his recent efforts give him a solid body of work in the worship genre.
Debbie Lockledge
Stand falls short of Michael's capacity, but as I said to my friends here in France, sometimes it is better to fall short once and then come back with a bang. I believe with all my heart that Michael will come back with a stronger album.
Faith Benson
Defending the Flood
posted 11/20/06
Usually I think your reviews are pretty spot on, but not in the case of the new Sonicflood record. I completely disagree that Glimpse sounds like "note for note studio output." Has the reviewer ever listened to a Sonicflood record? Way more energy on this one [than the typical] CCM live record. I'm sorry a significant and powerful Christian publication seems to have just missed this.
Dave Howard
Editor's note: We often get letters that disagree with our reviews, and that's fine. But to ask, "Has the reviewer ever listened to such-and-such" is disingenuous. We can only say, "Duh. Of course."
Reservations for Robert Randolph
posted 11/20/06
In your interview with Robert Randolph, I feel you should have followed up on his reply that Scripture is able to say "anything." That's a false belief that many Christians have today, and reveals a clear lack of logic [in Randolph's thinking]. His attitude that he's not the "biggest Scripture reader" should also make us look at his music more critically. If you are sending a message musically in the name of the Lord, shouldn't your foundation of music be sound?
Mark Murphy
Do Greatest Hits albums still matter today?
posted 08/07/06
Thank you for raising this issue. I completely agree that "Greatest Hits" recordings used to mean something, but now I don't get them unless it's an artist I wouldn't otherwise buy. My criticism has to do with how labels have decided to add one or two new songs that you couldn't get otherwise. Of course, it had the intended effect—I would fork over the $16.98 for the new "single" from an artist I particularly liked, even though I already had the other 8-10 songs from the original albums. I find the blatant and crass commercialism of it offensive. Some labels won't even permit those new songs to be downloaded "without the purchase of the entire album," in which case I simply forego those songs in protest of the label.
David Neal
What I really hate about Greatest Hits albums these days is that they put them out while adding 1-3 new songs to it, thus almost forcing a rabid fan to spend extra money to buy a whole album for a few tracks. That is just greedy and wrong to me. An example of a band that was "greatest hitted" to death was White Heart. They [seemed to have] six Best Of albums with three different record labels. I also have to laugh when an artist (like Plumb) has a greatest hits collection after just two albums—clearly pure profit for the record company.
Lee Snyder
I buy Hits albums all the time. Not only do I get to listen to my personal favorites, but it's also a great way to discover artists that I am not familiar with. It doesn't matter what label the artists are on if they are singing for God.
Rosemary Neeley
I think the concept of a Greatest Hits album has definitely changed in the 21st century. We're now in an age of downloads, iPods, and playlists, so the end consumer can create their own "greatest hits" segment of songs with a few clicks. I noticed a recent Mark Knopfler compilation for sale, and while scanning the song titles, I couldn't help but think that it looked nearly identical to a mix CD I had already created from all of his CD's in my collection. I think that in another age, it was a brilliant idea, but the "event" factor for a Greatest Hits package is certainly lessened in this day and digital age.
Brack Haynes
I think it is a great way to introduce new Christians to music that was available before they came to know Christ. In a way, I suppose it helps keep the artist in the mind of the public—secular musicians have always done this. I really appreciate these offerings because you can usually get the great songs all on one CD.
Nora Parsons
I don't think Hits or Best Of compilations are as popular as they used to be. They are a nice way for one to get a great selection of music from an artist with whom they've just recently become familiar. That way they know their getting what most fans consider the good stuff. But I think you pegged it when you said the Internet has changed that. For anyone who is already familiar with an artist, you can easily build a Hits collection from digital downloads. And I also agree that some of the things that went into a special Hits collection of music have waned. It used to be tremendous fun to see a collection of photographs on the inside [such an album]—pouring through the credits to see who played on the songs, reading stories about why they were written, and what lasting impact the artist would have on music. In the future, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw less and less of these compilations—because of individual tastes, because of the growth of Internet sales, and because there are simply fewer artists these days producing enough great music to justify a Hits collection.
Brian Adamson
Fixing CCM
posted 07/24/06
That was some great insight by Mark Joseph in his article, "How to Fix CCM." It's sad that these labels would want to be "separate" from the world even though they're [almost] all owned by secular companies. The bottom line though is that if your music is good, people will notice regardless of a Christian message. It's about time for the dividing line to be erased, and we're finally beginning to see more than positive messages of hope for the church.
Wally Olesek
I do believe that once a person accepts Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior that their life will change for the better.The earlier article about Muth Math suing their record company made them sound as if they were ashamed to be Christians or associated with them. There are a couple of Christian bands that have successfully crossed over to mainstream music, and there's nothing wrong with that. But what's wrong with reflecting who you are to people who aren't as interested in Jesus? Isn't that what being a Christian is all about?
Marsha A. Perales
Amen to that entire commentary. It's about time someone really took a stand against this Christian subculture we have created. We are called by Christ to be in the world, to be lights for Christ in dark places. We cannot do that if we are constantly running away from the people we are supposed to try to reach. Tooth & Nail Records does this by marketing their music everywhere, even though many of the bands on the label are "Christian" bands. The success of bands such as Emery, Underoath, Anberlin, and even P.O.D. shows that it works and it gets the message of Christ out there. What more of a witness can a band have than when they play an awesome show, then share the gospel with a kid back at their merchandise table?
Mark Phillips
Mark Joseph has some good points in his article, but misses others that are pretty important.Joseph's assertion of "when the listeners enjoy the music, itwill translate to active listeners and buyers" misses out on many other factorsleading tosuccess. Not the least of which is the human condition, and how it reacts to the searing light of truth that comes from more "overtly Christian" lyrics that aren'topen to interpretation.Sin, the exclusiveness of Jesus, and the call to give up your rights are subjects that are not going to be [commonly] accepted in mainstream mass media. Many artists who are Christians will continue to see mass acceptance of their music despite (or evenbecause of) the "spiritual" content of their lyrics if it's a good listen.But I think it's naive to think that even catchy, creative, and captivating music will be widely accepted when it is accompanied by words that convict the listener.Most of us don't like to be challenged, and even those of us who do have comfort levels.There aren't too many people willing to shell out [money] to listen to a song that goes against their worldview.
Mike Hawver
The issue of how CCM should be marketed is a long running debate. At a 2002 GMA Week seminar, a vote was taken about P.O.D. and their mission to reach the un-churched by not being labeled a "Christian band." Most voted nearly 50-50 that the band needed to choose a label, one way or another. I was rather shocked; I had thought the crossover controversy had died out long ago. I remember the hits taken against Amy Grant, Michael W. Smith, and others when they became crossover artists in the '80s and '90s. But Christian industries (and even churches) are slow to change. The difficulty lies in knowing when to stop beating a dead horse, and adopting a new horse to get the job done. Over the course of the history of Christianity, different methods have had to be adapted to reach the non-believer. If shedding the label of "Christian artist" is what it takes to reach a non-Christian audience, then it's the mission of the artist to use that "adopted horse" to convey their message of faith—subtle or loudly—while living their life for Christ.
LM Oughterson
Joseph writes: "Imagine what would happen if Christian-oriented labels announced that they would change the way they do business—that for the artists who wanted to reach the mainstream, the labels would stop marketing them as 'Christian music,' and instead develop and market artists who write songs that reference their faith to fellow believers, as well as to millions of Americans who may not share their faith but like their music." One such label does exist: Illect Recordings. Hip hop is the "black sheep" of CCM, but there are true underground hip hop artists, such as those on the Illect label, that are really making inroads into the secular market.
David Yum
I've always wondered how someone who truly wanted to take the gospel to those who didn't already have it were planning to do so through the existing Christian music infrastructure. I believe that Christian artists cannot separate themselves from secular music if they want to have an evangelistic impact. Perhaps evangelism through music will have a chance after all if bands like Mute Math and Switchfoot can be models—well, maybe except for Mute Math's lawsuit.
Shane Longtin
Every artist has the free will to write and perform music that they choose. It sorrows me that some are perusing riches on earth instead of reaching for that future prize. That being said, everyone who confesses Jesus Christ as Lord has a command "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation" (Mark 16:15). What we don't see are their lives off stage. How do they conduct themselves among their family, peers, at the release parties, sitting with a fan backstage? Given the opportunity, do they share the Good News? We cannot see the heart, but God can. So let each artist select their lyrics—their lifestyle—and let God work on their heart "both to will and to do of his good pleasure."
Frank Dugie
Defining "Christian Artists"
posted 07/24/06
I don't think it's wrong for bands to try to appeal to the secular music industry. Like The Fray stated in your interview, they have a calling, and we have to trust that. I lived the majority of my life as a non-believer. It was Creed's lyrics that led me to Christ, although I didn't know it at the time. The searching to understand their lyrics led me on a search for Christ. If Creed's songs weren't played on the secular radio stations, I wouldn't know the Lord.
Paula Miller
"Bless the Broken Road" by Rascall Flatts, "I Believe" by Brooks and Dunn, "Jesus Take the Wheel" by Carrie Underwood, "Some People Change" by Montgomery Gentry"—these are all examples of Christian songs, but are they by "Christian artists?" Yes for several of them, but many others I don't know. They're not on Christian labels or Christian radio, but trying to label songs and artists by grouping them in "formats" is something secular programmers do to try and find commonalities for the sake of listeners. You ask a very tough question—I sure don't know the answer, but I do enjoy your asking it.
Dave Nicholson
Director of Country Operations
ABC Radio Networks Dallas
We're facing a similar issue with Catholic artists. Although the quality of the artists in Catholic music are not nearly at the standards of the CCM industry today, several are pioneering this change: Sarah Hart, Matt Maher, Joe Hand, Cheer Up Charlie, Marie Miller, Greg Walton, even Ceili Rain. Yet no one in the established Christian market wants to give these artists a platform for their music to be heard. Why? Because they believe in the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church? I see so many Catholic artists who live faithful lives to serve Jesus Christ as their personal Savior, their lyrics are overtly Christian, and they certainly minister outside of their music. But they never get a shot to be featured on Christian radio, or have their product offered in Christian bookstores, or be considered as media worthy by the traditional CCM market. So they are forced to stay in the market now designated as "The Catholic Market," which includes very few opportunities—yet in the U.S. alone there are 60 million Catholics!
Alyson Bleistine
Danielson's Ships come in
posted 07/24/06
I am in possession of the only "listenable" CD—that I know of—by the Danielson Famile.It's called Fetch the Compass, Kids! Brilliant and "difficult to listen to" are understatements, but it is so encouraging to see that we Christians can be as wildly creative as the rest of the world. Thank you for such a glowing report on such cutting edge Christian music!
Laurence Miller
Defending Crunk Rock
posted 07/24/06
The review of Family Force 5's debut album was inane, typical CCM nonsense and completely undeserving. This is one of the better CDs out today, full of humor, good clean/Christian fun, and a much better alternative than what most Christian bands offer. The comparisons that were made to FF5 and some other secular artists were not very well thought out.Not a good review at all. These guys are reaching people for Jesus and that's all that matters.
Brandon Abney
Family Force 5 has the potential to reach farther from the Christian music comfort zone than any band I can think of. As you said, they are entertaining and you don't have to be Christian to listen to them. But if you listen to them you will find that they are Christian. That's the nice thing about it. Missionaries reach out to places where Christ is needed, but I see many Christian artists reaching out to just Christians. I see this band portraying the fishers of men analogy; now they are casting their nets out as far as possible. Through their example, you can look for their non-Christian audience to be pulled in. I'm all for deep, meaningful lyrics, but if you look close enough, this band has a purpose.
M. Braft
A New Dawn for Andrew Osenga
posted 07/17/06
Editor's note: Andrew Osenga and his closest friends—including his family—apparently liked our 5-star review of his latest album, The Morning. Some of their comments:
I want to express my greatest appreciation for such a wonderful review of a musician I've enjoyed for a long time. Andrew Osenga's songs have long been ones to enjoy for their grand musical quality as well as a welcoming solace in a time of generic pietism in [Christian music]. Andy's music has been a healer to my soul many times, and I love his music, his art, his love of life, his love of his family, and most of all, his love for our God.
Joey Carter
I thought I was done buying CDs for a while and now you have to go and give Andrew Osenga 5 stars—great … thanks … lol. A 5-star review means I'd be a fool to not order it.
Wally Olesek
Thanks for your great review of The Morning. It is encouraging to hear him and the other members of the Square Peg Alliance making good music and to read thoughtful coverage of their albums.
Caroline Kimbrough
Thank you so much for that article! As Andy's parents, we have recognized for years that he has a special gift from God.It is nice to see that others recognize it and are able to say it so well. It is also very encouraging to read your understanding of his style, musicality, production abilities, and his heart. We keep praying that God will work in and through Andy to bring glory to himself.
Dave and Donna Osenga
Nash-tastic!
posted 06/05/06
Thanks for doing such a good job at Christian Music Today. Your interview with Leigh Nash was fantastic. She is such a unique and creative talent, and you had just the right questions to bring those qualities out. I had been wondering what she was up to since Sixpence ended, and I'm excited to hear her new stuff. I also appreciate all your hard work and insight with the interviews and reviews. It's nice to find some Christian music reviewers that aren't afraid to say an album is not good art, despite the intent to glorify God. Keep up the good work!
Troy Emenecker
Good Christians vs. Good Music
posted 02/06/06
Thank you for your words of discernment and faithfulness regarding musical response to faith. As a church musician, I find myself occasionally confronted with individuals that feel that our effort is only what is important and that the quality of our musical performance is not important—only the presence of the Spirit and the genuineness of our faith. I agree that the presence of the Holy Spirit and our faithfulness are vital, but as musicians, we are entrusted with a unique gift of expression. When we use this gift of music, it must never intrude on or distract from the message. When the performance is poor (or worse), that is what will [ultimately] receive the attention. Good Christian music, whether for listening or worship, must be transparent enough to allow the Spirit and message to get through.
Steve Wood
posted 02/06/06
What constitutes good music depends on the person you are talking to. There are many mediocre talents who have had great success due to marketing and PR, and there are many great talents that get overlooked because of lack of marketing and PR. The most important thing is for a Christian artist to do what God tells him to do—if making music is what God tells him to do, then that is nobody else's business to refute that.
Deborah Reece
posted 02/06/06
Regarding people who equate faith with talent, I can't help but think of the American Idol auditions. So many of the contestants have such sincere desire ("Music is my LIFE!") and sing with such earnestness, but they can't carry a tune to save their lives! I commend you for boldly stating that not all Christians make great music. My husband and I listen to all kinds of music from hard rock to jazz, but when we it comes to Christian music, it's very hard to find the same diversity and talent. We wade through a lot of generic pop that all sounds the same—no matter how sincere the heart of the artist!
Laura McBride
Stand-ing Up for Avalon
posted 02/06/06
I fully disagree with your review of Avalon's Stand. Yes, they are changing their style, but at least they can pull it off. The lyrics are fine. Some of these songs are just what people need to hear. The real point of Christian music is for the artist to minister to the public through song. That is exactly what Avalon is doing. Just because a song doesn't have the deepest lyrics in the world doesn't render it useless. Christian music doesn't have to fit critics' standards for God to work through it. Keep an open mind.
Lisa Tober
posted 02/06/06
Regarding your review of Stand: I couldn't agree more. I mean what were they thinking? You are totally right about the song "Jesus"—the whole idea of this Holy One who took my sin, shed his blood and rose again is a totally washed up message. And you're right: We need to quit saying "God is love" in Christian songs today and instead talk about all the misery that Christians go through in their walk with Christ. Avalon is just too happy all the time, don't you agree?
Ben Greene
Editor's note: No, sarcasm is definitely not lost on us.
For Those Who Have Ears …
posted 01/16/06
I recently discovered your excellent Glimpses of God column and would like to thank you for your careful and prayerful consideration of the artists and songs featured. I started my own Live365 internet radio station almost two years ago along these lines, playing songs by mainsteam artists that lyrically lean toward God and heaven. I am amazed at discovering new finds almost daily! I have been using your column and its archives to update my own playlist, and it's been a true blessing.
Peter Liam Holcross
T-Bone Blinded by Bling?
posted 01/16/06
I was highly interested in your interview with Christian hip-hop artist T-Bone. I am highly supportive of hip-hop music as a ministry, and I have heard many artists who have served Christ powerfully through it. [However], I think T-Bone is doing a terrible job. It's not that he lacks skill, but because of his blatantly hypocritical life. Despite the fact that he wants to rap for God, T-Bone dishonors his Lord by promoting the materialism and pride of secular hip-hop. We all know that the hip-hop genre of the world is polluted with violence, sexual immorality, and shady living, but we also need to realize that bling and egotism are just as bad. When T-Bone boasts of his wealth and rapping skill, he is sinning against God through pride. I think God could use him more if he were willing to sacrifice his ego and his materialistic spirit.
Andy_Rew
Not Nice to Diss the Audience
posted 01/16/06
4th Avenue Jones may have a cool style, but they slammed the audience hard at 2005's Spirit West Coast. Apparently we "sucked," and when we finally cheered enough to win back their approval, they rocked out to a Nirvana song. People in the Word look to Christian artists for motivation and hope, not to be told that they suck.
Jeannie Borbe
Mixed Reactions to Post-Christmas Releases
In a recent newsletter, we asked if you rushed out right after Christmas to buy new albums. Here are some replies.
posted 01/16/06
I did buy FFH's new release the week it came out, but with all the new music I had received for Christmas, I wasn't in a terrible rush to pick up new music. If it hadn't been for a gift card, I wouldn't have bought FFH's album. Record labels would do much better if they released these albums before the holidays [so I could ask for them for Christmas]. I was shocked when I saw the number of CDs being released two days after Christmas!
Jeffrey Thomas
posted 01/16/06
I did not rush out to buy new Christian Music. I'm more interested in knowing which of the labels are picking up on the trend to go straight to the Internet with their projects, bypassing the normal brick and mortar channels altogether. That's definitely the wave of the future.
Roger A. Dills
posted 01/16/06
I'm a music freak, so I always try to buy a new release the day it drops. December 27 was no exception—I went on a rabid search for the new Derek Webb CD. I would have picked it up on its release day no matter what time of year!
Bill Newton
posted 01/16/06
Marketers need to understand that most buyers are exhausted after the holidays, and that we tend to cut back on spending after Christmas. After all, most of us have overspent their budgets by that point.
Bill Jarocki
Protest and Praises
posted 01/16/06
I couldn't help but notice that your album reviewer(s) thinks that absolutely nothing sounds good—specifically in reviews of harder rock albums like Disciple, Skillet, and Pillar. Though any band has room for improvement, it's sad to hear someone bash such strong and amazing groups. Hard rock and metal are generally less melodic. If you like melodic music, look somewhere else and review something your ears can handle.
Justin W.
Editor's note: Our reviews of Disciple, Skillet, and Pillar have ranged from 3 stars (good) to 4 stars (excellent) in the last 5 years, the exception being Pillar's 2004 release Where Do We Go From Here, which we gave 2½ stars (fair). We're simply trying to be objective with our observations, and it's worth noting that each review only represents a single opinion.
posted 01/16/06
Just thought I'd say "amen" to your review of Derek Webb's latest album, Mockingbird. I love it, but I agreed with everything you said as well—you review well!
Mark A. Almlie
posted 01/16/06
Thank you for the wonderful review of The Mission Bell by Delirious. Your review is very visual, and I can tell you really know this band well and appreciate what they bring to their fans.
Carolyn Dawkins
posted 01/16/06
Thanks for such a great review of Nothing Is Sound. I'm glad to see a Christian reviewer that is not afraid to address Switchfoot's honest view of life—good and bad, bitter and sweet. I also smiled about your comment that it "would be nice to see Switchfoot go beyond topics about the search for meaning and truth in the postmodern world." I found that amusing, because they seem to be aware of the penchant, too. Jon Foreman said once himself that in the end, maybe Switchfoot is just writing one really long song.
Debra Glover
Being un-churched and disconnected from the greater Christian community, I didn't have a clue about the music scene. I was trying to buy a gift for a lady who gives so much of her time at a local drug rehab ministry. Music seemed the right gift, but I was at a loss. Then Google led me to your Best of 2005 list and I found Matthew West. He is so awesome that I will be buying a copy for my friend and one for me. Thanks for your insightful reviews.
Renee Schiber
posted 01/16/06
Thank you for regularly making good theological and business observations about the Christian music industry. You're one of the few doing it, and doing it well.
Gregory Rumburg
Stapp Judgments
Editor's note: We received a number of e-mails in response to the recent news that Scott Stapp got into a brawl in one incident and did a TV interview while drunk in another.
posted 12/13/05
I just watched Stapp on Spike TV, and he is completely drunk and setting new records for obscenity bleeps. He is about as much of a Christian as Howard Stern. Do you have no discretion? How could you in good conscience recommend this to Christians? He's offending the secular hosts! He can't complete a sentence without being bleeped! You are proving to me that you have no credibility in Christian circles.
Mark Rognstad
posted 12/13/05
I'm not trying to bash anyone's reputation; I just wanted to express my disappointment. I saw Mr. Stapp on TV, and I believe he was drunk. He was cussing up a storm on that show, when he was forming complete sentences, otherwise it was mumbling and asking the co-host for a kiss. I was really hurt that the lead singer of a band I was listening to on my way to church looked like some bum off of the street.
Brittany Linson
posted 12/13/05
Scott Stapp is a hypocrite. I'll never listen to his songs now. I'm disappointed.
Eric Demers
Throw a Bone to T-Bone
posted 10/03/05
I think your review [of Bone-A-Fide] is missing the point to T-Bone's music. He's not on the microphone trying to remind the saved that Jesus is the answer. He is appealing to the lost who are on drugs or into gangs. Sure, he might boast here and there, but [to some extent] he has the right to. No other rapper that I have heard can do all the things he does over the microphone or articulate the way he does with his lyrics.
I agree he shouldn't [focus so much] on materialistic things. That is one thing about Bone that has always bugged me a bit, and I appreciate acts like GRITS and Cross Movement from steering away from that. But that said, if you see a man struggling with the problems that T-Bone often refers to, don't you think an album like Bone-A-Fide might be a tool to bring that lost soul home to the Father? I feel the review spent too much time criticizing T-Bone, focusing on a few [misguided] lines and leaving the reader to assume that T-Bone is only about money and fame, instead of [focusing on the positives of his music].
Marco
Editor's note: Andree Farias rated Bone-A-Fide three-and-a-half stars, which is by definition "very good." The review does primarily focus on the positives of T-Bone's music. Unfortunately, we can only mention so much within the space of a review. We have an interview running in the near future that calls more attention to his heart for God and the good he is doing. Still, when both reader and reviewer are uncomfortable with T-Bone's apparent focus on ego and material things, it's precisely why we can't give more glowing praise to such a well-intentioned, excellent sounding album.
A Bang-Up Job!
posted 10/03/05
Thanks so much for your excellent review of A Collision by the David Crowder Band. I've known these guys for a decade and they're even better people than musicians if you can believe that! You hit the nail on the head saying it's a daunting task to review such a layered work, but you did a great job. We're excited for more people to "Come Awake" to the DCB, and more importantly, to come awake to Christ through their work.
Blair Browning
Perfect Beginning for Bates
posted 09/26/05
I just wanted to respond to your review of the Josh Bates album, Perfect Day.
I love the message of his music. So many Christian singers today are nothing more than performers looking to make a break into the "business." Josh is extremely talented and differentiates himself from them.
As a born again believer, it is so refreshing to hear an artist who sings from his heart and sounds great while doing so. The combination of inspirational songs and worship tunes make for an enjoyable album. While most albums have a couple good songs and the rest are just mediocre, that's not the case with this one—every song is good. I predict that he will be a huge hit because of his refreshing sound and sincerity.
Debbie Coffman
Raves Reviews of Reviews
posted 09/26/05
Your reviews have had a significant influence on what I've been listening to lately. I've come to realize that a lot of the music that gets heavy airplay on the radio is mediocre or worse, and that there's plenty of excellent music out there that doesn't get radio exposure. Keep up the great work!
Matt Campbell
posted 09/26/05
Thank you for such an incredible review of Switchfoot's new album, Nothing is Sound. Your amazing insight into the progression of the band's last few albums is something that I have not heard anyone else comment on. Switchfoot is moving towards the light, progessing through topics of redemption, restlessness, and a higher meaning in life, bringing this generation along with them on their quest for truth. Your well-explained description of their music and lyrics was refreshingly honest and un-biased—truly one of the best reviews I've read this year. I hope your review helps open the eyes of many people to the Switchfoot phenomenon.
Jeremy Doran
posted 09/26/05
Wow, were you ever right about Andrew Peterson. I took a listen online, and he is the best-kept secret of CCM. I am definitely going to get his CD. Thanks for the tip!
Ann Heady
posted 09/26/05
I just want to say how much I enjoy and appreciate the reviews at Christian Music Today. You're being used by God to draw folks to music they might have missed, such as Andrew Peterson's recent album. The critics are outstanding with their insight, and while the reviews are not always positive, it's all part of encouraging one another to do our best for God. Please count this as encouragement for a job well done.
Mark Geil
No Negative Reviews, Please
posted 09/26/05
I have followed the Christian Rock movement for the past 10 years and have read many reviews of various artists. I think reviews need to focus on the brighter side of the spectrum. Look for the good in what the group encompasses or presents lyrically, in studio or live in concert, and tell the reader what they enjoyed about the band. When one points out the negative aspects, it only proves that the writer has issues or confidence problems, and that he has to elevate himself by bringing others down. An exceptional writer is one who can play down the negatives, and search to find the good in what these artists do for the world. They are on a mission and they deserve to be recognized for it, not belittled.
Carolyn Dawkins
Bravo, Bethany!
posted 09/26/05
Thank you for covering Bethany Dillon and her new CD, Imagination! She has definitely grown as an artist and its great to see a girl my age earning recognition for praising God. Imagination compliments her first album and I really look forward to seeing her continue to grow and mature as "the future of Christian music." If she represents the future, then I'll always be here!
Cristy Rangel
Wishing the Best for Amy…
posted 09/26/05
I would like to congratulate Amy Grant on her new show Three Wishes. LeMars, Iowa was one of Amy's first stops for filming the show. During the time, I had the opportunity to meet and talk with her. Amy's heart is definitely in this show. She is not jumping on the bandwagon. She is not in this show for herself, but for the sake of others. I guess if I could have a wish it would be that people wouldn't be so quick criticize the success of others.
Stacey O'Hara
posted 09/26/05
I agree with you regarding how the Lord is using Amy Grant in "Three Wishes". It is a blessing to see His Hand everywhere. Why do so many criticize what they don't know? Only God knows our motives. What people may or may not be aware of is how many private charities Amy Grant has helped during nearly all of her career/ministry in music (without anyone else knowing about it).
Lisa Minnerly
… And the Worst
posted 09/26/05
I really don't care to have anything to do with a so-called "Christian" newsletter or publication that holds people to absolutely no ethical standards, much less "Christian" morality. What is the point of your newsletter if it's all just religious talk and no substance? You are known by the company you keep. How about an interview with Hugh Hefner? At least he lives what he preaches.
Terry Roberts
Jaci V's Divorce
Editor's note: We received a number of e-mails in response to our news article about Jaci Velasquez's recent divorce. Here's a sampling.
posted 08/29/05
I think many young Christians are some of the most inadequately prepared people for marriage, and this is especially true of young artists in the spotlight. In general, marriage expectations are unrealistic. I have been married 31 years to a minister, and I still feel this pressure. I am not saying there are no good materials or no good instruction out there; and I am the last person to deny personal responsibility and accountability for decisions and conduct. But I firmly believe that the Christian church and Christian media dropped the ball a long time ago. And I think many Christians are some of the most unrealistic and unthinking people around. I am not angry; I have just been around a long time.
Elizabeth Ball
posted 08/29/05
I am struck by the sadness of the announcement of Jaci Velasquez's recent divorce. I cannot help but consider how reflective her own experience is of what many Christians are experiencing in the way of devastating divorce. I wished that her explanation that her marriage "took a turn" had been more about taken responsibility, instead of shifting it to some cosmic influence, not for any reason except to move on toward restoration and healing. Her words are perhaps more revealing than was intended when she said that she is "learning how to live out the words of 'Lay It Down' daily," referencing the lyrics to one of her recent songs. I wonder, "What about living out God's words, not your own?" There is healing in those words, and perhaps relief from the public life that no doubt will make her journey back a hard and difficult one.
Marc Fey
posted 08/29/05
How disheartening to read that Jaci Velasquez and her husband are divorcing after less than 2 years! Where is her faith if it got her no further than that of the typical route of the celebrity who doesn't know Christ? She needs our prayers. I can't imagine how she will sing the same type of songs with conviction again.
L. Cook
posted 08/29/05
Stop referring to Christian artists as superstars, please. You are only putting them on a pedestal and then watching them fall off.
Ian Watson
posted 08/29/05
With all due respect, I find the reporting of this "news" contrary to your stated intent to remain matter-of-fact, without judgment, and respectful. The article violates Ms. Velazquez's own request: "I am still in the healing process and ask for your prayers and consideration for my privacy" by quoting from the 2004 interview, then going on to "rate" her divorce as "the highest-profile divorce in Christian music since Amy Grant's 1999 divorce from Gary Chapman," as if we as Christians should really be interested in keeping this kind of score. We should be lifting each other up, rather than resorting to tabloid-type reporting.
Bob Potemski
Crossover Artists Ineffective?
posted 07/27/05
I think it may be telling that you called the original article a "thoughtful commentary" and the response "controversial." This may be showing the overall bias of Christian Music Today. That set aside, we should look at the actual fruit of crossover artists. MxPx started out with this philosophy and now their message is moot and they are considered just another punk band. A lot of these bands do go in with good motivations but eventually after a few albums writing more and more for the secular marketplace the lyrics lose any and all spiritual meaning. Look at the overt Christian content on P.O.D.'s Southtown compared to Payable on Death. If you played that album to any non-Christian, they couldn't tell if they were Christian or not. Once that happens, a band loses relevance. What ultimately happens to these bands is they just become part of the static that is the secular music market place. It's not to say that a band can't cross over and make an impact, just the more they format their lyrics for the mainstream the more they lose any witness in the world's eyes. As far as artists like Mallonee and Sarah Masen, on an indie label they only have about 12 listeners anyway. They may be reaching a few people who like to listen to more esoteric music, but the spiritual message in most artsy albums you have to peel away four levels of poetic nonsense to get the message. To use a word I find in a lot of your reviews, the lyrics aren't "accessible."
Mark Murphy
The Secular-Sacred Divide
Last week, we addressed the topic of secular vs. sacred music—and whether there should be a line between the two. We tackled the issue in a thought-provoking commentary by Kate Bowman, and again in our weekly newsletter a couple of days later. Here are some reader reactions:
posted 07/18/05
Excuse me, but how are people going to get saved if Christian artists don't get their message out into the mainstream? Isn't that the whole purpose of being in ministry? Some of these legalistic Christians need to get their heads out of the sand. Personally, I have no use for such for Christians who want to isolate themselves from the "real" world. They need to grow up.
Deborah Reece
posted 07/18/05
In regard to the "sacred or secular," as much as we would like to hold on to those artists and have them only sing about Christianity, we should realize that these artists are trying to spread God's Word to those who haven't heard it. We will see the effects of this with Switchfoot's August release Nothing is Sound. Will Switchfoot stick to their roots? Or will they seek to stray from the Christian music scene? Switchfoot is the biggest crossover yet, and I pray that they would not lose sight of God. Indeed, I wonder whether there should even be a "Christian" genre, because it may hurt the witnessing and ultimately the success of the artist. Success for a Christian artist is not defined by album sales, but by taking advantage of the opportunity to spread God's Word.
Dean Burrier
posted 07/18/05
A point that I think we miss on this topic is the issue of Christian music created and done with little concern for shaping the music crossover success, but wanting the music to be available to those outside the church. To clarify, I am a gospel jazz artist and I want to reach audiences outside the church with the message of life in Christ, but I'm not forming my songs and production to get a big mainstream hit. If I do, fine. But songs like "Oh Happy Day" and "We Fall Down" weren't planned crossover hits. My priority is to address the hopelessness and be a witness of God's character through creative and innovative music.
Tyrone Birkett
posted 07/18/05
While I certainly agree that Christians need to have an impact on their culture, one thing that has happened too frequently is that the impact has gone both ways. When I read articles about Christians (artists or not) involved in adulterous affairs and other sex scandals, becoming addicted to alcohol, drugs, and so many other tragedies, it appears to me that the church has somehow failed to prepare Christians for the process of moving out into the culture. Before holding up artists as shining examples of making the crossover, some consideration needs to be made of what spiritual compromises have been made to make that jump.
Larry W. Virden
posted 07/18/05
I see "Christian" music as serving maybe three purposes: providing entertainment for Christians, providing an avenue of praise and worship of God, or providing a message to a non-believer. I am personally on the fence with this issue. With the old Petra concerts, you could take a non-believer for some kickin' Christian rock and count on a Christian message and invitation, or if you bought a CD, the lyrics clearly directed you to God. But if I buy a Switchfoot or Mae CD, am I directed to God with the lyrics? If I go to their concert, am I directed to God by a message, testimony or handout? I don't know, I haven't been yet. If no to both of those, we should not promote them as a Christian group. If Switchfoot or Mae or others are not inviting/leading the crossover world to Christ, then they are missing the mark and a wonderful opportunity.
If they wear the label 'Christian', then it should show and not be hidden so deep that you have to assume they mean something spiritual in a song.
Darrell Fox
posted 07/18/05
I have always understood Christian music to be of the type inspired by the Holy Spirit designed to bring honor and glory to God. There should be always be a real message. Is that the purpose of today's Christian music? Are we seeking through this medium to woo the unsaved multitudes into God's Kingdom? What is the motivation? We most certainly are blessed with some excellent writers and performers making good use of their God-given talents, but there is one great danger: that the main goal is not just fame and fortune. May the music of God's name refresh our souls! There is a standard to be maintained.
Ernest Mills
posted 07/18/05
The thing about Christianity is that it's getting all mixed up. If you listen to music that does not uplift the Lord, then it is uplifting the enemy, right? Inspirational is one thing, but the message is still uplifting. I just don't think we should get the lines blurred on the rest.
Nicole Butler
GMA Prez Responds
posted 07/18/05
Thanks for your report about the decisive move by the Supreme Court regarding Grokster v. MGM. But there was an important statement made in the piece that is misleading: "In other words, it's now a federal crime to use file-sharing programs in order to download music that you have not purchased." To clarify, the unauthorized downloading of music has always been a federal crime. The courts have now made it clear that the P2P services themselves can be held liable for contributory infringement. Individuals who infringe on copyrights by downloading from P2Ps have always been liable.
John Styll, President
GMA/CMTA
In Defense of Inhabited
posted 07/18/05
Regarding your review of Inhabited: I personally know this band and have watched them grow up as children. I taught them in Sunday school and also in other programs later in life, and they have one mission: to reach others for the sake of Christ's death. They are not here to entertain you in how loud they play their music. Marcus is one of the most talented young men in the business, and Sara sounds nothing like Rebecca St. James.
Tommy Jenkins
The Bell's Still Ringin'
posted 06/13/06
Thank you, thank you, thank you for the article "The Bell Tolls." I help lead a service for people in their 20s & 30s in our church and am having an impossible time finding music right now. Didn't know if it was just me. I walk in and out of our local Christian bookstore without finding anything that is either lyrically resonating or that catches me musically. And when I find one, it is generally without the other! Thanks for drawing attention to our need for deep, artistic, and truthful worship music.
Jenny Matthes
posted 06/13/06
I think the problem with much Christian music today is the same problem facing most (all?) pop music today: it's pablum. Pop music (and I'm including pop Christian music here) today is boring, repetitive, insomnia-curing; the lyrics tend to be uninspired and repetitive, too. The artists all sound the same. That's why I prefer the old-time gospel/country gospel/"Black" gospel/"Negro" spirituals of yesteryear. That kind of music includes a hunger for the Lord and passionately reflects that love, gratitude, worship for him; these "old" songs do that in a way that most pop music today doesn't. What Christian artists need to do, I think, is not branch out into the boring world of pap, uh, pop music, but reach into their passion for the Savior and convey that passion afresh to their listeners who thirst for music that touches the soul.
Sherry Soobotin
posted 06/13/06
In response to the article on Steve Bell: I am a pastor who has played guitar for the past 17 years. When it comes to songs for a radio station or CD, I agree that it's great to be as "artsy" as possible. But when it comes to worship music, as a pastor I consider that art should be secondary to facilitating worship. Worship music is like a language: we can try to re-create the past (perhaps using Latin) or we can seek to speak in the popular language of the day in order to communicate with as many people as possible. A church could hire the best, most artistically creative pipe organ player and opera singer; but no matter how good they are, it would sink most churches faster than the Titanic, simply because that language is far less popular. Inside the church, our "likes" need to take a back seat to the musical language(s) that have the widest appeal. Our assessment of its artistic value is not worth any more than the assessment of those who hunted down Tyndale, simply because they thought English vulgar. You can try to fight it, but personally I side with Tyndale! I am not a proponent of an art form; I am a proponent of the gospel. Music cannot transform a life and save a soul. As a 35-year-old musician, and someone who likes books from antiquity, I agree that it would be nice if people preferred our music over that of 17-year-olds. However, instead of being Sauls resenting the Davids of our time, let's pass the torch rather than waiting until we are so old that there is no one to pass it to! May we try to help them; mentor them; and facilitate their ministries. Let's rejoice that Delirious broke open the doors of worship in a language that an entire generation could appreciate! I am thankful that gifted musicians such as Martin Smith have generally tried to keep their worship songs simple, so that the others can use them on Sundays without having to practice for five years. I wish all worship writers would recognize that it doesn't have to be difficult to be brilliant.
Cory Schmidtz
An Honest Review
posted 06/13/06
Thank you for such an honest and straightfoward review on Krystal Meyers. This is the first Christian music review that I have ever read that addresses the fact that Christian artists (not just secular artists) follow generic song topics and formulas. I have noticed for years that some artists just simply aren't as spiritually deep as others, and their lyrics lack deeper insight or wisdom past the generic "God loves me, I love him, I surrender" themes that are so prevalent in lighter artists. I agree that Krystal's CD delivers what it promised: a cool-sounding rock chick delivering radio-listener-friendly music that entertains but doesn't challenge. Pointing out the artists who do "delve into relevant teen issues" like BarlowGirl and Superchick shows that it is not mutually exclusive to create great music that appeals to everyone while sharing a deeper part of God's truths. Thanks for a surprisingly insightful review. You were objective, concise, and refreshingly refrained from negative comments in this excellent review of a somewhat simple yet entertaining debut.
Jeremy Doran
Like a Rolling Stone
posted 06/07/05
It's quite refreshing to find a site that actually is willing to "critique and even criticize" Christian music and its artists. Most CCM-type sites are usually very positive in all their reviews. Your reviews make me feel like I'm reading a Rolling Stone type of review. Kudos, and I'm so glad I found your comprehensive site.
Cara Shin
Mixed Emotions in Morocco
posted 05/24/05
I appreciated your article on Friendship Fest. I attended the event, and it certainly produced a mix of emotions for me. Amazement that such a festival could take place in a Muslim country. Joy that Moroccans could hear/see God's love through the musicians and the Christians in the crowd. Fear as I was surrounded by Moroccan men who were high on hash and getting out of control. Sadness as I realized how few of the people around me knew the One to and about whom we were singing. My prayer is that someone in that crowd will begin to question, to search, for the one true God because of what they heard at Friendship Fest.
Mariellyn Dunlap
About Joy …
posted 05/09/05
Your review of Joy Williams' new CD does a great job of describing and summarizing everything in it, especially that new fresh sound. Genesis is aptly titled because the sound is new (for her at least), and the common theme seems to be redemption and rebirth, a fresh look at life through eyes of faith. But I think the song "I'm in Love with You" is a lot better than you gave it credit for. I like it because it's so personal. That makes it all the more real and encouraging, even for those who are single. Also, her voice in some of the songs does resemble Rebecca St. James a little, but that's her true voice. If you listen to "Falling on My Knees" on the WOW Worship album, her voice does the same inflections and nuances as on this album. I don't think she's trying too hard at all. Everything sounds natural. Apart from these comments, I really enjoyed your review.
Jeremy Doran
posted 05/09/05
I did not agree with your criticism of the way Joy Williams sings. It's not "gimmicky vocal techniques"—that's the way she sings. I think you were a little too harsh on one of Christian music's finest voices.
Justin Kirkendall
Heroic Effort
posted 05/09/05
Thank you for your wonderful review of House of Heroes. They are genuine and sincere with who they are and what they are about. I have seen them grow and mature from punky youth group kids into men of God. They consistently affirm their integrity not only in their art and work ethic, but also with their lives and the company they keep. Please continue to follow the band, as I believe they have all the makings and are deserving of the best that God can give. And you are correct—they rock. Thank you for your review and for spreading the buzz.
Ron VanHorn
Good Reviews!
posted 05/02/05
I've bought a number of albums based upon your reviews. I've found that your reviews are right-on in terms of the descriptions of the music, production, musicianship, content, and lyrics. Also, you tend to be able to see typical radio-friendly Christian MOR for what it really is—an advertisement to sell lots of safe music to the masses. (Oops. I promised myself that I wouldn't be critical. Sorry.) Keep up the good work.
Gary D. Kersey
posted 05/02/05
Thank you for your honest review of Lost in Wonder by Ashton, Denté, and Tumes. I am a fan of all three of these singers, yet I agree with the review. I find that often there are not honest reviews concerning Christian music because of the need to be nice. However, by being "nice," the reviewer is not being fair to the buyer.
Steven Dougherty
Connecting with 'Connection'
posted 05/02/05
I am a 42-year-old graying pastor of a rural church and not really the type you would think would have an interest in CCM music. I do like a lot of what I hear, and a lot that is not my taste. But one thing I do enjoy is reading Music Connection. Your reviews and insights are interesting and informative. I appreciate your critical eye, and the article about the attitudes of the Christian media at the recent GMA awards was good—especially when you turned the critique on yourself. Keep up the good work, and thanks for wanting to write in a Christian spirit about an industry that is to be focused on Christ.
Frank Purvis
Ministry, Not Money
posted 05/02/05
Regarding your Donnie McClurkin review: If your critic doesn't understand the structure, reverence or homage of the traditional Black Church, then they should stick with writing about what they know! This CD has united the old and the young in all races and walks of life. It is not the intention of this CD to have 20 consecutive number 1 hits, but to be reminded of the days of old. I bought this CD for myself and my mother took it from me! This CD is about ministry, NOT money!
LyKinda Warner
Radio Tripe
posted 05/02/05
I'm glad to hear/see that I'm not the only one who doesn't care too much for the Christian radio tripe that they're playing over and over and over ad nauseum. There is SO much out there that blows CCM away. I suppose there are those that love the candy-coated stuff, but I used to be a funk/bluesman/kinda grunge rocker, and it's hard to find stuff out there that meets that criteria. Will Derryberry and Glenn Kaiser are good. Skillet's new disc blew me away too. It's out there.
Scott Enriquez
CCM Washed Out
posted 05/02/05
I agree that CCM had become washed out. Many artists are nothing but manufactured Christian versions of their secular counterparts. Rare are the groups that experiment with creativity and develop their own sound. There are exceptions, like Jars of Clay and Out of Eden, who've always created their own music without following formulas for lyrics or sound. But, perhaps due to the heavy presence of formulaic pop music in the secular genre, Christian music over the last decade(s) has relaxed its conviction. Clichés are abundant and very few artists write or play their own music. However, over the last two years or so, I have seen an incredible surge of artistry among new artists—like Bethany Dillon, Starfield, Bebo Norman, Shawn McDonald, MuteMath, and Joy Williams. They're just a few of the new artists who have emerged lately to bring a "fresh breath of air" to the radio and CDs. Christian music seems to be on an upswing, returning to a deeper faith of solid biblical truths instead of the ambiguous Oprah-fied feel-good music we had to put up with for too long.
Jeremy Doran
No Use for Doves
posted 05/02/05
All I can say is that if Jars of Clay was not voted group of the year and Who We Are Instead album of the year, I had no use for the Dove Awards. But as you said, those awards are not the be all and end all. What really counts is lives changed and affected by the love of Christ through their music—and in that category, Jars wins hands down!
Caralynn Kurta
Raves for Cave
posted 05/02/05
I'd like to compliment Russ Breimeier on his article about Nick Cave and his religious views. Cave has been a favorite of mine for years, yet I have never been able to identify where he stands. I really enjoyed the lack of conclusion from your author, because there really is no way to tell with Cave. I don't know how familiar the author is with Cave, but his album No More Shall We Part is heavily laced with religious songs—like "God Is in the House," "Oh My Lord," "Hallelujah" and "Gates to the Garden." I love to read about Cave, but this article was very out of the ordinary to the usual pieces on him. Nice work.
Robert Carrillo
Bored by Christian Music?
Editor's note: We received a number of letters in reply to our April 5 newsletter, in which we noted that many people seemed bored with contemporary Christian music. Some of the responses:
posted 04/13/05
Your article was so true. Christian radio today is bad. Air1 radio is supposed to be for teens, but they only play about four songs, and they are all pop-punkish or something boring like that. I never hear them play bands like Pillar, Project 86, or Norma Jean. Sometimes they will play a worship song from Skillet or Thousand Foot Krutch, but they won't play the hard rock. I wish there were a heavy Christian radio station on the air, as Christian rock seems to be the only type of music that has any sort of innovation.
Alex Bernardo
posted 04/13/05
One reason Christian music is formulaic—besides the limited taste, talent, imagination and ability of some producers, as well as their egos—is simple: money! I believe record execs and a few producers are looking for a safe, tried-and-true money-making formula. There is nothing wrong with making money, but in my opinion the fear of not making money limits the thinking of people in Christian music. Many Christian labels have been bought by huge non-Christian behemoths who have been peddling violence, death, perversion, lasciviousness, the occult and every other malady to our kids. These people certainly know how to market garbage and make billions of dollars by appealing to the basest aspects of human nature, while at the same time destroying our culture and society. How much do they care about making godly music, being creative and producing art (not the modern puke that passes for art)?
Mic Lawler
posted 04/13/05
Actually I find the music on my Christian radio station (99.1 in New York City) to be pretty good, although a little too diverse for my tastes sometimes. I also listen to Know Radio, which plays a wonderful mixture of contemporary Christian and gospel music from artists both established and indie.
Carl Fritsche
posted 04/13/05
There is an awesome radio station called Effect Radio that plays all the latest songs and I never get sick of listening to it. You can hear great music from up-and-coming artists, artists that you love, and there are NO commercials!
Andrea Grove
posted 04/13/05
I seldom listen to anything (radiowise) but the local classical music station. And I am hardly ever bored, except when they are playing some lengthy violin sonata. When I want to listen to Christian music, I turn to my CDs and tapes, with plenty to choose from—especially Celtic Christian music.
John G. Pierce
Focus on the Art
posted 04/13/05
Why does your review of Sara Groves' Station Wagon, intended to invoke the joys that we revel in when we have kids, begin and end with a focus on market appeal and building a fan base? Groves, to my delight, writes songs about hope, joy, love, sacrifice, and the passion of parenthood. It is pure and wonderful art, free from the pallid constraints of CCM formulas. Most music enthusiasts and Groves fans do not care about gold albums or stadium seating. We care about artists who speak the truth in love in ways that move our souls and open our imaginations. Praise God for Sara Groves. Perhaps her "endless well of creativity" comes from her being in touch, not with market appeal, but with what God is doing in her life today. I would love to see future reviews that are less "industry" focused and more focused on the art of the artist.
Jay Slocum
No Future for CCM?
posted 04/13/05
I find your site disconcerting because you speak of what you call "contemporary Christian music." That is a misnomer since most of this stuff has no real Christian depth, is boring, caters to emotions rather than the heart, is trite, tacky, not worth the time it takes, is often raucous, is vapid, is much of the time not biblical, and ignores people like me who might like occasionally to learn something about the great sacred music of the Masters, such as Mozart, Bach, Haydn, Handel, Brahms, Mendelssohn, and others. You let the public down by giving them news of something that has no future.
Mildred Perry Miller
Digging Paul Colman
posted 04/04/05
What an excellent and insightful interview with Paul Colman. So often people assume even Christian artists are rich and famous and unlike the rest of us. People need to hear the truth. I appreciated his heart for God. Thank you very much.
Cindy McIntyre
OOE Deserves Better
posted 04/04/05
I was surprised at your condescending review of Out of Eden's Hymns. I almost forgot I was reading a Christian review because it sounded as judgmental as the reviews in secular magazines. Isn't it hard enough to create a great album that is musically, lyrically, and spiritually strong without being confined to one style of music? Who's to say OOE can't experiment with a new sound or new genre? I listened to their new CD and I really like it. It's a fresher, lighter sound than their usually deep R&B. An artist should be allowed to try new things, but society seems to be allergic to creative exploration. I'm a musician, and I think the WORST thing I could ever do is create a defined niche for myself and then never explore any other music. It is all the MORE to OOE's credit that they have created a new sound for Hymns.
Jeremy Doran
Horrible & Prejudiced?
posted 04/04/05
Your reviews are so prejudiced. Superchic[k] got ripped for sounding like someone else and not being very creative or different from previous albums. People want this music; they listen to Superchic[k] because they sound like Avril Lavigne, but with a more God-centered message. Then I read Natalie Grant's review and it is just praise after praise. What the heck? She sounds like all contemporary Christian artists—no uniqueness whatsoever. So the bands that do have a more distinct sound are ripped and the conformists are praised. I don't get it.
Philip Colvin
Consuming Culture?
posted 3/21/05
In response to your article about Christian colleges hosting secular concerts: One of the hallmarks of evangelicalism has always been its commitment to engage culture. However, there is a fine line between engagement and consumption. Fundamentalism took Christianity underground after Scopes, turning it into a separationist disengaged subculture; Evangelicalism brought Christianity back into the light when it re-engaged culture in the early '50s. Since then, though, the tension for evangelical engagement has always been, how close is too close to culture? When does our desire to be "in the world" overcome our conviction to be "not of it"? When in our effort to become "all things to all men" do we become just like everyone else? I would suggest it happens when we begin to "consume" culture. True engagement requires a certain spiritual and emotional distance from culture that allows us, as believers in Christ, to provide a powerful counter-cultural perspective and alternative to the cultural messages and icons of the non-believing world. When as believers we become consumers of culture, though, we are very close to becoming not just supporters, but promoters of those who espouse false beliefs and destructive lifestyles. The more we consume, the less objective we become. The idea of incarnating Christ in our culture must mean providing a Christ-enlightened counterpoint and contrast to the false messages of the world, or else it means nothing at all.
Clay Clarkson
posted 3/21/05
I don't think we need more world in the Christians, just more Christians in the world. I don't see the gains on this approach. We need groups to cross over and entertain and evangelize at the secular colleges.
Darrell Fox
Greedy Musicians?
posted 3/9/05
In response to the GMA's anti-piracy campaign: The problem with the record industry isn't downloading. It's high CD prices. I'm sick and tired of hearing artists whine about downloading and CD burning. The cost of producing and distributing music is lower than ever, yet CD prices are $15-$20. Artists like Steven Curtis Chapman don't have to worry about high prices since they are rich enough to hire accountants to help them keep track of the large amounts of money they make from overcharging consumers for CDs. The world doesn't need Chapman's commercial pap. There are plenty of real artists out there right now who have a lot to say and say it with a good deal more originality and passion than Chapman. They don't have a record contract and they're not crying about CD burning. If downloading puts artists like Chapman and Stacie Orrico out of business, the music world would be a much better place. They are misusing their authority as Christian artists to lay a guilt trip on the already overburdened consumer in order to line their own pocketbooks.
Gary D. Kersey
Why Not Sue?
posted 3/9/05
I have followed the music piracy issue since the days of Napster in the "secular" music market. So, why not sue customers like the secular world does? After all, the Christian music industry is a mirror image of the corrupt secular music world in its business model. If the Christian music industry uses the same corrupt worldly system as secular music, which is based on proprietary ownership, control of intellectual property, and paranoia over imagined lost revenues from piracy, should they be surprised if they have the same results? Maybe Christians should take this opportunity to show the world a better way to solve the issue, by abandoning the world's system of intellectual property and paranoid control. The entire issue would go away if people would quit buying music restricted by intellectual property controls like copyright, because the money they pay for the music is going to fund the RIAA, the GMA, and other such organizations. Because intellectual property controls are the invention of the secular business world as a way to maximize revenues, Christians would have an incentive to lead the way in abandoning them.
Scott McMahan
'Morally Banrupt' GMA?
posted 3/9/05
"The GMA Fights Back" was very interesting to me as a pastor. I believe that file duplicating, sharing and distributing is wrong before the Lord. But my problem with the "Millions of wrong don't make a right" campaign is how out of whack the GMA itself is. It is no secret that the GMA and CCM as a whole are becoming morally bankrupt and Christian media is turning a blind eye to most of it. Has anyone ever reported on the accounting techniques of many major Christian labels in relation to royalties paid to artists? An artist can sell 100,000 CDs and still be delivering pizzas to make ends meet. For decades, artists have been fleeced by their record companies and that is the real scandal that no one is reporting. I think [GMA president] John Styll has a bigger problem. The CCM industry is becoming wildly successful but it has become a victim of its own blurring of the lines on what is truly biblical. Ultimately it appears that the one stand they are willing to take on morality is the one that hits them hardest in their wallets.
Pastor Ken Sutton
Teens Not the Only Culprits
posted 3/9/05
I didn't appreciate that you wrote about the problem of "teens" downloading music in your article. Us "teens" are not the only people with a computer and a desire for free music. Our younger brothers and sisters are a lot more computer literate than we were at their age, and they're just as much into downloading as teens. And then there's everyone else older than us. Don't you think it's possible for adults to download as well? I am in no way condoning illegal downloading. But I really don't like being lumped into a demographic of pirating "teens." Commercials speak out against judging people based on their race or nationality, and I'm speaking out against assuming "teens" are the center of illegal downloading. Teens have enough attributed to us without this.
Jeremy Doran
You Nailed It
posted 3/9/05
Your report about today's music is terrific! I think you hit the nail on the head by saying that if we think we are only worshiping when we sing these modern worship songs—even 3 or 4 times, over and over, until people like myself, who are 75, feel like screaming! If that is the only time I ever worship, may heaven help me get it straight. I am a worshipper continually, and therefore shouldn't just sing about it, but live every day because I mean it. Thank you again for that report.
Lucille Bates
Cutting Kutless Some Slack
posted 3/9/05
I think your review of Kutless' Strong Tower does them a disservice. Though songs like "Better is One Day" and "Draw Me Close" run common among worship albums, Kutless does a terrific job at putting them into Kutless style and adding passion to their songs. "Take Me In" and "Strong Tower" are charged with great zeal and biblical truths and reflect raw worship before God. This is Kutless' brightest CD and I think most melodic. Toning their edgy style down a bit, these guys bring to record the passion and worship that flows from their hearts. I think that was their biggest goal in recording this album. Don't mistake purposeful worship for misallocated potential. I think Kutless knew what they were doing with this album and did it for a purpose.
Josh Kramer
Peddling Music
posted 3/9/05
I read LaTonya Taylor's piece on reclaiming hip-hop. I can identify with her wanting to scream when record execs say, "We only produce what people want to hear." But that logic is faulty and it should be challenged at every opportunity. Let's change the occupations and see how that sounds: "I'm a drug dealer and I only peddle what addicts want to buy." It's nowhere near defensible. Yet indeed this is what the entertainment media argues. Where the arts give us the opportunity to examine the human condition, it provides an articulate voice for the trials and tribulations we all go through. But peddlers appeal to the very worst in human nature, all neatly identified in the universal truism of the seven deadly sins (gluttony, greed, envy, lust, sloth, pride, anger). In the same way we pity the addicts and try to help them overcome their addiction and yet prosecute the dealers, we should be doing the same thing with our popular culture.
Jacqui Carling-Rodgers
Russ Lee's Inspiration
posted 2/21/05
Your interview with Russ Lee was an inspiring story from a wonderful Christian man. As a soldier from the Vietnam War, I was moved by Russ' recognition of the soldiers' sacrifice for the basic freedoms of life that most Americans simply take for granted (and usually complain about!). Thanks, Christian Music Today!
Tom Treece
Touched by ApologetiX
posted 2/21/05
Thank you for the ApologetiX interview with J Jackson. I appreciate their ministry. As a teen, secular music was the biggest thing in my life. As far as I knew, there was no such thing as "church rock"—till I learned about ApologetiX. They're an awesome way to reach unsaved young people. Rock music was my god, but if I would have known about ApologetiX back then, maybe I would have gotten to know Jesus sooner. I had no idea I could get the Bible and rock in one package.
Kim Lyerla
posted 2/21/05
Thank you so much for your interview with J. Jackson of ApologetiX. I discovered them while I was looking for a CD on my son's Christmas list and thought, "Biblical Parodies of rock hits? You gotta be kidding!" But once I played Spoofernatural, I was definitely hooked, and I rarely miss a day listening to them. I've proclaimed myself their No. 1 fan.
Wanda Rose Bush
Anberlin's a Stretch
posted 2/21/05
Anberlin a Christian band? It's a stretch for me. It just seems like the entire album doesn't belong. It's so far from anything remotely Christian that I think some blatantly secular bands make me think of God more. You can read more of my thoughts here.
John Brandon
Editor's note: We agree that Anberlin's lyrics don't say much about their faith, but the guys in the band identify themselves as Christians who hold each other accountable to walking the walk.
Bad Comparisons?
posted 2/21/05
How can you compare Anberlin to the Killers, Interpol, the Smiths and Joy Division? Do you even know who Joy Division is? Call Anberlin what they are—a good "modern rock" band that sounds more like Story of the Year, Linkin Park, Good Charlotte or 50 other modern rock bands that all sound the same. Interpol, the Smiths and Joy Division are way too good to be considered in the same sentence as Anberlin.
Todd Brogdon
posted 2/21/05
Your reviewer said Seventh Day Slumber sounds like Incubus. But Incubus is on such a different level. Incubus has something called talent.
Clint Mayo
Changed by Rooftops
posted 2/21/05
Your review of Desperation's From the Rooftops album was completely untrue. I love that album. It has changed my life in more ways than you and your Christian magazine ever have. Just by listening to their CD, I connected with God, and was encouraged to press further into his presence.
Laura Cameron
Regarding Worship Music …
posted 1/24/05
I appreciated "Learning From the Masters" by Steven Gertz. I'm also glad to know I'm not the only one who so often feels that the popular worship choruses hold little depth or meaning. So many churches have chosen to use worship choruses only, during their worship time, and I so often absolutely long to hear and sing some of the old hymns. There is such a message in the hymns; so much so, that at times the whole sermon can be preached just from a hymn. Music has always been such a special worshipful experience for me, and I find it so lacking and empty these days.
Micki Walters
posted 1/24/05
Regarding Steven Gertz's article, I completely agree that many modern praise songs are incredibly shallow. However, we also need to recognize that our Lord is moving in the realm of modern praise music. I immediately think of the lyrics of people like Chris Tomlin, Derek Webb, and Caedmon's Call as having great depth of theological content. I used to think that some of today's modern praise lyricists need to go get M.Divs. But then I started thinking, maybe that's not the best way to look at it. Maybe a better way to look at it is this: Maybe it's time for our theologians to start writing music—or at least lyrics!
Derek Joseph
posted 1/24/05
I agree that contemporary Christian musicians should have a more solid theological foundation before they start creating de facto doctrine through their lyrics. That was one of the principles that motivated me to write Contemporary Christian Musician's Survival Manual: Biblical Principles Applied to Common Issues Facing Contemporary Christian Musicians, available as a free download here.
Jim Pruitt
Apologetix Defenders Unite!
posted 1/20/05
Editor's note: We received a number of responses to our recent review of the new Apologetix album, New & Used Hits. Some excerpts:
I think you misunderstand the band and its purpose. While some may regard Apolgetix as "corny," I don't think there is any band in Christian music who has such an intense desire to strengthen believers' faith (hence the band's name). I have memorized more Scripture since listening to Apologetix in the last four years than any other time in my life. And don't forget, some of the most revered hymns (such as "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God") got their tunes from the secular world, and men of God simply rewrote the lyrics. Still, thanks for recognizing their talent. Many fail to recognize the talent it takes to impersonate about 20 different artists/bands per album. Yes, sometimes they miss the mark, but those times are few and far between.
Bill Newton
I am part of the "loyal following" you mentioned in the review. I discovered these guys three years ago when I was searching for some Christian music I could sink my teeth into after amassing a stack of twice-listened to CDs, and have listened to these guys constantly since then. I have used their music to reach and teach others as well as myself. I have used their lyrics in my personal Bible studies and have learned and remembered more of the Bible through their music than I can tell you. My kids tease me for playing nothing but Apologetix in my car, but one certainly didn't mind when he got the answer to a question correct on his Bible test courtesy of an Apologetix song. I tell them, "If you knew half the lyrics to these songs, you would know a lot of the Bible." And therein lies the mission of Apologetix.
Wanda Rose Bush
The band deserves a lot of respect for what they do, and doesn't deserve having their music compared to The Simpsons. They have received national attention for their music; even Howard Stern has played it. I agree that the band has improved with time, but their early music isn't that bad, and the statement that the songs on the second disc "aren't clever enough to impress the average non-Christian" is mean. Please be more respectful of this band in the future.
Michael Eshom
Your review used the word "amateurish" to describe some of their music, said it illustrates "how lame Christians can be," and there might not be much "replay value." I just wanted you to know that this 41-year-old "lame Christian" mother of six and her children are greatly interested in and "replay" often the "amateurish" music of Apologetix!
Vickie Buehring
Where's U2?
posted 1/12/05
Who there decides who's Christian and who's not for your albums of the year list? You've got one of the best albums of arguably the biggest band in the world, and you're afraid to include it in your list because … why? They aren't on one of your top five Christian labels? Because they're mainstream? Because they might be listened to more by the unchurched than the churched? I don't get it. Go with your gut. Stop babying the Christian community and enabling their fears that "The Evil World" may penetrate their homes.
Dave Pettitt
Hooray for Sara
posted 1/12/05
I am so happy your staff voted Sara Groves' album as Number 1 of the year! I love her albums and have seen her perform twice. Keep getting the word out.
Ann Wind
Great Interviews!
posted 1/12/05
I loved Maryann Hunsberger's interview with Shane Barnard and Shane Everett. She gets right to the point with her questions, and in turn gets some very honest and open answers from the two singers. Bravo to Maryann!
Chris Cacioppo
Loved the 12 Stones interview. There are so many great Christian rock bands out there, like 12 Stones, Pillar, and P.O.D. They are a motivation for me when I work out and run. They are a motivation for me when I'm driving in my car. The lyrics make us stop and think how wonderful God really is and how much he loves us. Christian rock has opened a whole new world for me.
Gina Farnsworth
Hey, You Forgot So-and-So!
Editor's note: We heard from a number of readers after we posted our Best Christian Albums of 2004 list recently, most of them wondering how we could have possibly left someone off the list. Here's a sampling
posted 12/06/04
Your list of the top Christian albums made my stomach hurt. What qualifies someone to make the list? Unoriginality like tobyMac. The guy is terrible; he just tries copying something mainstream and throws a few Jesus this, Jesus that into it—very commercial. Your selection was limited to certain styles of Christian music. The greatest thing to happen to Christian music is mewithoutYou. Completely original and honest. Please try to broaden your views and open your minds. Not every Christian likes Michael W. Smith or dc Talk.
Laurance Honkoski
Johnny Cash dies this year, the same year Hymns is released and no mention of this album on the best of list? Amazing that once again, a man so authentic in his faith and yet held in such high regard in the secular realm is not mentioned. If Christians are supposed to enter into the world and not live in a "Christian" ghetto, why aren't artists like Cash more recognized on these lists?
Name Withheld
I was just wondering why Matthew West and Bethany Dillon aren't up there? I find their songs so moving and reading their lyrics is like reading poetry.
Kelvin Urday
Surprising to me that there are some great albums did not make it to your list—Michael W. Smith, Mercy Me, Tree 63, Selah, Amy Grant. Well, there's always room for improvement.
Derek Leong
As a fan of Christian music for over 16 years (and owner of hundreds of Christian music CDs), I find the omission of Day of Fire a glaring oversight. For crying out loud, this album may rank in the toptwelve ALL TIME for Christian music.You missed the boat big time on this one.
Jake Mayer
I would have included Sarah Kelly, Bethany Dillon, Warren Barfield, and Jeremy Camp somewhere in this list. But especially, how could any top 12 list omit Casting Crowns and the smash record by Barlow Girl?
Joseph Panozzo
In Praise of U2
posted 11/24/04
I really enjoyed Russ Breimeier's review of the new U2 album. He covered all the bases, from the band's illustrious history to the BSQ (Big Spiritual Question) that always accompanies any serious consideration of their music, and finally, the relatively simple task of measuring the quality of their music. Naturally, you'll be hearing from people who don't want Christian Music Today to touch U2 with a ten-foot pole because they're not a praise-and-worship band, who will miss the entire point of the Glimpses of God series despite your cogent explanations in several other places. As C.S. Lewis noted, God walks everywhere incognito, and we as those who seek his face should look for him everywhere, especially among the sick and the lost. We who call ourselves followers of Jesus should carefully consider Bono's body of work as a musical Socratic gadfly to a world bowing before celebrity idols, as a unique voice to teen rock fans and international ambassadors alike, as someone who has used his platform to raise awareness of global issues that most Christians wouldn't touch because they reek of the sin we've all been saved from, because these works are born of salvation. God knows I don't always agree with some of the stuff Bono says and does, but that would also be the case for any number of Christians who've been around me for any length of time. In the meantime, however, there's no denying that this band has a gift for the art of music, and it's a pleasure not only to listen to their work, but to see them coming back around to the joys and challenges of living a genuinely Christian life. Thanks for reminding me of that in your fine article.
Quentin Guy
I really agree with your review of U2's new album. I found it to be rather good. However, I think U2 wants to remain a mystery because they were really hurt and upset over the uproar over "I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For." If there was any song more about confession of faith in their catalog, you would be hard pressed to find it. So they choose to remain quiet and ambiguous about their faith in public. But listening to these lyrics makes it quite clear, especially in "Yahweh," "Vertigo," "City of Blinding Lights," and "All Because of You" what their faith is and what they believe.
Evan Oftedal
Overrating Ruis?
posted 11/17/04
Having played with David Ruis, and being familiar with his catalogue, I must disagree with this review. Three-and-a-half stars? I think this CD is embarassing!It sounds like some 30-something guy, with a home studio, who thinks he's hip, decided to make David's songs cool for teenagers.It's incredibly cheesy!None of the "arrangements" or production "techniques" suit the material. David Ruis' songs are best served and presented in a mostly-acoustic, vocally-interesting setting, geared for an adult audience. I found myself almost laughing out loud at some of this CD, but most of the time just felt sorry for Mr. Ruis.What a blunder.
Rhys Green
Secular References
posted 11/17/04
Why do your reviews include so many references to secular music?
Andrew Dubas
Editor's note: We include secular comparisons in our reviews so readers can find Christian alternatives to secular music, if they so desire.
Great Resource
posted 10/18/04
Thanks for all the great music resources online. I read a lot of your reviews (worship and otherwise) all the time, especially your 4- and 5-star reviews, and I've bought discs just because of your reviews.
Simeon Ng
I Choose to Disagree
posted 10/18/04
I read your review of Point of Grace's I Choose You, and I could not disagree with you more. I'm sad that you gave this album 2 out of 5 stars, because I believe that it's one of their best. This album is different. It's fresh. You say the lyrics lack depth and are uninteresting. On the contrary, the title cut has powerful and theological meaning, and "Justified" is way more than a simplistic summary of grace and forgiveness, it's truth—straight out of Scripture. "Arrival at the City" and "This Is Your Land" paint a glorious picture. I'm really disappointed that you had an opportunity to highlight one of the most enduring acts in Christian music, and from this review, you tear them down. These girls have pressed through the difficulties of raising a family, building a teenage girls conference, taking to time to re-invent themselves with a new look and a new sound, and you did nothing in your article to edify them.
Lisa Weir
Regarding Chevelle …
Posted 10/11/04
I was reading your "Glimpses of God" article on Chevelle's new album and can't believe anybody would even consider them as Christians. It's a shame how teens and even adults take the slightest sign of someone claiming to be a Christian and go along with it, looking for an excuse to justify their wishes of giving in to the flesh and to sin. Just because a song mentions God or has a "spiritual theme" doesn't "label" them or anyone as a true believer. The article noted that they had performed at Ozzfest. My God! How can anyone even think that! Jesus said we can't serve two masters; we either are with God or with the Devil, and they have clearly made their choice.
Tito Roman
Editor's note: Jesus also spent significant amount of time hanging out with and ministering to the lost, and we wouldn't be surprised to see him at an event like Ozzfest.
Are we so desperate to have "Christian bands" in the mainstream that we will make every outlandish excuse for them? I mean, what does a group have to do to get off of Christian Music Today's "We Think They're a Christian Band" list? Chevelle has chosen to use lyrics that mean nothing in this world or the next, and that is their right. But let's not defend it and try to "understand where they are coming from." It's simple: they want to be a rock band instead of a Christian band (assuming they were one to begin with). Where is the sweet Spirit of God in their singing? Where is the anointing that melts hearts? Where is the touch that comes only from heaven? It's not there. Let's focus on those people that do not make an uncertain sound, that live out their Christianity in song—MercyMe, Michael W. Smith, Third Day, Casting Crowns, you get the idea.
Aaron Scott
Editor's note: Yes, we get the idea. And our site primarily does focus on the MercyMe and Third Day types of music—artists who are clearly Christian and making Christian music. But our Glimpses of God section is not, as you put it, a "We Think They're a Christian Band" list. Sometimes we feature artists we know aren't Christian, but show spiritual "leanings" in their music. We also know that some of Chevelle's band members are Christians, but we agree with your assessment that "they want to be a rock band instead of a Christian band." That's why they were featured in our Glimpses area, instead of our regular area of the clearly Christian stuff.
Hillsong's Fruit
Posted 10/11/04
I appreciate that you are trying to give the consumer an opinion of Hillsong Australia's For All You've Don, but my question is this: Is music simply for entertaining and creating a good tempo to create a "feeling"? We were created to worship God. I am glad Hillsong's vision is to teach, equip, and provide tools to worship our Savior. I think they really don't care if they are meeting your expectations of what "they should do." They simply want to worship God Almighty. By the way, this album hit #1 in Australia. The worship team earned secular awards. While accepting the award they were able to give a 2-minute testimony about our Savior. I believe the album has produced much fruit. They are about their "Father's business." I don't think they care about your opinion (neither do I).
Melissa Medlin
Patty Still a Fave
Posted 9/20/04
Thank you for the interview with Sandi Patty. Her life is a testimony to the mercy and grace available to us through Jesus Christ our Lord. She still is my favorite Christian artist.
Rev. Pat Bishop
Passionate About the Project
Posted 9/20/04
As a buyer of all kinds of Christian music, I found the Passion of the Christ: Songs to be one of my favorites. I was very surprised to see it only got 3 stars. In the review, you mentioned that some of the songs weren't faith affirming; that wasn't the attempt of the album. The album was designed to see how artists felt about the movie.
Scott Tatum
Thanks for Being Critical!
Posted 9/20/04
Thanks for your reviews on the website. You are current and keep the reviews new each week. And I especially appreciate the balanced approach you take on the reviews. Many Christian sites rate every album as "5 stars" and have nothing critical to say. This makes choosing which albums to buy extremely hard. Keep up the great work.
Philip Mathew
Tesh Not on the Rocks
Posted 9/20/04
I could not disagree more with your review of John Tesh's Worship at Red Rocks. Your comparisons to Michael W. Smith and Hillsongs are fair, but to say that because these projects are already out there, and that Red Rocks is little more than a souvenir for those who attended the concert is far from true. While there are some similarities to Smith's worship CD (and by the way I think that is the point), Tesh's arrangements are unique while remaining familiar to the average Christian listener. As a musician myself, I can certainly understand him not wanting to re-invent the wheel for a single concert. He doesn't need to distinguish himself as anything and he knows it. His long and successful career in the entertainment field speaks for itself. Red Rocks is not his attempt to win yet another award, nor an attempt to establish himself as a worship leader. It is his true and heartfelt desire to share his faith with the world.
Fred Thornton
On the (Water)Mark
posted 8/30/04
I really enjoyed Maryann Hunsberger's interview with Watermark's Nathan and Christy Nockels. She asked some very insightful questions and got really great replies. This interview helped put into perspective a lot of questions I've had about Christian artists getting radio play and selling a lot of records. I realize now that what's more important is the impact they have on the world.
Chris Cacioppo
We reserve the right to print and/or edit any letters we receive. We cannot reply to every e-mail. Reader opinions on this page do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Christian Music Today.
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Try an Issue of Today's Christian
RISK-FREE!
|
 |
|
No credit card required. Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only. Click here for International orders.
If you decide you want to keep Today's Christian coming, honor your invoice for just $17.95 and receive five more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The trial issue is yours to keep, regardless.
Give Today's Christian as a gift
Buy 1 gift subscription, get 1 FREE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| | |
