LATEST NEWS:

Prosecutors want to reinstate murder charge
Prosecutors asked an appeals court Tuesday to reinstate a murder conviction for a woman who served two years in prison for manslaughter in the dog-mauling death of a neighbor.
Full story

Dog mauling couple out on parole
After serving slightly more than half her four year sentence, Marjorie Knoller was granted parole. She and her husband, Robert Noel, were convicted of involuntary manslaughter for their dogs' fatal mauling of their San Francisco neighbor. Knoller was also convicted of second-degree murder, but the trial judge overturned the jury's decision.
Full story
Noel paroled in September 2003

Four years
The San Francisco lawyer whose dogs fatally mauled a neighbor was sentenced in July 2002 to four years in prison, the maximum allowed for involuntary manslaughter — but far less than the term she would have faced for second-degree murder.
Full story

New trial granted on murder charge
Though he had harsh words for convicted couple Marjorie Knoller and Robert Noel, Judge James Warren set aside Knoller's second-degree murder conviction and granted her a retrial. The couple still faces sentencing for involuntary manslaughter and owning a mischievous animal.
Full story
Defense's motion for a new trial
Prosecution's reply

Knoller changes lawyers
Convicted of second-degree murder, Marjorie Knoller hires a new lawyer to handle her sentencing. Appeals specialist Dennis Riordan replaces trial attorney Nedra Ruiz, who made headlines for unorthodox courtroom theatrics.
Full story
Sentencing delayed

Verdict: Guilty on all counts
A Los Angeles jury has found lawyer Marjorie Knoller guilty of second-degree murder and both she and her husband Robert Noel guilty of manslaughter for their dogs' fatal mauling of a neighbor.
Full story
Watch the verdict
View verdict sheets




  • March 18, 2002:Closing arguments




  • March 15, 2002:Defense calls last witness
  • March 14, 2002:Knoller takes the stand
  • March 14, 2002:Defense report: Remorse would have spared murder charge
  • March 11, 2002:Defendant sobs on stand
  • March 8, 2002:Witness heard screams, whimpering
  • March 8, 2002:Hearing to be held over defense lawyer's interview
  • March 8, 2002:Defense lawyer unconventional
  • March 7, 2002:Defense witness testimony backfires
  • March 6, 2002:Witnesses testify dogs were well-behaved
  • March 5, 2002:Defense's turn to present case




  • March 4, 2002:Pictures, ME detail injuries
  • March 1, 2002:Victim's partner endures painful cross
  • March 1, 2002:Jury won't see dog's skull
  • Feb. 28, 2002:Eyewitness neighbor describes mauling
  • Feb. 28, 2002:Witness: Knoller seemed cold after fatal attack
  • Feb. 27, 2002: Parade of witnesses testify about dogs
  • Feb. 26, 2002:Neighbors take the stand
  • Feb. 21, 2002:Defendants linked to prison gang
  • Feb. 21, 2002:Witnesses say dogs were dangerous
  • Feb. 20, 2002:Previous owner: Bane was a "big clown"




  • Feb. 19, 2002: Emotional openings kick off dog maul trial
  • Feb. 15, 2002: Jury picked for dog mauling trial
  • Feb. 14, 2002: Witness to hear dog-maul opening
  • Feb. 8, 2002: Possible jurors tell dog attack tales
  • Jan. 25, 2002: Jury selection opens in dog attack
  • Jan. 24, 2002: Prospective jurors quizzed on views of dogs




  • Feb. 2, 2002: Sex testimony denied in dog trial
  • Jan. 31, 2002: Dog in deadly attack killed
  • Jan. 29, 2002: Dog mauling victim partner can testify
  • Jan. 2, 2002: Judge to rule in dog attack cases
  • Oct. 26, 2001: Court upholds dog's death sentence
  • May 30, 2001: San Francisco couple plead not guilty
  • Apr. 11, 2001: Victim's mother files wrongful death suit
  • Mar. 30, 2001: Did couple know dogs were dangerous?
  • Mar. 29, 2001: Bail set high for San Francisco couple in dog attack
  • Mar. 28, 2001: Grand jury indicts two in fatal dog attack
  • Mar. 13, 2001: Lesbian partner files wrongful death suit
  • Mar. 1, 2001: Judge denies media request for documents
  • Feb. 23, 2001: Second dog in fatal mauling case ordered destroyed
  • Feb. 22, 2001: Killer dog conspiracy theory
  • Feb. 14, 2001: Public testifies of run-ins with dogs
  • Jan. 27, 2001: Woman mauled by neighbor's dog


  •     Married lawyers Marjorie Knoller and Robert Noel are convicted of all counts for the fatal dog mauling of their neighbor, Diane Whipple. Knoller was found guilty of second-degree murder, while she and her husband were both convicted of manslaughter and owning a dangerous animal.    
       
  • Seven-part backgrounder
  • Full coverage
  •    
       
  • Marjorie Knoller
  • Robert Noel
  • Diane Whipple
  • Paul "Cornfed" Schneider
  • The courtroom players
  •    
       
  • Case overview
  •    
       
  • 911 call 
  • Verdict 
  • Defense's closing  More
  • Prosecutor's closing   More
  • Opening statements
  •    
       
  • Murder

  • Manslaughter

  • Owning a Mischievous Animal

  •    
       
  • Post your comments about the case
  •    
       
  • New Trial Motion
    After her conviction, Marjorie Knoller seeks a new trial in this 90-page appeal

  • Defense's Response
    Following the prosecution's response to the new trial motion, which held that Knoller's murder conviction should stand, the defense filed this response

  • Verdict Sheet
    Jurors must fill this form out once they determine whether or not to convict Knoller of murder or Noel and Knoller of manslaughter and keeping a dangerous animal

  • Noel's Letter
    Before he was charged, Robert Noel wrote an 18-page letter to DA Terence Hallinan

  • Vicious Dog Hearing
    Witnesses offer accounts about Bane and Hera, who they say were dangerous

  • Civil Complaint
    Diane Whipple's lover, Sharon Smith, filed this controversial wrongful death suit against the defendants

  • The Indictment
    Grand jury indicted Knoller for second-degree murder and the couple for manslaughter and keeping a dangerous animal

  • Prosecution's Motion
    These excerpts argue that evidence regarding the dogs and the relationship between the defendants and their adopted son should be admissible

  • Motion to Exclude
    The defense successfully sought to keep testimony regarding sexual relationships out of the trial

  •    
     

    ©2007 Courtroom Television Network LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms & Privacy Guidelines

    Small Court TV Logo