IJT logo

 

Introduction

Editors:
Friedemann Pfäfflin,
Ulm University, Germany
 

Walter O. Bockting,
University of Minnesota, USA
 

Eli Coleman,
University of Minnesota, USA
 

Richard Ekins,
University of Ulster at Coleraine, UK
 

Dave King,
University of Liverpool, UK

Managing Editor:
Noelle N Gray,
University of Minnesota, USA

Editorial Assistant:
Erin Pellett,
University of Minnesota, USA

Editorial Board

Authors

Contents
book Historic Papers

Info
Authors´Guidelines

© Copyright

Published by
Symposion Publishing

  
ISSN 1434-4599



Volume 2, Number 1, January - March 1998




Empirical Data on Epidemiology and Application of the German Transsexuals' Act During Its First Ten Years

By C. Weitze, M.D., S. Osburg, M.D.

Citation: Weitze C., M.D., Osburg S., M.D. (1997) Empirical Data on Epidemiology and Application of the German Transsexuals' Act During Its First Ten Years . IJT 2,1, http://www.symposion.com/ijt/ijtc0303.htm

Abstract

In Europe special legislation for transsexuals was fist passed by Sweden in 1972, followed by Germany in 1981, Italy in 1982, the Netherlands in 1985, and Turkey in 1988.

As far as legislation between different countries with various civil-law systems can be compared, laws relating to transsexuals demonstrate considerable differences. The German Transsexuals´ Act (TSG) provides two options, which may be applied either successively or independently of each other. The first so-called "minor solution" refers to changing the applicant's first name in accordance with Section 1 of the Transsexuals' Act (§1 TSG). The second so called "major solution", legislates gender reassignment according to § 8 TSG. For both proceedings two mutually independent expert opinions are necessary. These expert evaluations have to certify that diagnostic criteria for transsexualism have been in existence for at least three years, and that the condition is of lasting nature. For the "major solution", e.g. the change of legal sex, the applicant has to undergo sex reassignment surgery the extend of which is not precisely defined and adapt his external physical appearance to that of the desired gender. The applicant must furthermore be unmarried and permanently incapable of reproduction. The lower age limit of 25 years, which had originally been required for both proceedings, was eliminated for the legal status change in 1982 according to a decision by the highest German court (Federal Constitutional Court); it continued to be applied for change of first name until 1993. Hormone treatment and surgery do not generally require legal permission; however, a request for castration must be reviewed in advance by two physicians according to the German Castration Act.

We considered the tenth anniversary of the German TSG as an occasion to review the application of this law, and also the epidemiological data arising from its use.

Methods

The first goal of this study was the exhaustive examination of all decisions rendered on the basis of the Transsexuals´Act in West Germany during the initial ten years of its existence. To this end, questionnaires were submitted to all German courts of first resort which handle such cases. 36 of these had decided cases according to TSG from 1981 to 1990.

Secondly , all judges who had dealt with TSG cases were asked to fill out questionnaires concerning their decision making rationale. We got answers from 39 judges out of 27 courts.

Thirdly, questionnaires were sent to all transsexuals, who had obtained an expert`s opinion. They were asked about their experience of undergoing an assessment by two different experts. Of our 60 transsexual clients, we could reach 49 persons, of whom 37 answered our questionnaire.
  

Results

Prevalence:
In the Federal Republic of (West) Germany from 1981 to 1990 (i.e. the last decade before reunification), German courts decided on 1,422 cases of transsexualism. Decrees on first name changes according to § 1 TSG constituted 683 of this total. There were 733 rulings on sex change (change of legal status) according to § 8 TSG. In addition, there were six applications involving retransformation. Since some people had applied for first name change and sex change successively, these cases represented 1,199 persons.

Based on the adult population, this figure corresponds to a ten year prevalence rate of approximately 2.4 applicants per 100,000 population. If one considers only the legally recognized transsexuals , i.e. those 1,047 applications approved in court, then the adjusted ten year prevalence rate amounts to 2.1 transsexuals per 100,000 population.

The 1,199 applications submitted under the German Transsexuals' Act between 1981 and 1990 represent a number certainly considerably below the total number of transsexuals living in West Germany during the period covered. So far, no empirical studies have been able to estimate the absolute number of cases of gender identity disorder. Gathering epidemiological data on this disorder has proven to be methodologically difficult, as repeatedly demonstrated by reports in the literature.

Table 1: The prevalence of transsexualism - overview on previous studies

Autor Land TS Total M-zu-F F-zu-M Ratio M: F
Walinder 1967 Sweden 1: 54.000 1: 37.000 1: 103.000 2,8:1
Pauly 1968 USA 1: 100.000 1: 400.000 4:1
Hoenig & Kenna 1974 England 1: 53.000 1: 34.000 1: 108.000 3,2:1
Ross et al 1981 Australia 1: 42.000 1: 24.000 1: 150.000 6,1:1
Tsoi 1988 Singapore 1: 2.900 1: 9.000 1: 27.000
Gooren et al.1992 Netherlands 1:11.900 1: 30.400 70-80%: 20-30%
Osburg & Weitze 1993 Germany
(Former Federal Republic)
1: 42.000 -
1: 48.000
=
2,1 - 2,4
100.000
1:36.000-1:42.000 1: 94.000 -
1: 104.000
2,3:1-
2,2:1

Of all the epidemiological studies of transsexualism, so far only a small number have attempted to systematically incorporate the required data from all available sources of a particular country (e.g., Walinder 1968; Ross et al. 1981; and Tsoi 1988). Most of these populations are from centralized treatment institutions which we can assume are treating the great majority of transsexuals living in a given country (e.g., Benjamin 1966; Pauly 1968; Hoenig & Kenna,1974; Gooren 1993). In all empirical studies transsexualism appears to be a relatively rare phenomenon. However, owing to fundamental differences in data collection, the comparative validity of these studies is limited, as are estimates of the prevalence of transsexualism.

Frequency of claims and court orders during the data collection period:
After an initial peak in the number of claims ( 68 under § 1 TSG and 94 § 8 TSG) in 1981, there were definitely fewer applications in the following four years 1982-1985. From 1986 to 1990, the application frequency rose again and reached a level (107 applications under § 1 TSG and 98 under § 8 TSG) which has not since been exceeded. One can furthermore conclude from these numbers that, during the first five years under the law, the number of sex changes was higher than first name changes.


Figure 1
: German Court Orders in Transsexual Cases from 1981 to 1990

An initial peak during the first year had to be expected, because there probably was a back log of applicants eagerly awaiting the new legislation who had long since met requirements for changing their legal status. This interpretation in fact explains the peak of legal status changes during the first two years under the law, as well as the following decrease from 1982 to 1985. However, the continually increasing number of applications from 1986 on is extraordinary. In order to determine whether this increase actually reflects a general trend, more long term studies are necessary. Gooren and al. (1993) noted a steady increase of cases up to 1989, followed by a slight decrease in 1990 and 1991.

Distribution of gender
There was an overall predominance of male-to-female transsexuals of 2.3: 1. For first name changes, the ratio is roughly 3 : 1 in favor of male-to-female transsexuals, for determination of sexual identity it is only 2 : 1. A comparison of the various years of the study period reveals considerable fluctuations in the gender distribution: ranging from 8.5 : 1 for first-name change in 1982 to 1.6 : 1 in 1985. As far as legal sex change applications are concerned, however, the distribution of male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals approaches equality. Within the period of data collection, we found a considerable range of variation between the individual years, without a recognizable trend. As a result, we cannot support Walinder's and Pauly´s assertion of a development toward an equal number of male-to female and female-to-male transsexuals (1971,1981).


Figure 2a
: Distribution of Gender - First Name Changes


Figure 2b
: Distribution of Gender - Legal Status Changes

At any rate, it is noteworthy that the predominance of male-to-female transsexuals is considerably lower for legal status changes than for changes of first name. It must also be emphasized that female-to-male transsexuals file their applications, and begin a sex-reassignment treatment at a younger average age. This corresponds to comparative studies, that reveal a higher degree of social integration of female-to-male transsexuals at the time of the diagnosis, or before treatment and legal recognition (Pauly 1974, Kockott &Fahrner, 1988).

Age distribution of applicants
The average age of applicants at the time of their legal decrees was 33 for first name as well as for legal status change. The core group is formed by those 25 to 34 years of age. The mean age of the male-to-female transsexuals was 34, which is higher than that for female-to-male, which was only 30 years for both proceedings. The overall age distribution of all applicants is comparable with the Dutch study by Gooren et al. ( 1993). A considerably younger average age is stated for Singapore (1988); there, 82% of the male-to-female and 71% of the female-to-male transsexuals, were under 30 years of age.


Figure 3
: Age Distribution of German Transsexuals ( 1981 - 1990 )

Nature of court decisions rendered:
The great majority of applications under §§ 1 and 8 TSG -- that is to say 83% and 96%, respectively -- received decisions of approval. Nearly one third of the 17% of the rejected applicants for first-name change had been younger than the minimum age of 25 years. The age distribution of those whose application for legal status change was rejected is relatively uniform ( as can now be expected for first name changes after abolition of the age limit).

The ratio of accepted to rejected applications for both proceedings showed no statistically significant differences between male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals. The actual surprising result here, however, is that in a significant number of cases, the courts ignored the age limit of 25.

Differences in the nature of the decisions rendered
From 1981 to 1990 no statistically significant change occurred in the judicial practice of German courts in this context, therefore the considerable regional differences stand out. The rate of rejections varied between 5% and 20%, with a mean of 12% in cases of §1 with similar results for change in legal sexual classification. The rejections were predominantly concentrated in certain courts.

Such inconsistencies result from varying judicial interpretations of the Transsexuals' Act, and / or from use of poorly defined criteria in the assessments by the court appointed experts. The assumption of considerable regional differences in the judicial practice was confirmed by our inquiry of the judges:

There were variations concerning the nature of evidence judges demanded as proof that a transsexual condition had existed for at least three years, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Differences in the judicial practice - the evidence for the transsexual perception

Evidence for transsexual perception Judges %
applicant must have lived in desired sex-role in public for 3 years 10 26%
applicant must have lived in desired sex-role in private
life
for 3 years
7 18%
The inner compulsion to live in the genetically other
role for 3 years is sufficent
22 56%

Also, concerning surgical sex- reassignment there seemed to be considerable differences in the kind of evidence the judges expected the transsexual applicants to submit in order to bolster their claim of membership in the desired gender as shown in table 3 and table 4.

Table 3: Differences in the judicial practice - demands for change of sex in m-t-f- transsexuals

Mesures demanded Judges %
1.+2.+3.+4. 4 10%
1.+2.+3. 9 23%
1.+2. 14 36%
only 5. 4 10%
other combinatons 8 21%

Surgical measures for m-t-f transsexuals:

  1. Resection of Penis
  2. Castration
  3. Vaginoplasty
  4. Breast-implants in case of insufficient breast-size
  5. Only Sterilization
      

Table 4: Differences in the judicial practice - demands for change of sex in f-t-m- transsexuals

Mesures demanded Judges %
1.+2.+3. 9 23%
1.+2.+4. 8 21%
1.+2.+4.+5. 4 10%
1.+2.+5. 4 10%
1.+2.+3.+5. 1 3%
1.+2.+3.+5.+6. 1 3%
1.+2. 2 5%
only 1. 2 5%
only 7. 5 13%
other combinations 3 7%

Surgical measures for f-t-m transsexuals:

  1. Resection of uterus
  2. Resection of ovaries
  3. Resection of breast dependent on size
  4. Resection of breast independent on size
  5. Phalloplasty
  6. Cremaster surrogate
  7. Only Sterilization

The figures demonstrate, that in case of male-to-female transsexuals we find in 10% a maximum and in 10% a minimum of demands for being legally accepted as women. In the case of female-to-male transsexuals 23 % of the judges demanded only sterilization or the resection of the inner sexual organs, measures, which do not adapt the applicant to the outward appearance of the desired sex, as demanded by the German law, while 31 % of them demanded some kind of phalloplasty besides the resection of uterus , ovaries and breasts. It was especially noteworthy that even among judges of the same court there existed considerable differences in decision making patterns ranging from minimum to maximum demands. One got the impression that prerequisites for name or sex change applications were arbitrary. None of the 39 judges had considered changing the nature of these prerequisites based on innovations in medical/surgical treatments in the last decade. In light of the progress made by medicine it seems particularly surprising that many judges accepted sterilization as a sufficient prerequisite for sex reassignment.

The expert testimony.
Little is known about the differences in the assessment procedures by experts. According to the inquiry of 37 transsexual clients, the experts assessments took between 1 and 52 weeks, with a median value of 12 weeks and an average of 16 weeks. This means that in most cases the assessment period was shorter than the minimum six months required by the Standards of Care of the HBIGDA. This is important, because over two thirds of our clients used these approval letters not only for changing their first names but also as a recommendation for surgery. Most surgeons and social insurance companies now insist on this clinical documentation. In our opinion, this assessment time is too short , and yet 57% of the transsexuals as well as, interestingly enough, the majority of the judges deemed it as too long.

Furthermore, we were astonished to discover that the procedure of a mandatory assessment by two experts was rated negatively by 19 transsexuals and positively by 18, but on the other hand, nearly two thirds considered an assessment by two experts as more objective.

Applications for retransformation.
Of the 1,422 applications filed throughout West Germany in the period from 1981 to 1990 according to the TSG, a total of six were for retransformation. This amounts to a rate of 0.4%. Five requests for reversal concerned first name changes and only one for reestablishment of the original gender classification.

The rarity of claims for retransformation corresponds to the recently published review of all international publications on the catamnesis of transsexuals by Pfäfflin and Junge (1992). Nevertheless, with view to our own clients we think, that it is probable that not every case of an unsuccessful or mistaken sex reassignment will lead to application for retransformation. It seems to us much more likely that, instead of choosing the unsatisfactory possibility of physical reversal, a transsexual will elect to stay in role of first change or suicide.
  

Conclusions

As in all empirical studies transsexualism is shown to be a relatively rare phenomenon. There is a predominance of male to female transsexuals of roughly 2:1. Female to male transsexuals change sex earlier with all possible legal consequences.

Although in Germany a special legislation for transsexuals does exist, there are remarkable differences in the practice of jurisdiction.

The extreme rarity of sex retransformation applications appears on the surface to evidence that there were extremely few erroneous judicial rulings in the Federal Republic of Germany. However, we doubt that this result can be attributed to thorough and differentiated diagnostic study, to optimal surgical possibilities, or to sufficiently long testing of new sex roles in everyday life by the persons affected , underlying factors cited for successful sex retransformation in the literature. With view to the great variations in the procedures of expert`s assessment and with view to the fact, that the number of regretful sex changes among our clients is higher than the reported percentage and not all of them claim for retransformation, to us the question arises as to whether the diagnostic security perceived as apparent here may not in fact originate in an artificial framework of interrelated medical examination, hormone therapy, and judicial measures -- and whether it may not actually be rigidly fixed on an iatrogenic basis. The hormone therapy, in Germany usually started before or during TSG proceedings, may well represent a one way street with no return.

In our opinion it would be more effective to considerably simplify the process of first name change as a trial stage to allow persons with a gender identity disorder to become accustomed to their new role in everyday life, without the requirement for judges or experts to verify that a firmly established and lasting transsexual feeling existed on the part of the applicant. A thorough examination should be rather initiated from the point in time at which an applicant desired irreversible therapeutic measures such as hormone therapy or surgery.
  

References

Benjamin H. The Transsexual Phenomenon. Julian Press, New York: 1966.

Gooren L, Van Kesteren P, Megens J. Epidemiological Data on 1194 Transsexuals. Poster presented on the conference "Psychomedical Aspects of Gender Problems", Amsterdam, April 18 - 20, 1993.

Hoenig J, Kenna J. The prevalence of transsexualism in England and Wales. Brit.J.Psychiat. 1974 ; 124: 181-190.

Kockott G, Fahrner EM. Male-to-female and female-to-male Transsexuals: A comparison. Arch. sex. Behav. 1988; 17: 539-546.

Pauly I. The current status of the change of sex operation. J. Nerv. Ment. 1968; 147: 460-471.

Pauly I. Adult manifestations of male transsexualism. In: Transsexualism and Sex Reassignment. Green R, Money J, eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1969: 37 - 58.

Pauly I. Adult manifestations of female transsexualism. In: Transsexualism and Sex Reassignment. Green R, Money J, eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1969: 59 - 87.

Pauly I. Female Transsexualism: Part I and II. Arch. Sex. Behav. 1974; 3: 487-526.

Pfäfflin F, Junge A. Nachuntersuchungen nach Geschlechtsumwandlung. Eine kommentierte Literaturübersicht 1961 - 1991. In: Geschlechtsumwandlung. Pfäfflin F., Junge A, eds. Stuttgart, New York: Schattauer Verlag 1993 : 149 ff.

Ross MW, Walinder J, Lundström B, Thuwe I. Cross- cultural approaches to transsexualism. Acta. psychiat. scand. 1981; 63: 75-82.

Tsoi WF. The prevalence of transsexualism in Singapore. Acta psychiatr. scand. 1988; 78: 501.

Walinder J. Transsexualism: Definition, prevalence and sex distribution. Acta psychiatr. scand. 1968; suppl.: 255-257.

Walinder J. Incidence and sex ratio of transsexualism in Sweden. Brit. J. Psychiat 1971; 118: 195-196.

1 Freie Universität Berlin
Institut für forensische Psychiatrie
Limonenstraße 27
D 12203 Berlin
Tel.: 0049 - 30 - 832 70 14 / 15

2 Landesinstitut für gerichtliche und soziale Medizin
Invalidenstraße 52
D 10557 Berlin