The East African Standard | Online Edition

East African Standard - Online Edition

   
Home
National
Sports
Special Reports
Commentaries
Intelligence
Letters
Editorial

Big Issue | Financial Standard | Maddo | Pulse | Style | Society
  Sunday, July 4, 2004

    

Arms trade needs tougher regulation
By Carol Kimani

The death of Dr Crispin Mbai last September shook the nation, as did the assassinations of Tom Mboya, JM Kariuki, Pio Gama Pinto and Robert Ouko years before.

Other than raising political temperatures, these deaths share a striking similarity: a failure by society to control the flow of small arms.

Kenya is one of the countries where millions of conventional arms are in the wrong hands.

Thousands are displaced, orphaned, widowed or killed every year because of the thriving trade in small arms.

Though legitimate and well intentioned — for self-defence and the maintenance of law and order — 59 per cent of small arms produced conventionally find their ways to the wrong hands.

Many weapons traded in the international market are used to fuel deadly conflicts or commit gross human rights violations and abuses. To stop this carnage resulting from irresponsible trade in and use of weapons, international trade in arms needs to be subjected to strict control. The only way to ensure that all states strictly control the movement of arms is through the establishment of a binding global treaty.

The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) could be the panacea because, if accepted, it will establish a firm and unambiguous international mechanism to prohibit the sale of weapons where there is a clear risk that such arms could be abused. International legal experts, human rights and peace organisations have already drafted a model Arms Trade Treaty.

That Kenya is today home to hundreds of thousands of refugees displaced from their homelands by armed conflicts tells volumes about the cost of uncontrolled arms.

Hundreds of thousands of children have been orphaned as a result of armed conflicts or petty crime as well.

The actions of those who commit such acts are not only horrific, but also illegal under the International law. And yet in many circumstances, such forces enjoy unfretted access to the international arms’ market, which enables them to visit enormous suffering on humanity.

Armed conflicts pitting nations cause massive human loss worldwide. Violations against international humanitarian law, which include wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, illegal detention and unfair trial, cause immense suffering to mankind.

 

Abuse

Weapons have also been known to cause gross human rights abuses. They play a role, directly or indirectly, in the ability of armed groups and security forces to abuse human rights.

The most severe ones include denial of the right to life by use of lethal force, extra judicial killings, torture, amputations, denial of basic freedoms through arbitrary arrests and lengthy pre-trails.

But all is not lost. The Arms Trade Treaty, if operational, will help prevent these atrocities. First, it will help stop the flow of weapons to abusive users, thus reducing the available means of violence and making the recourse to armed force less immediate and deadly.

This will create a positive obligation on arms’ exporters to ensure their weapons will not be misused. The treaty will put pressure on suppliers and recipients to comply with international standards.

Besides spelling out basic minimum steps that states must take in order to control the weapons trade, the treaty will ensure that all states play by the same rules. The envisioned treaty spells out a common set of minimum standards that states have to respect.

Arms manufacturers and brokers will have a hard time finding a safe haven for irresponsible activities. The more states embrace ATT, the greater the effect it will have.

The treaty requires states to incorporate the rules into their national laws and make regular public reports of all arms transferred to an international registry.

The core principles of the model ATT include international arms transfers that require all international arms be authorised by the appropriate state authorities and licences issued.

Governments have a responsibility not to transfer arms where they are likely to be used to facilitate the commission of violent crimes, adversely affect political stability or regional security and affect sustainable development.

Why act now? The situation is critical. More arms are being manufactured everyday. About 1,135 companies in at least 98 countries produce arms, which add up to eight million new weapons each year. Civilian casualties are increasing and modern weapons tend to exacerbate this trend.



Special Reports | Home Page

Copyright © 2004 . The Standard Ltd


The Standard Ltd
I & M Building, Kenyatta Avenue,
P.O Box 30080, 00100 GPO, Nairobi-Kenya.

Tel. +254 20 3222111, Fax: +254 20 214467, 229218, 218965.
Email:
editorial@eastandard.net, online@eastandard.net
News room Tel: +254 20 3222111, Fax: +254 20 213108.
Advertising:
standard.ads@swiftkenya.com