archive : A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Cover Art Múm
Finally We Are No One
[Fat Cat; 2002]
Rating: 7.5

The buzz around Múm began early in 2001, and the word on the street was that another Icelandic band was making music as pretty and epic as Sigur Rós. Those tuning into the hype were surprised when they finally heard Yesterday Was Dramatic, Today Is Okay. On their debut album, Múm sounded like a melodic laptop outfit with a curiosity about acoustic instruments. Nothing about the record suggested the word "band." Sure, there were some "la-la" vocals here and there, a good amount of accordion and the occasional guitar, but Bogdan Raczynski's last record had all those qualities in equal measure and he never lost his IDM identity. However Múm were presented, there was no mistaking the quality of the music.

With their second full-length album Finally We Are No One, Múm definitely sounds like a 'band', in the traditional sense of the word. Almost half the tracks feature proper vocals singing songs; the horns, strings and accordion are even more evident; and the modular synthesizer patches have been relegated to the background. The band continues to build its rhythmic foundation around glitch-inspired beats, but the sound surrounding the clicks and pops is more conventionally musical. How you feel about this new development will depend on which path you hoped Múm would follow. If the marching voices that emerged at the tail end of "There Is a Small Number of Things" were what moved you, then you'll find Finally We Are No One very much to your liking. If, on the other hand, you found the sprightly beat programming and warm synth chords of "I'm 9 Today" and "Awake on a Train" to be the foundation of what made Yesterday Was Dramatic so great, you'll find yourself enjoying this one a little less.

To my ears, the closer Múm gets to conventional song structures, the less appealing the band is. At its heart, Múm is not bestowed with the gift of melody, and too many of the tunes here come across as simplistic and trite. "We Have a Map of the Piano" has the same lead line as the familiar keyboard exercise "Heart and Soul" (I'm not suggesting they stole the melody-- I doubt the band has even heard it-- but I can't think of anything else when I listen to this track). While it adds to the innocent cast of the tune, it does little to encourage repeat plays. "Don't Be Afraid, You Have Just Got Your Eyes Closed" and the first half of "K/Half Noise" are similarly powered by the kind of inane four-note melody a toddler might dream up.

With all that out of the way, the fact remains that this is still a good album, if not a great one. Despite containing a few tunes that grate with their simple-minded sweetness, a handful of others are excellent. Released earlier as a single, "Green Grass of Tunnel" is far and away their best stab at conventional songwriting, with a whimsical melody appropriate to the music-box backing and a nice mix of organ, accordions, and strings. The title track, an instrumental, also displays a sense of balance, as it moves from dark, crunching sounds in its first third to a nice melody doubled on violin and trumpet, before returning to its murky resting place amid gurgles of distortion at the end. The lengthy closer "The Land Between Solar Systems" is pretty great, building from near silence to a low-grade fever pitch, unfolding like an epic Quickspace tune in extreme slow motion.

I understand that the child's-view angle is a large part of Múm's appeal, and I don't mean to discount this approach to music-- as a devoted fan of Nobukazu Takemura, I'd be a hypocrite to argue against it. But something's missing from Múm's relentless pursuit of beauty and innocence: a sense of struggle. They're almost too good at making simple, pretty music at this point, and the tracks content to pursue these qualities alone come across as fluffy. With the digital aspect of the sound played down in favor of uncomplicated acoustic melodies, Múm seems just a bit less substantial.

-Mark Richard-San, May 21st, 2002







10.0: Essential
9.5-9.9: Spectacular
9.0-9.4: Amazing
8.5-8.9: Exceptional; will likely rank among writer's top ten albums of the year
8.0-8.4: Very good
7.5-7.9: Above average; enjoyable
7.0-7.4: Not brilliant, but nice enough
6.0-6.9: Has its moments, but isn't strong
5.0-5.9: Mediocre; not good, but not awful
4.0-4.9: Just below average; bad outweighs good by just a little bit
3.0-3.9: Definitely below average, but a few redeeming qualities
2.0-2.9: Heard worse, but still pretty bad
1.0-1.9: Awful; not a single pleasant track
0.0-0.9: Breaks new ground for terrible