When a layreader leads worship an authoritative role is exercised by that leader. This is so whether or not the lay-leader is simply reading material prepared by a pastor. It is the function of leadership itself, not merely the source of the material being read, that indicates an exercise of authority. The LCA opposes women serving with this kind of authority in worship. This is the theological position and current teaching of the LCA based on Scripture.
Therefore the advice given to Synod before the vote, that women acting as layreaders is not a theological matter and consequently requiring a simple majority vote only, was incorrect. This raises serious doubt about validity of the decision made on this mistaken advice. A two-thirds majority vote is required by Synod after a recommendation from the Pastors Conference for constitutional proprieties to be satisfied where theological issues are involved.
I believe it is important to remove the doubt in this matter. We also need to restore confidence in the authority of Synod’s decision making. To do this the decision in question should be revisited after proper consideration and recommendation from a future Pastors Conference. In the meantime, for the sake of good order it would be prudent for congregations not to enact constitutional changes to enable the practice of women layreaders which carries with it doubt, uncertainty, and legitimate dissent.
Pastor Avito da Costa
DOCTRINAL STATEMENTS AND THEOLOGICAL OPINIONS OF THE LUTHERAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA
SHOULD WOMEN SERVE AS LAY READERS IN PUBLIC WORSHIP?
The Commission cannot at this time approve the practice of women serving
as lay readers in worship. We recommend that the church does not adopt this
practice. The reasons for this judgment or opinion are as follows:
1.
When a layman conducts a lay-reading service, he is functioning in the
place of the pastor as leader in worship. He serves in this role by appointment
by the congregation and under the authorisation and supervision of the pastor.
In other words, his function and work falls within the area of service with the
word. It is carried out on the authority of the pastor as an extension of the
ministry with word and sacrament.
2.
Some would argue that, since a lay reader functions in the place of the
pastor and since the pastor is really responsible for the service, it should
not matter whether the lay reader is a man or a woman. However, leading in
worship is more than merely a function; it presumes an authoritative role in
the worshipping community. The present theological position of the Lutheran
Church of Australia is against women serving with this kind of authority.
Therefore it would not be appropriate for women to act as leaders in public
worship.
3.
We also believe that the church would be acting unwisely if it were to
adopt this practice at a time when a church-wide study is being undertaken on
women and the office of the ministry. Adopting this practice at this time would
inevitably be seen by many either as pre-empting the church's decision on this
question, or as a strong statement in favour of women undertaking a leading
role in the liturgical community.
4.
We believe it is wise at the present time for the whole church to become
seriously involved in the ongoing discussions and debate and to await the
consensus which we hope to achieve on this matter. Any action which could be
seen as pre-empting the final decision, should be avoided.
Note: As a general principle the church has always recognised the need to take emergency measures to meet needs in emergencies.